I have to say each bike is purpose built, in that I mean if you want FAST, you build it LOW and long so it will stay on the ground. A1/8 mile strip would be a CHALLENGE for a rookie rider on any CBR to wax a PRO on a HOT KZ, problem is the CBR is REAL hard to control on just the back wheel and by the time the rider can get it down and keep it down the OLD KZ has already broke the trap at 1/8 mile.
I think you need to check specs on the aircraft also. The F-4 was very fast in straight flight, Had 2 80,000 lb thrust engines with AB but it would take a couple of miles to make a complete circle, as for the Korean War ERA F-86 it could barely break MACH. The A-7 Corsair was VERY fast also but it was built for 1 primary mission to deliver bombs on target and then bug out as fast as possible to out fly the blast but it better be in a straight line. The F18 is great combat weapon but why didn't you mention the F-16,F-15, A-10,AV-8,JSF. These are ALL built for a certain purpose an F-18 will NEVER equal an A-10 for time on target an taking care of business . Oh I forgot to mention the AC130 GUNSHIP it was built to put LEAD(ARMOR PIERCING) up the enemies backside.
But this is about a new tech bike vs old school and comfort level the newer bikes are lighter for one reason WT/HP ratio. You take any M/C ie,CB750 load it to the top with gear for a cross country (CAMPING) ride and it is MORE comfortable on the hi way because of the weight you added , you just don't feel all the ripples and cuts in the road like riding empty and trust me ,when a truck passes the wind WILL push you , I would rather have something comfortable with enough torque to ride 2 up and loaded for HOURS than have something I have to take a LONG break at each fillup and then be able to enjoy myself when I arrived at my destination.
Xnavylfr(CHUCK)