I use a single large K&N like this and it works well. At the time I only had the plenum and no airbox plus a set of these huge GSXR1100 pods. I won't get into any arguments about comparisons with stock.
Just from this picture, I wonder whether this filter has and more (possibly less) filter media area than a stock paper one.
Of course the membrane type you have there could also be more porous, making raw external size comparisons less interesting.
The stock paper filter presents about 95 sq inches of the filter media to the outside world.
The Uni NU-4055 has about 27.5 sq inches presented to the outside world. Of course, it is more porous than the paper type, as it combines statistical collection as well as passage hole blockage for the membrane rather than an absolute particle size blocker like the paper type.
My K&N (below) has 43 pleat edges or 86 pleat faces of .375 x 3.25 dimension giving a presented area of about 105 sq inches.
I can easily see direct rays of light passing through the K&N membrane. So, the pore size is most definitely larger than the stock paper type, and it is clearly not a statistical type using oil and momentum to trap particles, as the Uni foam filter does.
This is as clean as I could get my K&N, by the way.
Cheers,