Rocket,
my point is IF you proclaim yourself as "...probably the smartest person in the room..."
which he did, and he continued in that vein, I just felt his attempted explanation of
seveal points were invalid; to wit, solar power is nice, looks pretty but is actually
very inefficient, costly and would not survive in the marketplace without government
subsidies, and rate fixing/gouging of ratepayers currently using cheaper forms of electrical
generation.
WATT he says?
Exactly, I say. He couldn't follow my premises and conclusions as they didn't fit into his anti-establishment, PC agenda. *
peace,
michel
*we have an disproportionate number of pompous individuals in Vermont whom enjoy spewing "facts" around when they only have a limited dataset to backup their premises to validate their invalid argument.