Author Topic: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?  (Read 1868 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GroovieGhoulie

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,753
  • I have to return some videotapes.
Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« on: June 26, 2006, 05:04:32 AM »
What sort of issues can happen with bikes with too little miles?  I mean if it only has a few hundred miles on it, that means it sat somewhere and didn't roll for a long time, which can be horrible for a machine.  I would imagine that the suspension seals and bushings and bearings are going to quickly start leaking and such when it starts being ridden, along with the front brake needing work, among other things.

Any other downside to too few miles?

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,560
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2006, 05:28:29 AM »
depending on where it sat,rust could be a major issue,including stuck engine parts.
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Offline puppytrax

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,059
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2006, 05:34:57 AM »
Any other downside to too few miles?

Rings not broken in yet??? Rust on cylinder walls??? Dry rotted tires/tubes???

...and of course...the dreaded Carb Bowl Varnish...yuch...stinky stuff...although I just dropped a bowl yesterday on a set of 627A's, and brown powder poured out...that's some *real* crappy gas!!!   ;D
...stock 1972 CB500 '500 Four' undergoing re-assembly...
...Stock 1972 CL450 'Scrambler' also being re-assembled...

smashme33

  • Guest
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2006, 07:30:01 AM »
 That's a REAL FOSSIL FUEL!

Offline turtle

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 283
  • 1980 CX500 Custom
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2006, 07:34:41 AM »
I pulled a clutch apart after the bike had sat outside for 6 years. All the fibre coating on the friction plates was stuck to the metal plates and ripped off. (Maybe a soaking in oil first could have preventd it happening?)
1972 CB350 Four
1977 CB750 K7
1979 Suzuki GT250 X7
1980 CX500 Custom
1980 CX500 Shadow
1981 CB900 Bol D'or
1982 CB750 F2



"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Offline GroovieGhoulie

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,753
  • I have to return some videotapes.
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2006, 07:44:37 AM »
I just keep thinking about that 600-mile 750 on eBay and how, while it may have been well-maintained and the engine is probably ok, I'm sure that sitting for 30 years has not been good to the seals and rolling parts.  I'll bet when it starts rolling, the fork seals, bearings and bushings will all need to be done.

Offline Pinhead

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,818
  • 1979 CB652-ST
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2006, 08:26:17 AM »
I'd oil everything. Anything that is accessable would get a good shot of WD-40 at least, if not engine oil. And the engine, keep the key off and kick it over for about 30 minutes to make sure there's oil in the upper end. If your leg ain't that strong, disconnect the spark plug wires and turn it over with the starter for a while. That's after an oil change and new oil filter.
Doug

Click --> Cheap Regulator/Rectifier for any of Honda's 3-phase charging systems (all SOHC4's).

GM HEI Ignition Conversion

Quote from: TwoTired
By the way, I'm going for the tinfoil pants...so they can't read my private thoughts.
:D

Offline Dave Wyatt

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 231
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2006, 09:41:43 AM »
I bought my Hondamatic in 1995 with 6000 miles on it.  It had not been ridden for quite a while and was kept inside, but that was about it.  The front brakes needed the caliper rebuilt, carbs had to be gone through, tires and tubes were junk, battery was shot, and the chain was stiff.  Eventually the fork seals started to leak, but switching to ATF stopped the leak.  I did lube the hell out of everything that moved and didn't have too many problems.  Although the dreaded SOHC oil weeping started a couple of thousand miles later.  I felt that was a little premature based on mileage and age was the culprit.  Somewhere around 10,000+ I found myself replacing rear wheel bearings.  I found the grease had dryed out, which led to bearing failure. 

A low mile bake has some great advantages, but it also has it's problems.  One good thing is, it is not worn out and with a few minor repairs you essentially have anew bike.
Dave Wyatt
1976 CB750A
1965 C100
2008 GL1800
I swear, the damn things are starting to breed!

smashme33

  • Guest
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2006, 10:19:33 AM »

A low mile bake has some great advantages, but it also has it's problems.  One good thing is, it is not worn out and with a few minor repairs you essentially have anew bike.
Quote



 Agreed. Remember that it is fun to work on these(don't we have a consensus on this?) bikes. Replacing and cleaning some things and oiling and greasing the crap out of everything will make a bike more like it should be. Personally, I am a lot like my grandpa, working on stuff, even if nothing is wrong. That kind of care and maintenance will help you keep your beautiful SOHC4 going longer.

Offline puppytrax

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,059
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2006, 10:28:33 AM »
...keep the key off and kick it over for about 30 minutes to make sure there's oil in the upper end. If your leg ain't that strong, disconnect the spark plug wires and turn it over with the starter for a while...

Wouldn't it be easier to pull all the spark plugs out and kick/turn it over by hand??? Turns a lot easier with no compression...   ;)
...stock 1972 CB500 '500 Four' undergoing re-assembly...
...Stock 1972 CL450 'Scrambler' also being re-assembled...

Offline Pinhead

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,818
  • 1979 CB652-ST
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2006, 10:37:33 AM »
...keep the key off and kick it over for about 30 minutes to make sure there's oil in the upper end. If your leg ain't that strong, disconnect the spark plug wires and turn it over with the starter for a while...

Wouldn't it be easier to pull all the spark plugs out and kick/turn it over by hand??? Turns a lot easier with no compression...   ;)

That'd work, too!  ;D
Doug

Click --> Cheap Regulator/Rectifier for any of Honda's 3-phase charging systems (all SOHC4's).

GM HEI Ignition Conversion

Quote from: TwoTired
By the way, I'm going for the tinfoil pants...so they can't read my private thoughts.
:D

Offline cb650

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,863
Re: Problems with REALLY low-mile bikes?
« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2006, 04:19:43 PM »
My 360 only had 4200 miles on it 4 yrs ago when I decided to start riding it.  I had it stored for 10 years.   Changed all fluids all bearings and seals and rubber. It now has 18000 on it and no problems.
Put 7000 on it in 1 year.   No engine work except normal maintenance.




                      Terry
18 grand and 18 miles dont make you a biker