Author Topic: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews  (Read 12138 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jamesb

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,167
1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« on: September 06, 2012, 03:09:57 PM »
i have a chance to trade my cb750 for one of these. are they decent bikes any problems i have the choice of this or a 1979 Yamaha XS650 special both bikes have been sitting for a couple of years but are complete. clean titles.just curious has anybody owned the honda 650
I've done a lot of things in my life that I'm not proud of...and the things I AM proud of, "are disgusting"

Offline kirkn

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,046
Re: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2012, 04:49:51 PM »
Yep, and it's one of only two or three of over 75 bikes I've owned that I wish I had back...

Offline Xnavylfr

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,102
  • Beers, Babes and bikes since 1965
Re: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2012, 05:45:41 PM »
I have always heard that the CB650s were bad about spitting cam chains causeing lots of damage. The XS650 is a good bike but it's a boke shaker!!


Xnavylfr(CHUCK)

Offline kirkn

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,046
Re: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2012, 07:29:18 AM »
To elaborate on why I liked it:

The CB650, AFAIK, is an extension of the original 500/550 motor, which is very reliable, as far as I'm concerned.  No issues there. 

The 650 has CV carbs, which I like better than 'manual' slides like the 550, but it uses the piston-style carbs rather than the diaphragm-style carbs.  I like these better, because I never had a piston fail, unlike the diaphragms.

The 82 Nighthawk 650 used the 4-into-4 exhaust, which I think looks great!  By those years, all the inline 4's seemed to have gone to 4-into-2 or 4-into-1, but I always liked the 4-into-4.

The 650 had dual disk front brakes, which was nice.

The 82 650 also had a unique set of handlebars - they were two independant bars that fit into the top triple clamp.  They were adjustable for height and for angle of pull-back.  Very nice.  The previous owner from me had them adjusted for a more cruiser-ish pullback style but I was able to adjust them to a more standard feel.  Very nice, and much easier than trial and error with a different bar.

Bottom line, it was one of the smoothest, "most refined feeling" bikes I've ridden.  Plenty powerful enough for me and still got 55 mpg!

It's almost apples-to-oranges, though.  The Yamaha is a twin, with all the advantages and disavantages with that.  And, it's a 'special' rather than the more standard style of the earlier models, with all the advantages and disadvantages of that.

You pays your money and you takes your choice...

Good luck with it, whichever way you go.  :)

Kirk

Offline fmctm1sw

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,042
Re: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2012, 07:04:13 PM »
Like kirk said, I think that was the last year for the sohc motors.  Probably the same motor (and possibly carbs) that are in my '81 cb650c.  Some folks report it (cb650c at least) needs more air and they end up modifying the air filter cover.  Mine pulls real strong but craps out around 70 mph.  I'm getting a new filter for it to see if increased air flow helps.
Quote from: 754
Dude is that a tire ? or an O-ring..??

Quote from: inkscars
This is not a pod thread
This is not a #$%* on my vacuum gauges thread
This is a help or GTFO thread.

1973 CB350F
1973 CB350G
1975 CB550K
1983 GL650I
1973 CB750K3 (http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=92888.0)
1984 Kawasaki KLT-250 (AKA 3 wheeler of death)
1994 Honda TRX300
1999 Honda TRX250

Offline cb650

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,864
Re: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2012, 07:49:15 PM »
They are a POS!!!!!!!  Sell it to me cheap!!! ;D
18 grand and 18 miles dont make you a biker

Offline Retroben

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • '78 CB550K
Re: 1982 cb650sc nighthawk reviews
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2012, 12:22:51 AM »
I can tell you a lot about the Honda. I joined this forum last year when I got a 1982 CB650SC Nighthawk for $300. It had had some work done but it needed plenty more. I rebuilt the brake calipers and m/c, cleaned the carbs (thoroughly, I thought...now I know better) replaced steering head bearing, changed the oil, lubed the chain, checked the rear brake, adjusted the clutch. I also bought a windjammer locally, found bracket on line and a set of engine guard bars,  and...rode the bike 2500 miles in 6 days from Akron OH to Grass Valley CA via Denver. The most comfortable, pleasant riding experience you could imagine on 650cc.  Those multi-adjustable bars were genius. Awesome handling and power even loaded with camping gear. Rode 750 miles the last day from Lyman, WY to Grass Valley in 15 hours of hard riding. If I knew then what I know now about tuning carbs, I'm sure I could have got way better than the 45MPG I got on the trip (70+MPH steady the last 2 days)
Things I found out:

  • The brake calipers (along with the fuel tank, body parts and seat) are a one-year, one-model part. The only caliper piston seals I could find were in the UK.
  • There is an awesome nighthawk owners site, with a carb genius named BumbleBee who is a CB650 SOHC specialist (dunno if he's on this board too under a different alias?) The site has a great test ride writeup of the '82 650 nighthawk.
  • The '82 650 was the last Honda SOHC4 sold in the US.
  • CV carbs + SOHC4 =  :)
Had to sell her in Cali, now I'm back in Ohio with a '78 550K project. I still have the headlight, nacelle, turn signals and  ears I took off to put on the Windjammer...kinda rusty but if you need replacements...