Author Topic: Polished vs Chrome engine covers  (Read 6039 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline KC_Northstar

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 388
Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« on: September 10, 2012, 10:36:17 am »
Just got off the phone with Brown's Plating.  They charge the same for polishing as chrome plating, so I am trying to decide
which way to go with my engine covers.  My 750 K2 is totally stock, but I kind of like the chrome parts on the stock engine
and I don't think it will detract much from resale value in the future.  Anyone have any opinions on chrome vs polished engine covers?   Anyone have plating or polishing done by Brown's?

http://brownsplating.com/chrome_direct.php
KC

1971 CB750-K1
1972 CB750-K2
1971 SL350-K1
1971 SL125-K0
1979 CM400A

Offline flybox1

  • My wife thinks I'm a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,301
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2012, 10:44:45 am »
definitely no expert, but just from a maintenance aspect, i would guess that a polished surface would require MORE maintenance over the years , and some sort of clear coat, to prevent oxidation and to keep its shine.
If i had a choice, i would chrome plate.
'78 750K (F3 engine) PD42b's, Modified airbox w/K&N  filter, 40/110 jets, 1 needle shim, IMS@ 1 turn out. Kerker + Cone 18" QuietCore

Past Bikes
1974 550K0 (stock), 1973 CB350F (stock), 1983 Yamaha XS400K (POS)
77/78 cool 2 member #3
"Knowledge without mileage equals bullsh!t" - Henry Rollins

"This is my CB. There are many like it, but this one is mineā€¦"

Offline NewOldSchool

  • Apprentice
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2012, 10:45:05 am »
Slightly different look with polished vs. chrome, but polished required a lot more maintenance to keep it looking shiny.
Not putting miles on your bike is like not having sex with your Girl Friend so she'll be more desirable to her next Boy Friend.

Offline CycleRanger

  • No comment about being an
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,358
  • Central Texas Shop Manual Advocate
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2012, 10:57:02 am »
Personally I don't care for chrome plated aluminum.
It's not that hard to break out a little aluminum polish now and then.

I also find it odd that they would quote the same price for polishing or plating since polishing must be done prior to plating.
And plating aluminum is a three-stage process.
Do you have a copy of the Honda Shop Manual or Parts List for your bike? Get one here:
https://www.honda4fun.com/materiale/documentazione-tecnica
CB750K5        '79 XL250s     CL350K3
CB750K3        '76 XS650      '76 CJ360T

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2012, 11:45:54 am »
Just got off the phone with Brown's Plating.  They charge the same for polishing as chrome plating, so I am trying to decide
which way to go with my engine covers.  My 750 K2 is totally stock, but I kind of like the chrome parts on the stock engine
and I don't think it will detract much from resale value in the future.  Anyone have any opinions on chrome vs polished engine covers?   Anyone have plating or polishing done by Brown's?

http://brownsplating.com/chrome_direct.php
I've hada lot of chrome done by Brown's. Mid 4 digits. Beautiful show chome. (See the later half of my build thread). They told me the same thing on polishing v chrome. Polishing is the labor intensive part, same labor for both. So they discourage, and stop the conversation, polish only by pricing it the same. I've had some local shops do the polishing, they'll do it for half the chrome price often.

I did a lot of polishing my own self. Never happy with it and won't do it again. Either local polishing or Brown's chrome.

Chrome on engine covers is controversial, but Brown's does it all the time and it lasts fine. Controvery comes from bad chrome jobs failing and discoloring or chipping. Also some think chrome on the engine will make it run hotter. Never seen the proof though.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2012, 11:48:20 am by MCRider »
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline jamesb

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,167
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2012, 12:57:03 pm »
i took my chrome covers off my 750 they suck. polished is the way to go.i polished my cases on my cb550 it holds a good polish yes you will have to stay on top of it but i think it is better.as far as the heat goes i think the 750 runs cooler with the polished covers it's just like when you put all the chrome stuff on a v8. i can tell the difference when sitting at a light that the polished aluminum is running cooler than the chrome plated aluminum.
I've done a lot of things in my life that I'm not proud of...and the things I AM proud of, "are disgusting"

Offline 754

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,058
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2012, 06:44:29 pm »
 Polished is extra work.. chrome..wash with soapy water, rinse blow off with air..done..now you are riding.
 If you want chrome, pay the guys that do it right..
Maker of the WELDLESS 750 Frame Kit
dodogas99@gmail.com
Kelowna B.C.       Canada

My next bike will be a ..ANFOB.....

It's All part of the ADVENTURE...

73 836cc.. Green, had it for 3 decades!!
Lost quite a few CB 750's along the way

Offline CycleRanger

  • No comment about being an
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,358
  • Central Texas Shop Manual Advocate
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2012, 06:48:04 pm »

I've had a lot of chrome done by Brown's. Mid 4 digits. Beautiful show chome. (See the later half of my build thread). They told me the same thing on polishing v chrome. Polishing is the labor intensive part, same labor for both. So they discourage, and stop the conversation, polish only by pricing it the same. I've had some local shops do the polishing, they'll do it for half the chrome price often.

I did a lot of polishing my own self. Never happy with it and won't do it again. Either local polishing or Brown's chrome.

Chrome on engine covers is controversial, but Brown's does it all the time and it lasts fine. Controvery comes from bad chrome jobs failing and discoloring or chipping. Also some think chrome on the engine will make it run hotter. Never seen the proof though.

Yeah, that makes some sense, it's the initial polish that takes the time & skill. I polish my own stuff, it's not as good as a pro job by any means and I hate doing it but I'm cheap. ;)
Do you have a copy of the Honda Shop Manual or Parts List for your bike? Get one here:
https://www.honda4fun.com/materiale/documentazione-tecnica
CB750K5        '79 XL250s     CL350K3
CB750K3        '76 XS650      '76 CJ360T

Offline BobbyR

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,367
  • Proud Owner of the Babe Thread & Dirty Old Man
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2012, 06:56:13 pm »
Good Chrome is good. Good polish is good. Sounds conflicting but they do look quite different. Chrome can look too flashy and shallow. Well polished aluminum has a depth to it you cannot get with chrome. Once you have a good polished cover, keeping it up is a quick rubdown with Mothers in the spring and fall. You may want pass a wheel over it every couple of years.

It really depends on the look you want. Chrome has to be polished also.
Dedicated to Sgt. Howard Bruckner 1950 - 1969. KIA LONG KHANH.

But we were boys, and boys will be boys, and so they will. To us, everything was dangerous, but what of that? Had we not been made to live forever?

Offline Stev-o

  • Ain't no
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 34,108
  • Central Texas
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2012, 07:29:36 pm »
I bought my K4 with a plated head cover and do not like it.  When the motor gets pulled, it will be replaced with the polished cover on the shelf. 

BTW, I also have a plated head cover on the shelf if your interested.
'74 "Big Bang" Honda 750K [836].....'76 Honda 550F.....K3 Park Racer!......and a Bomber!............plus plus plus.........

Offline Johnie

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,591
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2012, 07:32:38 pm »
Agreed...it depends on the look you want. The high chrome looks good if you are not going stock. My 750's are all stock so I have polished all my covers myself and use no clear. That way I can touch it up whenver I want too. As of yet, I have only touched it up with semi chrome polish and it still looks good. Granted it is dirty and tedious, but the end result is great. Plus I have the satisfaction of doing it myself and the cost is minimal...1 Sears buffer, three 6 inch cotton wheels, red, green, white rouge, time and patience.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2012, 07:36:07 pm by Johnie »
1970 CB750K0 - Candy Ruby Red
1973 CB750K3 - Candy Bacchus Olive or Sunflake Orange
1970 Chevy Chevelle SS396 - Cortez Silver
1976 GL1000 Sulphur Yellow

Oshkosh, WI  USA

Offline killersoundz

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2012, 07:32:49 pm »
I bought my K4 with a plated head cover and do not like it.  When the motor gets pulled, it will be replaced with the polished cover on the shelf. 

BTW, I also have a plated head cover on the shelf if your interested.

How much for the chrome plated valve cover??? :D   msg me
My project thread:

http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=107447.0

My CB750K4 Starting up for the first time after a seized motor and rebuild!


Offline KC_Northstar

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 388
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2012, 08:40:44 am »
Anyone have a picture of a stock 750K with chrome engine covers?
KC

1971 CB750-K1
1972 CB750-K2
1971 SL350-K1
1971 SL125-K0
1979 CM400A

Offline mono

  • Definitely no
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,271
  • 1975 Honda CB550, 1978 CB750K (in progress)
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2012, 10:19:18 am »
yeah, polishing the aluminum yourself is initially very labor-intensive, but if you keep up with it, it involves minimal maintenance.  that said, chrome involves nearly NO maintenance, so... there's that.


Offline speedy gonzalais

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2012, 11:27:16 am »
polished.
82' C90
87' yamaha T80
79' CB125T/CD200 project
82' CB650z
80s kawasaki ae50/150cc project
92' Suzuki GSXR600
80' CB250N

Markcb750

  • Guest
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2012, 03:57:16 pm »
I prefer the look of polished..it just takes work.


Offline Stev-o

  • Ain't no
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 34,108
  • Central Texas
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2012, 04:06:42 pm »
Anyone have a picture of a stock 750K with chrome engine covers?

Not a great pic and my engine def needs some TLC, but this shows a chrome head cover and polished stator and shifter covers.


'74 "Big Bang" Honda 750K [836].....'76 Honda 550F.....K3 Park Racer!......and a Bomber!............plus plus plus.........

Offline Steel CB650C

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Polished vs Chrome engine covers
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2012, 07:43:00 pm »
Its all good I perfer the polish but the crome is ok
Ride for fun.