Author Topic: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings  (Read 1778 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wowbagger

  • Not much of an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« on: March 11, 2013, 11:36:40 AM »
With my exhaust for my 1971 CB500 out getting ceramic coated I'm about to order new rings but noticed the ones at z1enterprises.com are not the stock copper rings. What are the differences between using copper or these others? Is one better than the other?

http://www.z1enterprises.com/ItemDetails.aspx?itemDescription=Exhaust+Gasket+CB550+XL600+VF750+GL1500&item=KL16-5976-1

Thanks,
Scott
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 01:49:53 PM by wowbagger »

Offline Deltarider

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,126
  • ... but some animals are more equal than others.
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2013, 12:34:18 PM »
I don't know about those, but I still have some old white gasket rings, white from asbestos.
I have no intention to use them. You can have them.  :D
CB500K2-ED Excel black
"There is enough for everyone's need but not enough for anybody's greed."

Offline wowbagger

  • Not much of an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2013, 12:37:51 PM »
Thanks but no.  ;D

Offline wowbagger

  • Not much of an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2013, 03:47:35 PM »
So, no one's tried the z1 gaskets? Maybe the silence is my answer and I should just stick with copper.

Offline Smoke Detector

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2013, 05:51:55 PM »
I've used them, they were easy to install and made a good seal, but I don't have enough miles on them to have info about durability/longevity. It's a fabric-looking green core (couldn't be asbestos I don't think, but looks like it) with a thin metal ring on inside and outside which crushes when installed.
1972 CB500K1
"Preserve nature. Always wear a helmet. Think safety."

Offline 70CB750

  • Labor omnia vincit improbus.
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,802
  • Northern Virginia
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2013, 04:01:22 AM »
You know asbestos is not curare, it does not kill on touch.  There has to be some extended exposure to do any harm.
Prokop
_______________
Pure Gas - find ethanol free gas station near you

I love it when parts come together.

Dorothy - my CB750
CB750K3F - The Red
Sidecar


CB900C

2006 KLR650

Offline wowbagger

  • Not much of an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2013, 04:23:21 AM »
Yeah, I'm well aware of the exposure levels for asbestos. I own three apartment buildings that were built before 1930. I don't touch it and it won't kill me. ;)

Offline Toxic

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,200
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2013, 04:31:27 AM »
I have used those rings for many years and they seal very well.  I would recommend them.
While I have no proof, I believe they crush better therefore make a better seal than the copper ones.

Offline IndyFour

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2013, 09:50:09 AM »
I have those new rings on my bike as well.  IIRC they were layers of some blue material and aluminum.  They work fine.  The only reason I got them is because the bike shop was out of the copper type at the time.  Guy at the shop claimed that these newer ones have the benefit of being able to kind-of "fluff" back up after being compressed....so if you take your exhaust on and off a few times, they can still be reused.  Can't attest to that as my pipes have never come back off since then. 
1974 CB550K
2000 VFR800FIY
__________________
Indianapolis, Indiana

Offline Chachi

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 713
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2013, 12:42:29 PM »
Exhaust powder coated or ceramic coated?
73 CB750 K3
72 CB500 K1 - Sold
75 MR50 Elsinore K1

Offline wowbagger

  • Not much of an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2013, 01:48:07 PM »
ceramic coating. It's an exhaust. I probably should have stated that correctly from the start. [EDIT: corrected original post]
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 02:03:12 PM by wowbagger »

Offline Chachi

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 713
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2013, 06:13:18 PM »
OK good. I've heard good things about it, but never had it done. What price range is it in?
73 CB750 K3
72 CB500 K1 - Sold
75 MR50 Elsinore K1

Offline wowbagger

  • Not much of an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2013, 06:22:17 PM »
I'm having them media blast my 4-1 exhaust, the 4 flanges and the 8 collar pieces then ceramic coat the exhaust all for about $225. Usually, just ceramic coating costs around $100-150 depending on where you are. I'll post pics once I get it back.

Offline bjbuchanan

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,276
Re: Copper exhaust rings v. non-copper rings
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2013, 07:21:48 PM »
From the description that you guys are talking about of the non copper rings they sound like exhaust packings for older cars. I had a corvair that used exhaust packing, it seals well. I guess its a matter of choice
The dirty girl-1976 cb750k, Ebay 836, Tracy bodykit
Round top carbs w/ 38 pilots, middle needle position, airscrew 7/8ths out, 122 main jet
Stock airbox w/ drop in K&N, Hooker 4-1

Don't trust me alone with a claw hammer and some pliers