There are few that can build an engine as well as Honda. Honda has had lot's of practice, test subjects, and experience. Before you try to improve on what they did, you might consider that. No doubt you can learn to do those things. But, mistakes can be costly for random meddlers or taking cues from unknowledgeable well meaners. A fully equipped shop to refurbish every component in the engine is going to cost more than ten complete bikes. More often that not, simply fixing what is broke, will get you many miles down the road and the best ROI.
The best example that repeatedly happens, is when a curious person dismantles an operating Cb550 engine, and ignores the warnings in the shop manual about cylinder cover installation, cranks down the cylinder cover bolts, and bends several of what used to be good valve stems, and cracking the valve guides. All that "work" and the engine no longer operates, without hundreds of dollars in new valves and guides, or a replacement cylinder head.
If you have leaky gaskets, that you simply can't live with, replace the gaskets. The "while-I'm-in-here" syndrome can become quite costly (as well as educating).
Nothing wrong with wanting a brand new 1978 Honda. But, few want to spend the time and money to actually build one to new specs.
Even new bikes are not perfect, btw. There is a reason that warranty's limit repairs to correcting what is broke and not include a reset to zero wear of the entire machine.
Having said all that, there is certainly value to education, and there is a rationale that supports sacrificing the entire machine to achieve that goal. But, that would also leave one less intact antique available to the general populace.
Down from soapbox, now. Good luck!