Geez mate, that's no good, you must have bought a Lemon, I did a check on the S1000RR owners site and there are plenty of guys who've done reasonably high mileage with either no issues, or only minor issues:
http://www.s1000rrforum.com/forum/bmw-s1000rr-general-discussion/15069-s-1000-rr-reliable-3.html
Interestingly, they're saying that BMW offers a 3 year/36000 mile warranty on the S1000RR, (the longest warranty of any motorcycle manufacturer, currently) so I'm surprised that you've had so many problems where you've had to pay for your repairs?
Anyway, no, there's no way I'd trade a new Norton 961 for your BMW, as much as I like them, yours doesn't sound like a bike that I'd like to own............
Although my RR is a U.S. bike, being stationed in Germany you only enjoy a two-year warranty (while it would be three years in the States). My U.S. spec cars get the same treatment. I did purchase the extended warranty (aka insurance). That is why you cannot do anything yourself or you void the warranty/insurance terms.
The 2010 model had issues with the camshafts because of a flaw in the manufacturing process (i.e., hardening process). BMW knew that very well. After just introducing the bike into the market, BMW did not want to do a recall. The customers suffer. Most cam shafts went bad in 2010. The one used by "Motorrad," the leading German motorcycle magazine, suffered the same fate. What is unusual is that mine lasted as long as it did. Not to issue a recall was poor policy on the part of BMW. But what is also upsetting is that they would only replace one cam shaft after it failed. So, three months later, the other one went bad.
As far as the RR forums go, I am with the German and American forums since 2010. Both forums reported the cam failures. Then there was the problem with loose con rod bolts in the 2012 models--BMW issued a recall as this was a real safety hazard. Failure of the handlebar switches was a very common problem since 2009--not just on the RR. Mine were replaced twice. Only now has BMW issued the policy that, if one switch goes bad, both will be replaced. Transmission troubles, blown engines, and lately drive chains that tear apart, are all but unheard of. Since all my other bikes have been older than my 77 Honda, I don't know if there is a specific problem with the RR, or if this is just the way it is with sport bikes these days. Perhaps it is common these days.
In the American forum is just now another thread (there were plenty before) regarding reliability. But when people claim they pass others with speeds of more than 200 mph, then their experiences are not credible. The bike is not capable of that speed==and I am in the position to drive at these speeds legally every day if I so desire and could. With a small-shouldered boy, the RR might reach 305 kmh. But that is for the initial model like mine with a lighter crankshaft and a final drive geared towards V-max (yet, I cannot reach that speed and the speedometer stops at 299kmh). Or, alternatively, the tests in a variety of countries got it all wrong all the time. That is to say, I bet that a lot of people that post don't even own one. And the posts in the U.S. forum often make me wonder if some ten-year old got hold of a computer (as the guy with the over 200 mph who also admits dropping the bike when coming to a stop--the part I gladly believe). Finally, in both forums people seem to first blame the owner, then the shop but never the bike or BMW if others have problems. There is always a great deal of hostility when one posts a negative experience. I guess, when your life is so meaningless that you have to get some value by completely identifying with a product, then any criticism of the product is a personal attack. Those are the customers corporations love. Knowing quite a few RR owners, I can safely say that many hardly ever take their bike out of the garage. I probably do more mileage in one week than they do all year. I use mine exclusively for long-distance touring. And I do drive the Alps in the wintertime. In the summer time, I pass those world-travelling GS models--being hauled south on a trailer. Or people take the bike on the train down to Italy because they couldn't possibly drive 8 hours (while my travelling days have 12 hours, or like the recent one, 17 hours due to yet another cam failure). When I want to ride my bike in the wintertime in Spain, I need neither an air plane ticket nor a rental bike. Not sure about the bikes, but the riders I meet today are cut out differently from what I am used to (the word "pussies" seems to be adequate to describe many of them). So, I guess, if you only drive occasionally, and you are busy putting carbon on the bike and take pictures of it on a sunny day, or you only use the RR to drive in circles, you might not have as much trouble with the BMW as I had.
Again, what I find most disappointing is the way BMW deals with these problems. Causing me a great deal of inconvenience, they never apologized. Nor would they even pay for new oil or filter after the engine repair. How cheap is that? I still like the bike, but I am no friend of BMW.
Anyway, did a nice tour last weekend. No engine problems this time. But I can't wait to do this with my Honda again. The K7 will be ready in December, but I will not take it out while there is salt on the road since it corrodes while you watch if you do. So it will be the RR until March most likely.
So, sorry for the late reply, and all the best,
Tom
This is what I was up to last weekend (trips like that make me forget all the troubles for a while):