I'll say up front, that I believe a tour or ride organized though this forum should involve at least one SOHC4. The mascot should be carried on a bike falling under this forum's namesake. That's my opinion/vote. I don't see the point, otherwise.
I'll inject here that I think if you participate in the tour group with an SOHC4, you should get to actually carry the mascot for some portion of the tour. The mascot carrier should don the responsibility for seeing to it that a non-carrier get his or her chance.
If you are just going to ride along with a designated SOHC4 mascot carrier, what does it matter if you show up on the ride with an SOHC4?
Perhaps a goal should be how many different bikes carry the mascot? Just a thought.
Viewpoint on the GZ tour experience related to the decline of participation:
I participated in the first GZ tour. I had some fun, and it was overall positive, and the guys were all great to be around... had laughs The riding was much more aggressive than I had anticipated, though.
I would have participated in the second tour if my arthritic hips would have cooperated. It was greatly aggravated by the Corbin seat I was testing leading up to that ride. The pain comes and goes, some rides it's ok, on others I can't get off the bike fast enough to walk around and get the pain to subside. Anyway, I was relegated to at-the-moment availability, and an unreliable participant. Plans were made without me, which is perfectly understandable, schedules to meet and all that. I didn't want to wet blanket the activity with invalidic concerns. Maybe next year...
2013 saw the same (core) riders in my area heading the organization tour. (This is not a complaint, only observation.) Initially, I wanted to participate. But, then realized that the "ride leader" was forming to be the same as who set the riding pace in the first tour, which was pretty aggressive. 20 years ago I would have reveled in such a ride. I can still ride pretty fast if I need to. But, I just don't need to. And, I rather enjoy looking about where I travel as opposed to just the tarmac my tires will encounter ahead of me 100% of the time. I certainly won't add risk or race on unfamiliar roads with unknown surface conditions. Now, I have no intention or desire for disparaging anyone else's riding style. But, to share the fun, means it should be fun for those that are sharing. If my hips would cooperate, I was mentally ready for a 600-800 mile tour over 2-3 days. But, my interest evaporated at the prospect of a 600-800 mile race over 2-3 days. And, I have no desire to be a rapid package deliverer. I withdrew, as it became clear I would just slow down, probably frustrate, the other riders interested, and kill their fun.
I can't say why others would decline participation. This is just one viewpoint and explanation.
For 2014 I ask, how would/could it be different? Do all group rides necessarily turn into road races? It seems that almost every group ride I've been on does. BTDT Perhaps I'm just too old and worn out to be included.
Carry on...