So after reading all of the above that is saying my K4 should have the 18/48 combo correct? Now say i want to get max punch ouf of my bike mostly for in town riding would i be better off with the 17/48?
Sorry 'bout the delay: I've been under the car hoods again...
I really like the 17/48 combo in commuter driving. I have to ride 20+ miles one way to work, half in stop-go traffic lights and half on interstates at up to 80 MPH. The 17/48 lets me ride 1 gear higher than "normal" in the t'lights areas, which helps keep the engine a little cooler and not so busy. It does wind a bit more on the highway, but the throttle response is better, too, in high gear. It pulls about 128 MPH tops in 17/48 in nearly any conditions, about 131 tops in 18/48 on a flat, windless road. I've always felt the 18/48 was more for Honda's warranty benefit and for those who wanted a little less noise at 55 MPH, which happened right about the time the K3 came out. On mine (in 18/48 trim), I always could get better MPG at 55 MPH, 2-up, loaded in 4th gear than in 5th gear. I had to get up to 62 MPH to stop "rowing" through gears in hilly country this way, and 65+ to get the same MPG that I got at 55 MPH in 4th. That's my observations that lead to my "overgearing" position. I've also found that the K4-K6 owners I've ridden with also had similar results, but those bikes only made about 40 HP on the ground.
Guys I know who added cams with slightly more duration (not more lift) would get better results in the 4000 RPM range with the 18/48 combos in high gear, heavily loaded. Now that mine is rebuilt with something like this (.020" less lift than stock cam, but +4 degrees duration on the intakes, stock on the exhaust side), I really notice a strong difference in the 3k-4k range in high gear with the 17/48 setup. Of course, mine is a hemi, too....