I have each U.S. model of Cb550F. I've had the carbs apart for each of them, and the internals are no different among them. They are all 069A carbs.
The EPA mandate was a request before 1978. The F model could not meet the 1978 requirements and so was dropped from US distribution. I have nothing to document a carb change for bikes outside of the U.S.
My F2 sure seems like it is the fastest of my Cb550 F models, and is all stock apart from a windshield and tail rack. I have not track timed them or dyno'd them. But, it sure is noticeable going from the 76 to the 77. I have no explanation for it.
There used to be a saying that you wanted a production model from a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday production when it was all routine. You didn't want a Monday machne as the workers were all grumpy. And Friday machines had the workers thinking about the weekend instead of their jobs. There is also the production tolerance variances to consider. Not all the parts are in the middle of the specification range, yet they can still be made into a good machine. However, every few examples can just happen to be put together with parts at the extreme end acceptance. While not exactly a lemon, it doesn't produce the best machine and may not operate like the average machine. Conversely, it is possible to have a machine assembled with just the right parts tolerances, making it exceptional among the production run.
My 77CB550 F2 (see current avatar), just may be one of those machines, as it seems to be faster and have more power than any of my other 550's, which all behave more or less the same as each other. I'm not taking it apart to find out, I just enjoy what it is. I wonder about the cam profile, though.