You are IT&T, Trad; to each their own. And I'm sure Dustin builds a very good bike. However, there is no denying the structural value of the fender brace. It ties both sides together AND offers support for a 2-up riding condition. Now, a solo seat removes that need, but, it doesn't lessen the structural value of the brace.
Many people believe that a brace or gusset needs to be thick, burly and bulky. They do not. The fender brace, if I recall correctly, is stamped but also ribbed. This ribbing provides extra support.
Case in point, an underbody rock shield on off road vehicles. You can put a 1/2" thick piece of steel there. A rock will puncture it and it will deform from impact. Replace it with a 1/4" sheet, BUT, punch holes in, and becomes about 6x as strong as the 1/2". It's not the mass, it's the structural design.
I say none of this to persuade you either direction, only to provide insight. Personally, on my 550 build I removed the rear triangular brace and have received enormous negative feedback.BUT, I know from a design and structure perspective, it's not needed. So I'm good with designs that eliminate need, but my recommendation would be to tie the two legs back together with 1/2x1" flat stock. It will never been seen, and can even provide a mounting brace to attach your seat to. It will hide within the thickness of the seat tube, and provide everything back, and then some.
Any way you go, ride safely and cognitive the build.