I surely don't want to start an argument about mild steel, CrMo, or Reynolds tubing for frame construction because I'm no expert. Often we hear of 20lb weight losses comparing OEM vs aftermarket. I have read that tubing strength between the options are actually quite similar. If frame builders use thinner wall tube, it will be lighter, but theoretically more prone to flex if the design remains the same as stock. Denis Curtis tells me Chromoly is his tubing of choice that it is stronger so thinner wall is possible considering the design is different. I'll not disagree with him! Several here including Rob (Voxonda) thinks the CB750 frame is actually quite a good frame. Certainly the British motorcycle industry made different claims!
Don you mentioned how my chassis mods would be lighter, but that's not the case. Actually the steering head/backbone part removed was replaced with more tubing, so the weight is practically identical, but stiffness is improved plus we were able to change the rake which is what I wanted. The swingarm weighs only one pound less than the stocker too. It is without question much stronger than the original though. Denis thought if he were to build a complete frame it might be 12-15lbs lighter than stock.
Cal, I believe the stock frame is 44lbs including the arm?? After removing unneeded frame bits like brackets, stands, etc. then welding the brackets I needed on - I saved 10lbs from stock.
Sorry to stray. I'll be watching the swingarm construction with interest.