Author Topic: fuel economy  (Read 1661 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bitsa750

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
fuel economy
« on: June 29, 2014, 05:21:10 PM »
I wonder what accounts for the marked improvement in fuel economy for the later K series 750's over the earlier ones.
I have a K2 with an 810 kit running 105 main jets, it gets about 210km from 13 litres before it hits reserve.Other K2's in my club get about the same.
A friend with a K6 [with accelerator pump carbs] goes over 300km before reserve. I believe the k6's also had higher compression pistons, is this so? I wonder which of these changes accounts for the improved mileage, or if it's a synergy of them that makes the difference?
Pete

Offline Schnell

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,002
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2014, 07:04:46 PM »
Is the tank capacity the same?
A good traveller has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving. --Lao Tsu

primary: 1974 Honda CB750
long term, now resting: 1981 BMW R100/7
project: 1971 Honda CL350
project: 1974 Honda CB450

previous:
1975 Honda CB750
1973 BMW R90/6
1981 Suzuki GS650
1973 Honda CD175

My little website: http://frankfoto.jimdo.com/

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2014, 09:49:01 PM »
I don't know what was available in Oz.
But in the US, accel pump carbs (PD type) were introduced in 1977 (K7/F2).  The change was instigated by the EPA's desire to reduce hydrocarbon emissions and drive engines to be more frugal with the fuel they consumed.  The laws went into effect in 1978, which was the last year of the production CB750 SOHC4.  Following models from Honda saw the switch over to CV type carbs, and then fuel injection as the emission standards became more restrictive.

For the most part, it worked.

But, for a more precise determination, fuel consumption is tallied by distance per quantity of fuel used.  This rules out factors of tank size, and/or the height of the stand pipe in the tank where reserve must be selected.
Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline CB750F2

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 645
  • Pat's first Honda 750 F2
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2014, 10:11:26 PM »
Pete. There are many variables that have an impact on fuel economy - driving style, gearing, state of tune, motor condition etc. I am pretty sure that the accelerator pump type carbs were not fitted to the 750s until 1977 so it seems that your friend with the K6 has fitted a set of carbs from a later model.
I suggest that you carry out the 3000.00 km tune up and then go from there. I have not checked my fuel consumption recently but when I did it was approx. 5L/100km - highway use. The bike at that stage was a 1978 F2 - standard bore. I have since bored it out to 836 and I do not know the fuel consumption. Pat
Regards
Pat from Australia

Offline Deltarider

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,109
  • First round...
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2014, 11:25:20 PM »
This 'EPA' thing, is that a federal thing? Could it be that prior to 1978 a state like California already had legislation in place to reduce pollution by cars and motorcycles? Does anyone remember?
« Last Edit: June 29, 2014, 11:29:20 PM by Deltarider »
CB500K2-ED Excel black
"There is enough for everyone's need but not enough for anybody's greed."

Offline Retro Rocket

  • Eggs are hard due too a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 19,279
  • ROCK & ROLL
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2014, 02:47:26 AM »
Pete. There are many variables that have an impact on fuel economy - driving style, gearing, state of tune, motor condition etc. I am pretty sure that the accelerator pump type carbs were not fitted to the 750s until 1977 so it seems that your friend with the K6 has fitted a set of carbs from a later model.
I suggest that you carry out the 3000.00 km tune up and then go from there. I have not checked my fuel consumption recently but when I did it was approx. 5L/100km - highway use. The bike at that stage was a 1978 F2 - standard bore. I have since bored it out to 836 and I do not know the fuel consumption. Pat

You are correct Pat, the K6 didn't have accelerator pumps on the carbs....

Welcome Bitsa..  ;)
750 K2 1000cc
750 F1 970cc
750 Bitsa 900cc
If You can't fix it with a hammer, You've got an electrical problem.

Offline Bailgang

  • Scott
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,705
  • Indiana
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2014, 03:05:34 AM »
This 'EPA' thing, is that a federal thing? Could it be that prior to 1978 a state like California already had legislation in place to reduce pollution by cars and motorcycles? Does anyone remember?

The Environmental Protection Agency is a federal agency and was founded in late 1970 so they no doubt played a factor in California pollution legislation prior to 78.
Scott


71 cb350 twin
77 cb750 F2
83 gl1100 Interstate

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2014, 09:54:53 AM »
I lived in California through the CARB and EPA mess during the 70s, 80s, 90s, etc.  (We are unable to dissolve agencies once they have been established.  We can only add more of them and increase their size and purview of these bureaucracies.)
Anyway, California kinda started the whole thing with instantiating "smog laws" on cars and trucks.  Attacking the biggest contributors to smog first.  Fed politician's simply adopted a new "cause" to rally popular support and ride the voter swell of "righteousness" into office, and resulting in the creation of the EPA.

The California version of history is here.  Some of it is interesting.  Start at the bottom of the timeline.   http://www.arb.ca.gov/html/brochure/history.htm

Motorcycles were ignored in the earlier years, but the EPA included them in their 1977 law, which became enforceable for the 1978 models.  Honda tried to meet the upcoming standards early and show cooperation with fed agencies.  So, many mechanical changes were introduced on earlier model, like crankcase gas scavenging and later, lean burn idle operation for 77.

California did drive earlier "smog control" efforts.  Then the big dog Feds came in to show who was the "boss" of the nation, allowing California a "waiver" to enact more restrictive laws.
Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline RJ CB450

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 216
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2014, 09:59:15 AM »
Sneaking into this thread, see some nice mileage numbers.  Makes me wonder if my 82 650 fuel economy seems meh.  I seem to be about 7.7L/100km/30.5mpg  mix seems good.  Guess need to recheck and tuneup. 140km safe range city riding is kinda  :o I guess?
74 CB450 K7 Supersport, 82 CB650sc Nighthawk, 1982 CBX 1000, 2015 Tiger XCx.... And some ol minibike with a 5hp Briggs.

Offline Lostboy Steve

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,096
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2014, 11:56:15 AM »
My MPG's (which is aggravatingly THE buzz word of the last decade) are good enough for me to not care, or worry.
On another note, if you want OPTIMAL Miles per Gallon, Google "Vapor Carburetor".
1968 Honda Z50
1977 Honda CB550K
2018 Indian Scout

Offline KRONUS0100

  • MAD MATT THE MANIAC
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,217
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2014, 04:13:16 AM »
1976 cb750f........................fitted with k8 tank...........5 gallons
just ran her bone dry to the tune of 42mpg.   didnt get 15 miles out of the reserve tho..............thought reserve was at least 20 to 25 miles.
MATT
current bikes:  1976 CB750F, 1981 GS1100E
bikes owned:1981 GL1100I, 1990 GS500E, 1981 GS850, 1977 and 1979 GS750, 1974 CB750, 1975 CB750, and a 1982 GS750E

Offline lrutt

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 916
Re: fuel economy
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2014, 10:21:57 AM »
seem all my bikes get about the same, solidly mid to upper 40's. Except the 305 dream which gets almost 60. but all the others, 750's, 650 triumphs, etc. etc. etc. all are solidly in the 40's. Just seems a sweet spot for most bikes.
06 Harley Sporster 1200C, 06 Triumph Scrambler, 01 Ducati Chromo 900, 01 Honda XR650L, 94 Harley Heritage, 88 Honda Hawk GT, 84 Yamaha Virago 1000, 78 Honda 750K w/sidecar, 77 Moto Guzzi Lemans 850, 76 Honda CB750K, 73 Norton 850, 73 Honda Z50, 70 & 65 Honda Trail 90, 70 & 71 Triumph 650s, 65 Honda 305 Dream, 81 Honda 70 Passport, 70 Suzuki T250II, 71 Yamaha 360 RT1B, 77 BMW R75/7, 75 Honda CB550K, 70 Honda CT70