Author Topic: Hondabond differences  (Read 9595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Davidov

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 284
  • 1978 CB750 F3
    • My CB750F project log
Hondabond differences
« on: July 09, 2014, 07:39:00 AM »
I have Loctite brand "Gray RTV silicone" which shows to be an OEM equivalent to Hondabond, but only Hondabond HT. It does not mention Hondabond 4.
http://www.loctite.ph/php/content_data/LT4409_AAM.pdf

Same with Permatex brand "gray sealant"
http://www.itwpf.com.au/permatex/pdfs/approvals/7.pdf

Then there's this Acura service bulletin
http://www.acuralegendwiki.org/images/d/d6/AcuraServiceNews_1998-03.pdf
It states to not use Hondabond 4 on gasketless surfaces...but HondaMan uses Honda/Yama bond 4 in his book.

I say the Loctite version is just fine.
Clear as mud right? Did I just start a dreaded "oil thread"?
-David

Offline flybox1

  • My wife thinks I'm a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,289
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2014, 08:40:09 AM »
I'd stay away from the RTV sealants.  Flaking off and clogging oil jets would be a worry to me.   
Threebond 1184 has been used by many here with success.  I used it last time I sealed cases, and I will use it again. 
Light gray matches OEM case color.
'78 750K (F3 engine) PD42b's, Modified airbox w/K&N  filter, 40/110 jets, 1 needle shim, IMS@ 1 turn out. Kerker + Cone 18" QuietCore

Past Bikes
1974 550K0 (stock), 1973 CB350F (stock), 1983 Yamaha XS400K (POS)
77/78 cool 2 member #3
"Knowledge without mileage equals bullsh!t" - Henry Rollins

"This is my CB. There are many like it, but this one is mine…"

Offline fmctm1sw

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,042
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2014, 02:52:37 PM »
I'd stay away from the RTV sealants.  Flaking off and clogging oil jets would be a worry to me.   
Threebond 1184 has been used by many here with success.  I used it last time I sealed cases, and I will use it again. 
Light gray matches OEM case color.

Yeah.. worms.  I think my threebond is yellow though?  Now I'll have to look when I get home...
Quote from: 754
Dude is that a tire ? or an O-ring..??

Quote from: inkscars
This is not a pod thread
This is not a #$%* on my vacuum gauges thread
This is a help or GTFO thread.

1973 CB350F
1973 CB350G
1975 CB550K
1983 GL650I
1973 CB750K3 (http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=92888.0)
1984 Kawasaki KLT-250 (AKA 3 wheeler of death)
1994 Honda TRX300
1999 Honda TRX250

Offline DavePhipps

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,150
  • Reading the entire Hi-Perf forum
    • Hillside Technology
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2014, 03:07:21 PM »
I  heard that the suzuki 1207B is better from all the honda mechanics that I've met.
http://www.amazon.com/Suzuki-Performance-Liquid-Gasket-1207B/dp/B002Q3KW7U
Bikes:
90 FZR600 RA
74 CB550k
78 GL1000
72 CB500K

Offline Trad

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 948
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2014, 03:57:47 PM »
Why not just get Hondabond and save the worry for something else? Not trying to be condescending at all. I was in the same debate and I just spent the extra.
74 CB550 Build: NOS-GUTTED-OEMplus-HOLDTRUE
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,130575.0.html

Offline Davidov

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 284
  • 1978 CB750 F3
    • My CB750F project log
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2014, 08:09:40 AM »
I'm going with Threebond.

The data sheet for Hondabond calls the chemincal oxy-something-something, where the Permatex/Loctite is still a silicone product.
It's really a substitute, not a direct replacement for Yama/Honda/Suzu/Three bond.
-David

Offline bjbuchanan

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,274
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2014, 10:37:47 AM »
You can also use permatex non hardening sealant, available at almost all auto parts stores, easier to source. It is non hardening like yama, hondabond, threebond. Only difference is that the permatex seems to set just a little faster.

Not a big deal if you apply it when you are actually ready to put the stuff together. I used it on my cases and cam tower pucks with good results. It is recommended in Hondaman/Mark Paris book as a substitute if that helps too
The dirty girl-1976 cb750k, Ebay 836, Tracy bodykit
Round top carbs w/ 38 pilots, middle needle position, airscrew 7/8ths out, 122 main jet
Stock airbox w/ drop in K&N, Hooker 4-1

Don't trust me alone with a claw hammer and some pliers

Offline lucky

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,715
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2014, 10:43:04 AM »
I have Loctite brand "Gray RTV silicone" which shows to be an OEM equivalent to Hondabond, but only Hondabond HT. It does not mention Hondabond 4.
http://www.loctite.ph/php/content_data/LT4409_AAM.pdf

Same with Permatex brand "gray sealant"
http://www.itwpf.com.au/permatex/pdfs/approvals/7.pdf

Then there's this Acura service bulletin
http://www.acuralegendwiki.org/images/d/d6/AcuraServiceNews_1998-03.pdf
It states to not use Hondabond 4 on gasketless surfaces...but HondaMan uses Honda/Yama bond 4 in his book.

I say the Loctite version is just fine.
Clear as mud right? Did I just start a dreaded "oil thread"?

Do not use RTV Silicone!


The original gasket sealer used at almost every motorcycle shop was Gaskacinch and is still available.

Yamabond and Hondabond are copies of Gaskacinch. EXACTLY

When I see any color of RTV Silicone on a motorcycle engine I know a beginner was working on it. I immediately have to investigate and clean that stuff off so it does not get loose inside the engine and plug up an oil gallery.

Honda cars and Honda motorcycles are apples and oranges.
I was a Dealership Honda motorcycle mechanic and there was no OEM gasket sealer.
All the shops used Gaskacinch.


On the engine cases just apply to each engine case half,
when dry, assemble the cases.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2014, 10:53:52 AM by lucky »

Offline mazingerzeca

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 587
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2014, 10:56:12 AM »
I used Threebond 1104 on my first rebuilts. It worked perfectly, no worms, good adherence to the crankcases, perfect sealing on no gasket surfaces, no oil leaks. When I finished the tube, I couldn't find 1104 any more. I bought Threebond 1104 NEO, not the same stuff, it doesn't adhere to the surfaces the same way, is more liquid and you have to wait too much for it to dry.

Offline flybox1

  • My wife thinks I'm a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,289
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2014, 11:35:48 AM »
I used Threebond 1104 on my first rebuilts. It worked perfectly, no worms, good adherence to the crankcases, perfect sealing on no gasket surfaces, no oil leaks. When I finished the tube, I couldn't find 1104 any more. I bought Threebond 1104 NEO, not the same stuff, it doesn't adhere to the surfaces the same way, is more liquid and you have to wait too much for it to dry.
+1
1104 was replaced by 1184, IIRC.
sets up in 15 min or so....
'78 750K (F3 engine) PD42b's, Modified airbox w/K&N  filter, 40/110 jets, 1 needle shim, IMS@ 1 turn out. Kerker + Cone 18" QuietCore

Past Bikes
1974 550K0 (stock), 1973 CB350F (stock), 1983 Yamaha XS400K (POS)
77/78 cool 2 member #3
"Knowledge without mileage equals bullsh!t" - Henry Rollins

"This is my CB. There are many like it, but this one is mine…"

Offline knottedknickers

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 214
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2015, 07:52:20 AM »
I'm interested in this exact question. I intend to stay far away from any silicon / RTV-type product--I've cleaned enough of it out of my engine already... I'd also like something non-hardening.

Dino (of Hackaweek fame) swears by Permatex Aviation Form-A-Gasket. Permatex claims it's non-hardening.

Others go with Permatex Ultra Gray, but that's silicon / RTV... So is the Suzuki 1207b mentioned above.

Gasgacinch sounds deadly (see their MSDS)...

I'm a bit surprised to find that Hondabond 4 and HT are both silicon based. Can anyone confirm that? Is there a different kind of Hondabond that isn't?
CB750 K6 http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=141388.0

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data" (Borgmann 2002:5).

Offline PeWe

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,772
  • Bike almost back to the 70's 2015
Re: Hondabond differences
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2015, 11:24:17 AM »
Hondabond worked well for the cases. But it was really sticky to apply. Thinner than I thought easy to make a mess with it.
Not hondabond for gaskets when it glues the gasket very hard. I had on my valve cover gasket and have to spend 1-2 hours to remove it from the head when lifting head cover and gasket broken. I used it on one side only.

I'm curious to try Gasgacinch if it is a non hardening stuff to use on the rubber pucks under the cam tower and on the crank oil sealer behind the points plate and outgoing axis (front sprocket)
CB750 K6-76  970cc (Earlier 1005cc JMR Billet block on the shelf waiting for a comeback)
CB750 K2-75 Parts assembled to a stock K2

Updates of the CB750 K6 -1976
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180468.msg2092136.html#msg2092136
The billet block build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,49438.msg1863571.html#msg1863571
CB750 K2 -1975  build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,168243.msg1948381.html#msg1948381
K2 engine build thread. For a complete CB750 -75
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180088.msg2088008.html#msg2088008
Carb jetting, a long story Mikuni TMR32
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,179479.msg2104967.html#msg2104967