Intake 1st number, Ex 2nd
------------------------Stock Numbers
Valve Lash (Inch):
.004"
.005"
Valve Lift (Inch):----------
0.335------------------------0.315°
0.335------------------------0.295°
Valve Lift (mm):
8.51
8.51
Advertised Duration:
275°------------------------215°
275°------------------------220°
Duration @ 0.050":
242°
239°
When you degreed your cam, where was it set relative to TDC/BDC?
Analysis so far....
The stock cam began opening the intake @ 5° before B.T.D.C. The new cam has 60° more duration. How much earlier is the intake valve opening? Realize that opening the valve earlier while the piston is still on the rise, reduces the average intake draw, particularly at lower RPMS. Additionionally holding the intake open after the piston has past BDC, also reduces the draw. The cam you have chosen relies on the mass velocity at higher RPM in order to provide volumetric benefits. At low RPMs the cam profile actually hinders volumetric efficiency.
Choke doesn't really do anything until about 1/2 closed then it bogs - certainly no "improvement spike" before it bogs, if you know what I mean.
That and the burbling say it was too rich at the throttle setting where it occurs.
With the cam profile change, I'd theorize that some intake charge is being spit back into the intake manifold at low RPM, making the next draw cycle too rich. I also need to know what the throttle position is where the complaint is realized. I can't can't say more without knowing the cam/valve timing relationship with cam/lobe position. But, as it stands, you may be able to improve low end response with a cam timing change/refinement.
Could you state the current exhaust and induction set up?