@ RR,
I created a new poll to cater for your correct critique about my thread title. Please, vote, I would appreciate it.
I really didn't mean to be vexing or exasperating when I better specified my parameters and I'm sorry if I don't I don't have a clue of what I'm talking about, but that's exactly why I asked for help in this forum! RR, you're perfectly right that I have no understanding of those bikes and I'm not ashamed at all to admit it: I was not around in those times. Simple as that.
But you're wrong when you say that I don't like to be "
presented with rational relevant points, from guys that actually rode these bikes" because that's actually the very thing which I'm trying to do! It is you who don't seem to like the fact that other
"guys that actually rode these bikes" don't agree with you
. And to prove that you're wrong I even created a poll to "sterilize" the topic from my own ideas and bias which are in favour of Guzzi, Laverda & Ducati.
Don't feel that I'm scanting the GS because I'm not: I'm simply reading and learning from forum members' opinions, including yours. But so far not everyone agrees with you that the GS turned heads as much as the Honda CB750K or Laverda1000 did,in their times. But I'm happy to consider the GS when sufficient people, who know what they're talking about (and I don't, as we agreed), will concur with you that it was the
fastest AND turned heads more than its competitors, when it came out.
As for the thread title, again, you're right: it reads "iconic". And I already explained in many posts, before this one, that your understanding of "iconic" is probably closer to the dictionary while mine is childish, silly or whatever... ok, so, I made a mistake in the title. Point taken and granted.
But the reason why I posted this question was not to start a flame about which was the best bike but to get help to recreate a feeling which
absolutely must include these characteristics: "desirable", "popular" and "head turner". So Let me rectify and offer a new title, more specific to country, era, style of life, etc:
"I want help to decide which 2 or 3 bikes, not more (budget constraints), were alternative to a CB750 K and would help rekindle the feeling of a specific era, the '70s, in Italy, when riders enjoyed to race each other on the open streets and then pose outside cafés to show off their bikes. Somewhat like the British motorcycle world of cafe racers of the time, but stock."
---------------------------------------
@ wobbly,
@ascanio1
For the price of one MV Agusta America, you could almost purchase all the other bikes combined. The last time I saw one on EBay, it was priced at 24,000 Euros.
Yep... can you tell us what the sale price was, compared to a 900SS or Z1 or CB750K, in those days?
@754,
The Guzzi I speak of was out in 74 or 75 the GS Suzi was not yet a recognizeable glimmer in any dealers eye. I think to be fair here we should split this, 70-75. And 76-80...... Then it would all be in more closer perspective. Put an end to..... well 4 years later this one had 20 more hp (bit less torque), and any complaining that the Z1R TC came out, thus ending the hp race for about a good halfdecade or longer... But if he he MV Augusta is in.... then the Z1R TC. Has to be in too.
This is another important point. Thanks 754. Every new model will always appeal more than an older one but that does not make it iconic. You say that the GS could flog the 850LM (I believe you) but then, probably, the 850LM could flog the CB750K (I don't know, as we agreed I don't have a clue) but that would not make the LM850 more iconic than the CB750K. It's not enough to be faster or better. To be iconic a bike must also be appealing, desirable and turn heads.