Author Topic: What is wrong with this picture  (Read 5487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tennesseebreeze

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
  • Better to be lucky than smart.
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #25 on: January 07, 2015, 07:40:04 AM »
I'm going to do some measurements and get some better pictures tonight probably. I'm pretty sure the bolted upper part on the shock is not a modification, but just how this model was done. And as far as the wheel spacing- my instinct is that it is correct. I've eyeballed down the chain and it seems like the front and rear sprockets are in line with each other. If the bike was hit at some point and bent the frame and/or swingarm, it isn't evident in any other part of the bike. Parts can be replaced of course- but it looks like most of this bike is original. However, my suspicion is still a bent swingarm. I'll be looking at it further.
'79 CB750F, '73 CB500K2, '78 CB400A, '71 CL100

Offline Bodi

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,768
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #26 on: January 07, 2015, 08:20:03 AM »
The 400 hawk shocks attach with bolts into the frame, this is not a mod. Your picture shows the left shock with the top spring coils almost closed, the right shock looks like they are more open. That says, to me, that the right one is less compressed. The preload adjusters appear to be set the same but that isn't clear.
I still think the swingarm has been twisted. I have found, and straightened, quite a few.
If it is twisted, and you try to straighten it, you will be amazed at how easily it's bent back to "square". It can be done on the bike with a 2x4 and shocks on, two strong guys with one holding the bike and the other torqing the swingarm.
Checking for a bent frame is difficult and straightening one is not easy. Hopefully this is just the swingarm and the frame is OK.
Yes, parts can be changed. People used to, probably still do, buy several same-model wrecks and make one or two good bikes out of them with minimal "new" parts.

Offline tennesseebreeze

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
  • Better to be lucky than smart.
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #27 on: January 07, 2015, 08:40:08 AM »
Thanks Bodi- Yeah, the shocks are at the same adjustment. A twisted swingarm almost seems like the easiest to fix. If the frame is bent too then it can't be too awful- I've been riding it for over a year and despite the chain/sprocket problem, it's been a pretty solid bike with a smooth ride.
'79 CB750F, '73 CB500K2, '78 CB400A, '71 CL100

Offline Powderman

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,462
    • Creative Candy Powder Coating
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #28 on: January 11, 2015, 10:09:08 AM »
I think we can eliminate the bearing as an issue. If the bearing were gone you would be able to move the wheel around while on the center stand. It would certainly make all kinds of racket if you were riding it and cause more substantial damage in very little time.

Offline tennesseebreeze

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
  • Better to be lucky than smart.
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #29 on: January 26, 2015, 08:55:08 AM »
And the culprit was...bent swingarm!

I finally got the time to get a closer look at it. As you can see from the pictures the axle is definitely not lining up with the rest of the bike. I had to get the right pipe off to get the 2x4 in there, but I was able to bend the fork by pushing down on the lever and keeping my foot on the bike to keep it upright. In the last picture I put a straight edge on the back of the swingarm to determine if it was fixed. Bad news- pulled a muscle in my back doing it. Now I'm laid up feeling my age.
'79 CB750F, '73 CB500K2, '78 CB400A, '71 CL100

Offline fmctm1sw

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,042
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #30 on: January 26, 2015, 10:48:03 AM »
That's something else...   8)
Quote from: 754
Dude is that a tire ? or an O-ring..??

Quote from: inkscars
This is not a pod thread
This is not a #$%* on my vacuum gauges thread
This is a help or GTFO thread.

1973 CB350F
1973 CB350G
1975 CB550K
1983 GL650I
1973 CB750K3 (http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=92888.0)
1984 Kawasaki KLT-250 (AKA 3 wheeler of death)
1994 Honda TRX300
1999 Honda TRX250

Offline martin99

  • UK Based, Non-
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,730
  • Adventure before Dementia
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #31 on: January 26, 2015, 11:57:05 AM »
Well done for getting it sorted, and well done for the update. Too often we see people with problems on here and don't get to know the outcome. Good on ya.

Take care of that back, mine's still farked two years on.
 :)
Build threads:
77 750F2 Refresh Project http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=144075.0
TRIBSA http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,160296.0.html

1977 CB750 F2
1958 Norton Model 99
2011 Triumph Street Triple 675

Offline tennesseebreeze

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
  • Better to be lucky than smart.
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #32 on: January 26, 2015, 12:41:21 PM »
Well done for getting it sorted, and well done for the update. Too often we see people with problems on here and don't get to know the outcome. Good on ya.

Take care of that back, mine's still farked two years on.
 :)

Thanks. I'd like to think it could help someone with the same problem. It was an odd problem to track down because the bike seemed to ride fine. The back should be okay in a day or two. I can get around- just sore as hell.
'79 CB750F, '73 CB500K2, '78 CB400A, '71 CL100

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,810
  • bike in a box
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #33 on: January 26, 2015, 02:09:32 PM »
just take a straight vooden plank..and hold it on the side of the rear hveel..and see if it are parelel to the front hveel..evt use a par schrevs to press it in to the hveel so it are teight
 

A long florescent tube is a good straight object to gauge whether your wheel are parallel, but fragile.

I have helped with frame straightening before, it involved bolting the whole naked frame to a machine table and using a cheater bar to pull the head tube perpendicular to the swing arm bolt or vice versa. It's not that involved after you pull everything off the frame. :P
« Last Edit: January 26, 2015, 02:14:53 PM by faux fiddy »
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline tennesseebreeze

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
  • Better to be lucky than smart.
Re: What is wrong with this picture
« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2015, 06:12:28 AM »
just take a straight vooden plank..and hold it on the side of the rear hveel..and see if it are parelel to the front hveel..evt use a par schrevs to press it in to the hveel so it are teight
 

A long florescent tube is a good straight object to gauge whether your wheel are parallel, but fragile.

I have helped with frame straightening before, it involved bolting the whole naked frame to a machine table and using a cheater bar to pull the head tube perpendicular to the swing arm bolt or vice versa. It's not that involved after you pull everything off the frame. :P

I hope I don't have the pleasure of having to do that, but it is good to know.  ;)
'79 CB750F, '73 CB500K2, '78 CB400A, '71 CL100