Looks great, Jag. Never ridden a Norton although I would like to buy one.
Can you describe the difference in handling compared to a CB750?
That's a great question Stev-o. Hope Jag doesn't mind if I chip in.
Frame geometry on the Commando is a widely debated topic on the NOC site, with a lot of evidence that they were not symmetrical from the factory, particularly those out-sorced for manufacture in Europe (Italy I think). Biggest clue seems to be wheel alignment, in particular the back wheel not being central to the frame when aligned with the front. There are guys that specialise in 'putting that right' over here, with claims of improved handling as a result. There are various other mods aimed at reducing weave and vibration, from head steadys to upgraded isolastic engine mounts.
Personally, I think if you ride an old Brit it's better to just get aquainted with its quirks and ride accordingly. Commandos to CB750's isn't apples and oranges, but they are different enough to make it difficult to do a real comparison. My old Commando (750 Roadster) was lighter, more 'flickable' than a CB, making it a great ride through the twisties. It did suffer from weave if entering a sweeping bend a bit too spirited, but you soon got to know the limitations. Didn't have the acceleration of the CB, and the vibration made for an unpleasant ride for prolonged, sustained speeds. In those days, there wasn't any discussion about frame geometry, balancing cranks etc or if there was I didn't know about it.
My featherbed Dommie, now 58 yrs old, inspires more confidence handling wise than the Commando ever did, and, at the risk of sounding sacrilegious, is my bike of choice over my CB for a 'fun' ride all day long. Just have to treat it with a bit of respect.
