Author Topic: Design feature you dislike the most  (Read 1745 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline eigenvector

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,949
  • Member of the despondent public
Design feature you dislike the most
« on: June 04, 2017, 02:45:45 PM »
Overall I really like these bikes.  Just so that we're clear on that point.  Generally speaking of all the bikes I've owned/own my little CB550K is still my favorite.  No it doesn't have much power, but it fits me like a glove and now that I have my 4-4 exhaust it sounds MUCH better than that old tinny EMGO I had on there.

That said...

Of all the things I could go on about - there are 2 things I just can't defend
1)  The fuel inlet valves on the carbs.  Uhhgg, those freakin' things jam at the drop of a hat.  Doesn't matter how well you maintain them - all it takes is the wrong motion and one of them will jam in the inlet port either overflowing the carb or blocking off fuel flow.  Of all the bikes I've owned over the hundred of thousands of miles I've ridden -  this is the only one that does that.

2)  The headlight bucket.  What sadist thought that a normal human could jam all those wires in there and not either create bad grounds, bent connectors, and/or bad circuits.

Originally I was also going to toss in the airbox/carb rack - until I realized that every bike is like that.  None of the bikes I've worked on had anything other than a terrible airbox design with respect to removing the carb rack.  If anything the CB is better - try your hand at removing the Nighthawk's carb rack, or adjusting the Sabre's throttle cables without destroying your knuckles.  On a Tiger 1050 you basically have to take half the bike apart just to see the airbox - and there are over a dozen screws to remove to see the intake manifold underneath it.
Rob
--------------------------------
2018 HD Softail Heritage
1979 CB750K Limited Edition
1977 CB550K
1984 CB700SC Nighthawk
1983 VF750S Sabre

Offline 754

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,058
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2017, 03:05:48 PM »
Clean your tank..we would go years and years without having carb sticking problems.
 The head light has stuff in it but here is the good part.. It all makes sense.
 But you got to be able to see. .had a buddy had some trouble not seeing it was a 4 wire connector, it looked like a 3 wire..
 Once you try running a smaller light, you gonna have a big wiring lump to hide.

Design flaw. Suzuki. GS sidecovers at rear have a semicircle hanging over the diagonal frame tube...sucks goatballs...IMO...
Maker of the WELDLESS 750 Frame Kit
dodogas99@gmail.com
Kelowna B.C.       Canada

My next bike will be a ..ANFOB.....

It's All part of the ADVENTURE...

73 836cc.. Green, had it for 3 decades!!
Lost quite a few CB 750's along the way

Offline Jnel

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 296
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2017, 03:20:50 PM »
"...sucks goatballs...IMO..."

Im going to keep that one. 754

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk


Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2017, 03:32:32 PM »
I thought putting the rear turn sigs under the passengers rump was not so good an idea.  You can't put saddlebags on that nice long seat without relocating the sigs.  They did correct that with the 77-78 k models.
The worst design though, was not using gas tight or gas impervious electrical connectors.  This guaranteed eventual electrical issues due to corroded connectors.  Fuse box wasn't very robust either and used soon to be obsolete fuse sizes.  Also improved with later models.

Second to worst was the floating shafts in the early 500-550 rocker covers.  Allowing soft aluminum as a bearing surface against steel was a downright design error.

Third worst was probably mufflers that rusted out rapidly.

A peev is no primary chain tensioner for the 500-550 and the trans clatter that results.
Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline eigenvector

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,949
  • Member of the despondent public
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2017, 04:21:59 PM »
On those electrical connectors..

I originally had the same issue - I personally can't stand those style connectors as they generally fall apart over time and if you want to separate them more often than not you crack or destroy something in the process.
I thought I was going to be so innovative and replace mine with water tight connectors - Deutsch I think they're called.   :-[  Oh they're definitely water tight, absolutely snug, durable as all get out - and about 5 times larger than the originals, and 10 times more expensive.

They haven't improved much on the original design - just made them smaller.
Rob
--------------------------------
2018 HD Softail Heritage
1979 CB750K Limited Edition
1977 CB550K
1984 CB700SC Nighthawk
1983 VF750S Sabre

Offline carnivorous chicken

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,871
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2017, 04:46:13 PM »
750 -- engine and frame clearance (mediated by kits of course, but still a doozy).

350/400 airboxes.

Offline pjlogue

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 982
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2017, 04:53:32 PM »
750 -- engine and frame clearance (mediated by kits of course, but still a doozy).

I agree, that's at the top of the list.

-P.

Offline jonda500

  • I may be crazy but I'm not stupid!
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,804
  • With our thoughts we make the world (Monkey Magic)
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2017, 04:57:03 PM »
The way the 'HONDA' plate haphazardly clips rather insecurely to the alternator cover on 500's and early 550's.
John
Remember that an ignoramus is only someone who doesn't know something you just learned yesterday!

A starter clutch thread:
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,122084.0.html
1972 CB500K1 original 4 owner bike
1972 CB500K1 returned to complete/original condition
1975 CB550F built from parts - project thread:
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,149161.msg1711626.html#msg1711626
197? CB500/550 constructing from left over parts
1998 KTM 380 (two stroke) recent impulse buy, mmmm...

Offline halllzy

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2017, 05:13:23 PM »
750 -- engine and frame clearance (mediated by kits of course, but still a doozy).

350/400 airboxes.
+💯

If you think of what people thought "the future" would bring back in the 70's when the bikes were released nothing short of teleporting new valve seals in to place solves engine removal req'd to get at the top end for the 750's



Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk


Offline BomberMann650

  • Holy Cow! I'm a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,431
  • Dr. Bovinestein iBa#80333
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2017, 09:50:06 PM »
Worn out Primary Chains  >:(

Offline Deltarider

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,132
  • ... but some animals are more equal than others.
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2017, 11:30:27 PM »
Quote
Worn out primary Chains  >:(
The primary chain is not my concern. As a matter of fact I'm on my way proving how long it can last (now: 135.000 kms). Haven't seen or heard of an oil gally that was actually cut open by it. The morse chain itself is oversized and well capable of handling much more HP than the 50hp the CB550 delivers. No, my concern is the camchain tensioner. It's by far the weakest point in the engine design (mind you, back then this was the case for almost every motorcycle). Ón mine the tensioner was replaced at around 45.000 km and at around 80.000 km and if I'm not mistaken I can now order number 3. The CB500/550 bottom end is practically undestructible.
Carbs: the less you touch them, the better. Cleaning is OK and sometimes inevitable but tampering with floattangs and raising/lowering of jetneedles - I know that manuals like Clymer are happy to fill pages with it - but I'd stay away from it. Bear in mind that we all, looking at these impressive exploded views, sooner or later, fall victim to some degree of delusion of reference. For an experiment I raised my needles but I think of returning them to the 3rd and middle position, maybe with a thin shim. If your floatlevel is not as it should, try to elimenate other causes like non original fuellines, sticky floatneedles and obstructed vents. A sticky floatneedle is hard to detect by the clear tube method, but you will notice it when you check the floatlevels the way Honda described. Adjusting the tangs IMO is only needed if the PO was a reader of this forum.
Use genuine Honda parts and your Honda will remain to be a true Honda, a very reliable and tough bike.
All in all I liked the first CB550K (small blinkers and taillight) best. Only change the handlebar for the euro version and it's a perfect allrounder. However, I don't know if that first model had the improved swingarm bearings yet. K3 and F2 I dislike most. Good things were changed (wiring inside the handlebars, frontfork protectors abandoned) for inferior (PD carbs, horrible oversized blinkers and taillights) and all them tubes all over the bike (K3-4), yecch!
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 02:31:05 AM by Deltarider »
CB500K2-ED Excel black
"There is enough for everyone's need but not enough for anybody's greed."

Online PeWe

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,597
  • Bike almost back to the 70's 2015
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2017, 02:51:40 AM »
CB750:
- It would be nice if cam and pimary chains can be replaced without tearing the entire engine apart. At least the rubber tensioners that transform to bakelite and fall into pieces.
-Not possible to lift valve cover without pulling the entire engine. Lift head and cylinder too a good thing. Frame must be modified for this and affect the value for a restorer to OEM look.
- Wrong fuse for rear stop light that blow 15A main fuse if shorted. Bike will stop direct, no light at all. Safety issue when riding on a dark road. It should be fused by the rear light 5A fuse.
- Bad wire routing design of the cabling from handle bar switches. Inside the handle bar that made many to grind openings in the switch housings in a bad way causing short circuits when changing handle bar or only tilting the handle bar that need other angles of the switches. It should have been an outside design from the very beginning.
- Front brake a joke! At least a better disc with stopping grip.
- Rear shocks should have been better.
- Swing arm bearings! Why plastic instead of at least bronze bushings? Needle bearings or tapered roller bearings as alternative.
- Steering head bearing bicycle style, not for a bike enter higher speeds. Tapered roller bearings should been there from the beginning!
- Steering damper missing. Other even older bikes had a steering damper going thru the tripple and possible to adjust the friction.

- Why power down the CB750 while Kawasaki Z1-900 entered the market and continued to do so?
The first CB750 with slightly hotter cam, manually adjusted ports in head, ign setting and open Lotus Rooot 4-4 exhaust should have been kept together with higher CR + more displacement + bigger valves and outpowered the Z1-900! Rods can handle 80rwhp.

CB750F2 came too late and they blew the winning design of the K0-K6 bikes. It must have been desgined to keep up with the Z1-900 that had way better look. It should have had 90hp (on crank) that a hotter cam and maybe better port job should have given it. Honda should have worked together with RC engineering and Action Fours to power up.

I know... the design of the 80's entered the scene and plenty of horrible designs overflowed us... typical 80 design is not anything beautiful or even tough, just bulky, square sized and ugly. Kawasaki gave up the beautiful Z1900/1000 for the real ugly beast Kawasaki 1300.
CB900 DOHC was known to be way too weak direct when it was introduced. Pathetic model, badwill for Honda. That crap embarrassed me as a proud Honda owner. They had at least CBX1000 to save the image.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 03:20:49 AM by PeWe »
CB750 K6-76  970cc (Earlier 1005cc JMR Billet block on the shelf waiting for a comeback)
CB750 K2-75 Parts assembled to a stock K2

Updates of the CB750 K6 -1976
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180468.msg2092136.html#msg2092136
The billet block build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,49438.msg1863571.html#msg1863571
CB750 K2 -1975  build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,168243.msg1948381.html#msg1948381
K2 engine build thread. For a complete CB750 -75
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180088.msg2088008.html#msg2088008
Carb jetting, a long story Mikuni TMR32
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,179479.msg2104967.html#msg2104967

Offline ekpent

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,512
  • To many bikes-but lookin' for more
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2017, 03:59:15 AM »
 The Cb750 kind of got caught up in a time when like cars of that period were being detuned to try and get better gas mileage during the oil embargo years. Anybody have a Vega or Pinto  ::)  They also tried to change the engine characteristics to a more low end torque configuration because of the huge amount of people who were fitting Vetter fairings,bags,crash bars etc. and making them into kind of a first generation open road tour er. Though the Goldwing was kind of a naked hot rod when first introduced Honda realized the massive potential of a dedicated touring model and we all know how that morphed.  Overall they stuck with that SOHC design for a little too long.

Online PeWe

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,597
  • Bike almost back to the 70's 2015
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2017, 04:22:06 AM »
  Overall they stuck with that SOHC design for a little too long.
We all on this forum are stucked with the SOHC and still loving it, right?  ;)  ;D There are even guys with several SOHC bikes in their garages!  8)
A bike with 80-100 rwhp is enough for fun and touring! City bike only, even less hp needed, maybe half...
CB750 K6-76  970cc (Earlier 1005cc JMR Billet block on the shelf waiting for a comeback)
CB750 K2-75 Parts assembled to a stock K2

Updates of the CB750 K6 -1976
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180468.msg2092136.html#msg2092136
The billet block build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,49438.msg1863571.html#msg1863571
CB750 K2 -1975  build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,168243.msg1948381.html#msg1948381
K2 engine build thread. For a complete CB750 -75
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180088.msg2088008.html#msg2088008
Carb jetting, a long story Mikuni TMR32
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,179479.msg2104967.html#msg2104967

Offline flybox1

  • My wife thinks I'm a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,301
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2017, 09:23:21 AM »
350->550 air boxes.  whatapain!
If they made them separate in halves and simpler to install/remove... like the 750s, i'm sure fewer would have switched to pods.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 10:12:37 AM by flybox1 »
'78 750K (F3 engine) PD42b's, Modified airbox w/K&N  filter, 40/110 jets, 1 needle shim, IMS@ 1 turn out. Kerker + Cone 18" QuietCore

Past Bikes
1974 550K0 (stock), 1973 CB350F (stock), 1983 Yamaha XS400K (POS)
77/78 cool 2 member #3
"Knowledge without mileage equals bullsh!t" - Henry Rollins

"This is my CB. There are many like it, but this one is mine…"

Offline carnivorous chicken

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,871
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2017, 09:48:34 AM »
If they made men separate in halves and simpler to install/remove... l

I think many women feel the same way!

Offline flybox1

  • My wife thinks I'm a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,301
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #16 on: June 05, 2017, 10:13:02 AM »
Oh geez...corrected  ::)

..but that was funny  ;D
'78 750K (F3 engine) PD42b's, Modified airbox w/K&N  filter, 40/110 jets, 1 needle shim, IMS@ 1 turn out. Kerker + Cone 18" QuietCore

Past Bikes
1974 550K0 (stock), 1973 CB350F (stock), 1983 Yamaha XS400K (POS)
77/78 cool 2 member #3
"Knowledge without mileage equals bullsh!t" - Henry Rollins

"This is my CB. There are many like it, but this one is mine…"

Offline BPellerine

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,222
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #17 on: June 05, 2017, 10:52:44 AM »
top end oiling system,all those small passages,easily blocked,all to reduce external lines,and streamline the look,complete teardown to fix.bill
1978 CB 750K ard and webers
another anfob

Offline NobleHops

  • Don ya be callin' me no
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,345
  • Misfit - Tucson, Arizona
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #18 on: June 05, 2017, 06:41:15 PM »
As I read this thread it gets me thinking that we should all go get some Kawasakis!

;-)

Nils Menten * Tucson, Arizona, USA

I have a motorcycle problem.

My build thread: NobleHops makes a 400F pretty for his wife: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=131210.0

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #19 on: June 05, 2017, 06:44:07 PM »
As I read this thread it gets me thinking that we should all go get some Kawasakis!

;-)
Does Kawasaki provide parts for their vintage bikes?
Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline NobleHops

  • Don ya be callin' me no
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,345
  • Misfit - Tucson, Arizona
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #20 on: June 05, 2017, 08:19:37 PM »
I did not have any problem finding parts for my Z1 project, but that bike in particular is extremely well supported by the aftermarket.

N.
Nils Menten * Tucson, Arizona, USA

I have a motorcycle problem.

My build thread: NobleHops makes a 400F pretty for his wife: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=131210.0

Offline Stev-o

  • Ain't no
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 34,356
  • Central Texas
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2017, 07:21:37 AM »


....we should all go get some Kawasakis!


Done!
'74 "Big Bang" Honda 750K [836].....'76 Honda 550F.....K3 Park Racer!......and a Bomber!............plus plus plus.........

Online PeWe

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,597
  • Bike almost back to the 70's 2015
Re: Design feature you dislike the most
« Reply #22 on: June 06, 2017, 07:57:21 AM »
As I read this thread it gets me thinking that we should all go get some Kawasakis!

;-)


I tested a Kawasaki 1000R -1983 sometimes back in 83-85, engine ran very hard, not as smooth like my CB750 (836+ cam+ported head). Painful to have the feet on foot pegs around 120-130kmh on 5:th gear. Vibrations!

A friend followed me to Italy (Rimini) via Austria (Zell Am See) back on my bike, a tour of 2500+2500km or slightly more. He had followed another guy before on his Kawasaki 1000R on similar trip(s). My Honda was much more comfortable.
CB750 K6-76  970cc (Earlier 1005cc JMR Billet block on the shelf waiting for a comeback)
CB750 K2-75 Parts assembled to a stock K2

Updates of the CB750 K6 -1976
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180468.msg2092136.html#msg2092136
The billet block build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,49438.msg1863571.html#msg1863571
CB750 K2 -1975  build thread
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,168243.msg1948381.html#msg1948381
K2 engine build thread. For a complete CB750 -75
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,180088.msg2088008.html#msg2088008
Carb jetting, a long story Mikuni TMR32
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,179479.msg2104967.html#msg2104967