Sigop, they were worn out and needed replacement in maybe 15k miles at the most. Often the shock seals inside are not working and they have very little resistance and it is the springs that are providing any cushioning. Springs were an early form of cushioning a ride before hydraulic shocks were developed.
In '78 Honda was using a brand called FVQ. Standing joke was that stood for Fades Very Quickly. Inexpensive shocks never last very long, even today, but the technology and materials have advanced well beyond what it was in the 70s and even the 80s. Some brands were built with longevity and quality in mind and used some if not the best material available and others, just like today, are merely disposables when used up.
So, keep them if you want, but anyone who wants their bike to handle well today should be looking to replace their shocks if they find them still on the bike and they want something they can ride and enjoy.
If I went solely on spring strength my police interceptor would probably never fail the bounce test as it is hard to deflect the body down much on any corner to get an accurate read. I know the shocks are past their useful life and are being replaced next week.
Once uncoupled from the springs in the suspension I expect them to be pretty easy to move in and out of the shock body. I know I have put it off too long. The rear shocks are a real pain to replace, so much so many will cut a hole in the trunk to be able to reach the top nut of the shock, rather than very slowly removing the top shock nut, it is a real pain