There is 10kΩ and there is... 10kΩ. It is possible that Honda fitted 10kΩ plugcaps on some models, although personally I have serious doubts.
Ooooh, your doubt causes me indescribable pain. But, I invite you to come and measure my collection of 550s. They all have 10 K plug caps. 90% are still originals from Honda. (They don't have the NGK impression on them, the replacements do, though).
From what I've seen,... I discovered that I had one (only one) plugcap that read around 10kΩ.
Having no documentation on it, for me it was impossible to find out if that one was a genuine 10kΩ Honda plugcap...
Thanks for that inconclusive, anecdotal, unusefull report. I'm sure we can all file it away where it belongs.
Now what I'm against is the advice I've read several times in this forum: to have both the 5kΩ resistor plug and the 5kΩ resistor cap to mimick a presumed 'original' 10kΩ resistor plug.
Great. Pick an opinion without facts or reason. Regardless, follow me! Nice.
Wait a minute! Who says it was original 10kΩ?
That's what the Honda part reference number got me when I replaced a broken cap 20 years ago. Had to order it, as the ones he had in stock were all for bikes that had D8EA heat range plugs. The replacements measured...wait for it... 10 K ohms, just like the other three on the bike.
As far as I know, we-do-not-know. That's one and two: what is advised here, does not result in the same as having that presumed original 10kΩ resistor plugcap. Why? Well, because instead of two transition ends, you'll have four and that is a serious factor in reliability.
Oh really? Care to quantify that "serious" factor? Are you saying the MTBF calculation says failure is imminent in 1000 years rather than 2000 years?
That's why I don't like that idea at all. Then this: as far as I know there are NO complaints by riders that stay on the safe side and run 5kΩ resistance.
So, your questionair canvas of no people led you to a conclusion there is no issue? That's junk science fiction at its most fictional. Here's another; I've also noted the lack of complaints when I fart in public. Therefore, I submit my farts don't stink to anyone but me.
Do you even read the rubbish you post?
It was and is generally advised by official Honda dealers. The longer spark duration with a 10kΩ resistor plug is hypothetical and that's as far as I can go, not having seen any evidence.
You haven't looked or have the where-with-all to prove or disprove, either. You only have keyboard access to make unsupported assertions, with repeat capability.
... What I know for a fact - and I think we all can agree on this - is that a 10kΩ resistor transforms more energy in heat than a 5kΩ.
In theory, that's true. As far as that goes. But, is a quantification of one Joule of energy really of concern out of the total joules sourced from the coil?
But there is consolation for us all: a standard healthy ignition with 5kΩ resistor plugcaps offers a burning time at the electrodes during plenty degrees crank rotation. So why risk it? For what?
Another red herring argument. For one, the spark duration is only a portion of the power stroke in either the lower or higher resistance cases. Neither lasts the entire power stroke. But, longer is better for a more complete burn.
But, risk? There is no risk to keeping the design parameters of the original product. The way I see it, you are asking others to take a risk of a design change based on no practical data. For the 550, I expect the risk is losing spark plug effective life when increasing the secondary loop current, as well is a small impact on fuel mileage.
What is your fuel mileage? Don't you think a longer duration spark could improve that?
I challenge folks that insist it was original 10kΩ to order a genuine CB500/550 plugcap at CMSNL and inform us what resistance it reads. Depending on which one you choose, it will only set you back € 21,- or € 26,50 a piece. A bargain to end uncertainty, if you ask me.
Again someone else to do the research for you AND pay for your "education". Such a master manipulator!
But, how do you know that CSML didn't change their stocking procedure based on part availability from the manufacturing source based on an accountants desire to have product to sell with the best profit margin?
As a design engineer, I've had the part procurement department change vendors due to either availability or parts cost. Never mind that the operational specs for the part number were actually different, and could not be guaranteed to work in the design. Which was why we had to qualify all the parts and vendors we specified.
Are we having fun yet?