I am curious as to why the UNI foam filter is considered inferior. I have read about another forum member getting better Dyno results when switching from foam back to paper. I believe the thinking was that the paper element flowed more air. I thought the foam elements were supposed to flow MORE air (unless they are over oiled). I am probably begging for endless speculation here, anyone have good info on this?
i while ago i tested a uni filter against an OEM paper filter on the dyno. that was with a built-up engine with optimised head flow. with that, i got better results, i.e. more air and higher hp numbers at high rpms, with the paper filter.
however, the engine design needs to be able to support this and i believe with a stock engine the difference will be tiny, i.e. the uni should be able to support the required flow, at least up to reasonable rpms. but paper filters are easy to find and quick and cheap to replace so why bother...
in my engine, i am now using the original paper filter still, and replace it every 10k km. after that it also reduces flow which can also be measured. again, that's with my high flowing engine - with an original one longer replacement intervals may be fine.
what may flow as well or better than the paper filter, and not need replacement is a single k&n pod on the original plenum which is what i want to try next.