... I think the problem with the digital tachs is that they’re so accurate all you see is a blur of numbers. Like I posted above, a sweeping needle is so much easier to grasp. The digital tachometer is one of the worst inventions ever.
Actually there are a lot of measurements that are much easier to read analogue: Volts, Dwell, RPM, % CO to mention a few. That Actron looks like a suitable meter. Usually even the cheap ones are accurate. If equipped with a d'Arsonval meter, so much the better. Meters for the DIY market are cheap because of the inferior quality cables and plastic casing that is far from rugged.
I do not know much about electronics, but I wonder If you could create a 'true' RPM reading without having to multiply what you see displayed by 2 and so have finer increments. Could it be done by connecting the pulse probe via a splice to both points with a diode fitted in each (sub)lead? I suppose it could work with a duty dycle less than 50%, but probably not with the 51,1-54,4% prescribed for our ignitions. Any of you have a suggestion?
From experience I cannot recommend the RPM method for the CB500/550. These models need a relative rich idle to compensate the lack of acceleration jets and so facilitate an acceptable driveability. I've tried and found it very, very time consuming. I'd rather use a CO meter.