Two Tired -
It hadn't occurred to me that the tubes could be bent since one of my original tubes was obviously bent and did not bind in this way. Still, your theory seems plausible.
kghost -
I trusted the seller when he said they were filled with oil. Once they collapsed, I started to wonder. But, when I pulled the springs, they were dripping with the stuff. That, of course, doesn't rule out old gunk at the bottom.
bryanj -
The alloy certainly appears to be in good shape on the outside. Do you think there could be internal damage that might do this?
Unlce Ernie -
As for buying used forks, my whole bike is used, so I'm not really worried about it. Admittedly, though, it's starting to make sense why these forks were so cheap.
So, it looks like the next step is to drain, disassemble and examine. So here's my follow-up question:
If one of these "new" forks is bent, or otherwise damaged, theoretically, I could cannibalize my straight orginal fork for parts. However, the two sets of forks are not exactly the same. Overall, they are the same length and have identical caliper/fender mounts. However, the alloy lowers on the "new" set are noticeably longer than the originals -- maybe an inch longer. I don't know what year the "new" ones came from. They were simply listed as CB500/550 forks. Does anybody know what the difference in lower housing length signifies? Does it mean the internals are incompatible? What about the tubes?