this type of discussion can go on for pages. Look at audiokarma, as an example, and pull up vinyl vs cd. It is educational but heated.
The cd is digital..1's and 0's....which allegedly makes the music waveform a series of "steps" not the uniform continuous soundwave it is, which cuts the signal off........Ok, I' ll buy that.
On the other hand, I learned that making records back in the day required that the live music signal had to be "compromised " because of the limits of the playback equipment at the time. I guess primarily the needle/cartridge/ turntables capability to track the groove.
I'm a vinyl guy.
But if I play the same album , vinyl and cd, at the same time and switch back and forth....I gotta say the cd seems to come out ahead. but the cd is louder so I have to turn it down, ...and my hearing is definitely not close to a 20 year old....and my turntable equipment is late 70's pioneer , and my speakers ,well, I don't know how good they compare....so my stuff is not top of the line......so, it's subjective,
My cd's are older..AAD, Which is supposedly the best way to make a cd.
Generally speaking my older albums, even if I played some a lot, can sound better when compared to a newer vinyl pressing of the same album.....it can depend on who's doing the remix, is it a pristine master tape, and the cutting and pressing......
another page after page of discussions and discourse......
I prefer vinyl....