Newday, you're right. I always make the mistake to assume everyone's bike here, is or has been a daily runner. Mine isn't btw, but it runs regularly enough to stay healthy. Nine out of ten issues I may have had, had to do with... standing and not with riding. Just the other day I've sent a copy of that 1994 article to friends. Its an interview with an owner who had bought his CB500 new in 1974, never did any maintenance himself, but had it done by his dealer and thanks to using his bike as a daily rider, had, the day when he was interviewed 220.000km on the odometer and the engine had not been 'opened' yet for anything but adjusting the valves. Mind you, he was not the only one in those years who easily covered over 100.000 miles without needing an overhaul. That's how utterly robust these engines were. The AA man, who was in the garage some years ago to assist my neighbour with his @#$!@ Smart, knew from daily practice how sturdy Honda engines in general are. He mentioned 'Honda Joe' an American who has made the press when his Accord had clocked 1.000.000 miles, that's 1.600.000km!
Looking at the issues I see so often coming by in this forum, I sometimes cannot believe it's about the same bike I have.
Without question, when carbs have been left unattended, you can expect a mess inside and they will need to be cleaned. Guess what, I've 'cleaned' my carbs when I had opened them out of curiosity... but, did they needed it? Mwah, hardly. It seems mine were kept clean by the passing gasoline. Yes, a few O-rings, especially those tiny ones around the main jets needed replacement, but that's it. All the brassware is still the same Keihin put in there, in 1975.
But, again, it's good you pointed me at this. I'll try to remember it. What really worries me though, is that he, who can sum up the most ''shortcomings", is automatically regarded here as an expert. But hey, that does not reflect reality. In my archives I have several rider reports to prove it. Two of these riders reports are about the CB500 and in the last one, respondents had distanced a combined total of 40 times around the world. Has also to do with that - in contrast of the US where a bike usually was an extra - lots of folks here had a motorcycle instead of a car.
What I also see here is - I suspect - cognitive dissonance.
The fact that a manual describes any possible repair, does not automatically imply you have to do all this. Most of what is in these pages, has been copy pasted from other manuals anyway. It's hardly ever commented on by mechanics that have serviced these bikes. Haynes comments occasionally.
My best source has always been the mechanics in the workshops. I had made it my strategy to, whenever I needed something like a filter or sparksplugs, I would visit the dealer, when they were sat having lunch. Then they had time to answer a question I had, or assure me. that something which maybe was a frequent issue with other bikes, they had never seen occur on my model. In those years they were not trying - again in contrast with the US - to sell you things, the thing they wanted above all, was to invest in a good relationship with you. A confession: when I had opened my topend myself (at around 80.000) to save costs and from there have the judgement and reassembly done by a professional mec in a Honda workshop, the first thing he asked me was, why I had opened it up. Red in my face I stumbled that I thought it was about time. He smiled whilst nodding his head. He had seen many that had done twice the distance.
The mere fact that there are Keyster carb sets in the market, does not automatically imply the same parts on yours wear fast. It's a conclusion some simply draw, because of the mere existence of these sets in the market. And ofcourse, they can't wait to do 'maintenance'. Ofcourse, anything better than having to assist in the household, right? Here again: very well cognitive dissonance is at play here. Therefore I cannot repeat enough: this forum is about our bikes and it is about us. Sorry for this lengthy answer.