Author Topic: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions  (Read 520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« on: January 21, 2025, 05:50:02 PM »
Hi All,

I'm currently rebuilding my CB 750 K8, I've buttoned up the bottom and and am working my way up. I have a few questions about the top end, specifically with the cylinders and valve guides.

Cylinder number two has a scratch that goes roughly 2/3's of the way up the cylinder wall (see attached pictures). You can just barely catch the scratch with your fingernail. I need to remeasure the cylinders but it might be possible to hone it a little more to remove it.  The machine shop I spoke with has built 750 motors in the past and said if it was going in their bike they wouldn't worry about it due to the location of it. I've had a bad feeling about it and figured I'd see what the experts think  ;).

The other issue with the cylinder is that the sleeves are sitting ever so slightly above the deck, this was probably my fault and happened when heating in the oven after painting. I was able to heat the head up and get the sleeves close to flush but when checking for flatness there are some sections that i can fit a .005" feeler gauge under a straight edge. I can probably use a hydraulic press but I'm not confident I won't damage or mar up the mating surfaces, should I just get it decked?

For the valve guides, I had the exhaust guides replaced by a local shop a while back and made the mistake of not inspecting them until now while I am in the process of reassembly. Honestly it looks like he did a really rough job honing/reaming to match the valves. (Hopefully) You can see in the pictures but it looks like there are steps inside the valve guide from whatever bit he used or if his setup wasn't aligned properly. I'm assuming this is going to cut into and damage my new valves? Luckily, I do have 4 more that i had originally gotten to replace the intakes. Is it worth trying to hone these/ clean up the current guides myself or do i just need to replace them and try again?

I'm in Durham NC, if anyone has suggestions for local shops to use i'd greatly appreciate it. I'm on a budget and not sure about shipping these out of state for work.

Sorry for the wall of text and thanks for any advice yall have, this forum has been a huge help throughout this build and i'm hoping it'll come through with this as well!

« Last Edit: January 21, 2025, 05:52:13 PM by jmelton »

Offline denward17

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,463
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2025, 07:59:00 PM »
I can't help with your head/cylinder questions; I sent my head to JMR porting service (MRieck) and he rebuilt my '78 head with all new guides/valves springs, decking and a minor port job.  It came back immaculate, and runs great.

I took my cylinders (I live near Raleigh) to Walker Machine Shop, 705 E Six Forks Rd, Raleigh, and they did a great job with boring/honing and got the clearances I requested.  Also did a 550 and used the same machine shop for the cylinders as well.

I don't think I would put it back together with that groove in the cylinder, especially if I was planning to keep the bike.

There will be some more experienced replies shortly....

Would love to see your bike in the spring.....

My build thread is in my signature...

Offline scottly

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,399
  • Humboldt, AZ
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2025, 08:15:04 PM »
I wouldn't worry about the scratch in the bore, as it's below the travel of the compression ring. I do not recommend trying to hone it out.
The sleeves need to be fully seated in the cylinder block. If you deck the surface, the sleeves may drop down in service and cause headaches down the road. Try using more heat instead of resorting to brute force.
Did the shop cut the valve seats after replacing the guides? How well do the valves fit into the guides? With the valve 1/4" or so off the seat, how much wiggle is there at the end of the stem? The bronze guides are softer than the valve stems, so shouldn't damage them.
Don't fix it if it ain't broke!
Helmets save brains. Always wear one and ride like everyone is trying to kill you....

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2025, 02:33:58 AM »
1) Did the machine shop measure the taper of the cylinders.?
Especially the cylinder they said “if it were going in their bike they wouldn’t worry about
about it..”

If not I’d have the “taper and bore” size accurately determined before
deciding whether to use a damaged cylinder.

2)  Was the cylinders head guide work performed by the same machine shop that told you
if it was their’s they’d wouldn’t worry about it.?

Your worries already indicate your not satisfied with the work or advise that the
machine shop(s) gave you. Follow your intuitions and follow up and measure what
you have to make an informed decision. If the measurements exceed what Honda
recommended the decision will be made for and you know what your success rate will be.

From the arm chair, I’ve never had a machine shops prepare bronze valve guides that
looks like those even in cast iron heads. If the picture of the inside and the top of the
guide is indicative of their work, I’d say your worries are valid.

The stroke is 63mm. You can measure down to see If the scratch is indeed below the ring set’s
actual travel or not.. the entire ring set work as a complimenting set. The oil ring is important
too, for the obvious oil control reasons..what it doesn’t do the second ring will have to do also..

Measure and measure again, it way more economical than another set of gaskets, seals, etc..
especially when dealing with budget constraints..

Keep at it..




Age Quod Agis

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2025, 02:50:08 AM »
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=196280.0;fs=82852;attach=507300;image

Is the spot below the scratch in the picture showing less cross hatching than the adjacent areas above, below, and side to side.? 

Did you hone the cylinders or did the machine shop.?
Was it a real hone, glaze buster, or dingle berry?
Age Quod Agis

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2025, 05:02:46 AM »
The machine shop i originally took the cylinders to was the Walker Machine Shop, and the reason they weren't concerned about the scratch was due to it ending below the travel of the compression ring. But when measured the scratch comes about 32mm from the top of the cylinders, which seems like it would be a potential issue? The cylinders measured on the tighter side of the spec prior to honing. The shop did a real hone and the cross hatching goes the full length of the bore, the shadow just hides it. The shop confirmed they were still in spec when i picked them up but I'll re-measure them later today to confirm.

I originally used heat with some flat ground aluminum from work when trying to re-seat the cylinder sleeves but was only able to get them close to flush resulting in a few areas that  are .005" proud. Maybe a shop would have better luck with this? Or should i try bolting the head and cylinders together and stick those in the oven to try and get things flat?

The valve guides were replaced by a different shop from a guy that mainly works on motorcycles, and no i was definitely not satisfied with his work but that's a long story. When he replaced the valves he cut the valve seats. 3 of the 4 valves slide smoothly into the guides the full length of travel while the fourth (exhaust valve on cyl 1) slides smoothly once the area for the keepers is sticking out the back of the guide. All four have essentially no wiggle when checked with the valve 1/4" or so off the seat. That is definitely a good point that the bronze will wear and not the valve but should i be concerned about the 1 valve that doesn't slide easily the full length of the valve? In reality it should never move that far but this is my first rebuild and it's safe to say i'm concerned about everything  ;D

And Denward the goal is to have this thing back in the frame for spring. Life has been busy and I'm sad to say I haven't ridden this thing in almost two years.

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2025, 05:44:48 AM »
The machine shop i originally took the cylinders to was the Walker Machine Shop, and the reason they weren't concerned about the scratch was due to it ending below the travel of the compression ring. But when measured the scratch comes about 32mm from the top of the cylinders, which seems like it would be a potential issue? The cylinders measured on the tighter side of the spec prior to honing. The shop did a real hone and the cross hatching goes the full length of the bore, the shadow just hides it. The shop confirmed they were still in spec when i picked them up but I'll re-measure them later today to confirm.

I originally used heat with some flat ground aluminum from work when trying to re-seat the cylinder sleeves but was only able to get them close to flush resulting in a few areas that  are .005" proud. Maybe a shop would have better luck with this? Or should i try bolting the head and cylinders together and stick those in the oven to try and get things flat?

The valve guides were replaced by a different shop from a guy that mainly works on motorcycles, and no i was definitely not satisfied with his work but that's a long story. When he replaced the valves he cut the valve seats. 3 of the 4 valves slide smoothly into the guides the full length of travel while the fourth (exhaust valve on cyl 1) slides smoothly once the area for the keepers is sticking out the back of the guide. All four have essentially no wiggle when checked with the valve 1/4" or so off the seat. That is definitely a good point that the bronze will wear and not the valve but should i be concerned about the 1 valve that doesn't slide easily the full length of the valve? In reality it should never move that far but this is my first rebuild and it's safe to say i'm concerned about everything  ;D

And Denward the goal is to have this thing back in the frame for spring. Life has been busy and I'm sad to say I haven't ridden this thing in almost two years.

1) Do know what the actual taper and piston to cylinder wall clearance actually are, numbers?    Not what they said…

Sometimes valve stem lock (keepers) wear the stem causing the od of the stem to be larger from the metal mushrooming. The same can happen to the tip from the rocker arm adjuster tip wearing it.

2) are your valves old or new?     New valves won’t have any damage, they move in the guide the same all the way in and out once started in the guide straight. There won’t be any tight and loose spots.

Old valves will have wear on the stems within in their travel range, think camshaft lift here.  Outside their lift range the stem won’t have any wear. So you’ll get the loose/tight movement, loose where the valve stem is worn vs tight where there is no wear. The keeper area and tip can still be damaged and cause a good stem to act tight and loose also. No shop can ream the guide to fit the worn part of the stem and have adequate clearance to install them or to be used with a higher lift camshaft..

Heat, with your cylinder sleeves installed standing “proud” may not work as well since the sleeves will heat also with the aluminum. True at different rates of expansion, all though it won’t be as much difference as extremely cold sleeves rapidly place in a very hot aluminum block..you might have to heat the block and quench the cylinder to get them to move now.  You might be better off removing them, heating the block to kitchen oven max and having the sleeves in dry ice, then push them down until home and hold them until the two temperatures equalize enough for the block to hold them captive..

3) Do you remember if your sleeve were standing proud before during disassembly?
    If the top was machined without the sleeves installed then all the sleeves should be a little proud..
Age Quod Agis

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2025, 06:56:52 AM »
1) I'd take these measurements with a grain of salt as i was using cheap telescoping gauges from Harbor Freight and Budget micrometers but prior to honing the taper and out of roundness for each cylinder was less than .001". The Piston to wall clearance was close to .0005"/side (.001" total). I'll remeasure a little later today and can report back what the current measurements are.

2) The exhaust valves are new and shouldn't have any wear on them at all, so all the stiction i'm feeling is a result of the valve bore. When looking down the bore of the guides all of them look rough and have sort of spiraling from the drill bit. I don't have any telescoping gauges that will fit in the guide to measure the bore.

3) I pulled these apart so long ago and don't seem to have anything in my notes about measuring the deck for flatness until after they were painted. I believe i am the fourth owner of this bike so i can't say for sure the previous owner did not deck the cylinder at some point.

If i were to remove and re install the sleeves is there risk of causing the cylinders to come out of round (assuming after the honing they still are in spec) or any other damage? To remove them would you just warm them in the oven enough that the aluminum expands and try to get them to drop out? We actually have snow here in durham today so maybe i could use that to my advantage for reinserting them.

Offline bryanj

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,118
  • CB500 Number 1000036
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2025, 07:18:26 AM »
The valve that sticks is probably because of a burr on the keeper groove or a slight mushrooming of the tip, repeatedly inserting and removing will damage the guide but once in if it moves free from closedvto fully openbit will be fine
Semi Geriatric ex-Honda mechanic and MOT tester (UK version of annual inspection). Garage full of "projects" mostly 500/4 from pre 73 (no road tax in UK).

Remember "Its always in the last place you look" COURSE IT IS YOU STOP LOOKIN THEN!

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2025, 02:18:16 PM »
I re-measured my cylinders and pistons and got the following
                        
                       1                           2                          3                                 4   
                 x       y               x               y               x               y               x             y
top           2.4017      2.402   2.4016   2.4015   2.4017   2.4019   2.4018   2.4018
center   2.4018   2.4019   2.402   2.4018   2.4018   2.4018   2.4019   2.4018
bottom   2.4019   2.4021   2.4022   2.4026   2.402   2.4022   2.402   2.4019
avg      2.4018   2.4020   2.4019   2.4020   2.4018   2.4020      2.40         2.4018
                        
Piston   2.4                      2.4002              2.4005              2.4   
clearance   0.0018   0.0020   0.0017   0.0018   0.00133   0.0015   0.0019   0.0018
/side         0.0009   0.0010   0.0009   0.0009   0.0007   0.0007   0.0010   0.0009


From this it looks like with the previous honing my wall to wall clearance has opened up slightly but everything appears to still be in spec. My two questions remaining for the cylinders are:
1) Do i ignore the scratch that starts 32mm from the top of cylinder to and goes all the way to the bottom? With the wall thickness it seems like if i want to remove the scratch my only option is to go 1 over bore.
2) If i attempt to remove and reinsert the sleeves to get them flush with the cylinder deck will i potentially need to re-hone and ultimately overbore the cylinders anyway? Or is there another way to attempt to get the sleeves flush with the top without any lasting impact?

For the valve guides i can see on valve 1 that there are two bright spots where I'm assuming where the valve guide may be rubbing... Its pretty small and tough to picture so it could be me seeing something that isn't really there. I'm open to any suggestions here. The valves do seem to move smoothly once installed its just that initial assembly that is sticky and has me nervous.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2025, 02:20:29 PM by jmelton »

Offline bryanj

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,118
  • CB500 Number 1000036
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2025, 02:37:20 PM »
Use a light stone on the valve hight spots and as for the scratch it will run but not at 100% it will be fine to run as a normal bike but will use a small amount of oil so keep an eye on level
Semi Geriatric ex-Honda mechanic and MOT tester (UK version of annual inspection). Garage full of "projects" mostly 500/4 from pre 73 (no road tax in UK).

Remember "Its always in the last place you look" COURSE IT IS YOU STOP LOOKIN THEN!

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2025, 02:47:18 PM »
Good job,
Read what I posted on standard pistons. Glancing you look pretty straight for used..Fodged pistons may give you an alternative but I need to reread your post to see if that’s in your cards..
I’ve got to pick up my nephew at school.
I catch up later afterwards homecoming something?..
Age Quod Agis

Offline denward17

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,463
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2025, 02:52:45 PM »
What piston/cylinder wall clearance is ok to use?

I know during my K8 build it was recommended to go .0008", how much is too much?

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2025, 04:30:15 PM »
I've seen .0008" recommended and i'd agree that would probably be what i asked for if i overbore to remove the scratch in cylinder 2. But the manual says the service limits are 2.4055" and 2.3957" for the cylinder and piston respectively, which i fit within. I believe i have the original standard pistons (see pictures), i'm assuming those are cast and not forged?

I'm not gonna say my measurements are exact as i'm using fairly cheap equipment so the actual measurement could be +/- a few thousandths but the wall to wall clearance should at least be fairly accurate as i was using the same micrometers for all measurements. I did repeat measurements and they all came out within a few tenths of each other if not the same.  Also, its currently 40 f in my garage so the pistons and potentially the cylinders could be measuring slightly smaller than there normal value at a more reasonable temperature of 70 f or so.

Offline denward17

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,463
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2025, 06:53:26 PM »
Is there a number on the skirt near the wrist pin?

They look like Honda pistons, but the number will tell us.

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2025, 09:29:25 PM »
I've seen .0008" recommended and i'd agree that would probably be what i asked for if i overbore to remove the scratch in cylinder 2. But the manual says the service limits are 2.4055" and 2.3957" for the cylinder and piston respectively, which i fit within. I believe i have the original standard pistons (see pictures), i'm assuming those are cast and not forged?

I'm not gonna say my measurements are exact as i'm using fairly cheap equipment so the actual measurement could be +/- a few thousandths but the wall to wall clearance should at least be fairly accurate as i was using the same micrometers for all measurements. I did repeat measurements and they all came out within a few tenths of each other if not the same.  Also, its currently 40 f in my garage so the pistons and potentially the cylinders could be measuring slightly smaller than there normal value at a more reasonable temperature of 70 f or so.

Good job..
You’re on the right track..
I like to zero the taper indicator in the bottom inch of the cylinder opposite the piston’s major and minor thrust sides.
Yes that means it’s in line and parallel to the where the piston pin would be traveling. This should be the original bore diameter from Honda because no rings or piston shirts have traveled here.
Still in the bottom 1 inch of the cylinder bore, then I rotate the indicator 90* so it measuring between the major and minor thrust sides. Where the piston shirts have/may have worn the bottom of the cylinder bore. Record the indicator reading and compare to your zero sideways reading. If there is any difference this is how much the bottom of the cylinder is worn egg shaped.
While still in the bottom 1 inch of the bore slowly and still measuring the minor and major side of the cylinder wall, slowly draw the taper gauge steady up the cylinder to the top ring groove while monitoring the total movement of the indicator. From the bottom to top indicator readings is total taper, record reading. Subtract top ring groove indicated reading from sideway zero set up. This is total wear from original bore. Turn indicator 90* to measure for egg shape at top of bore. If any difference record. If you can repeat the measurements your set up is valid.

With the taper gauge still zeroed from the sideways bottom 1 inch cylinder bores zero, find and measure the piston’s shirt’s largest diameter perpendicular to the pin and lock the outside micrometer’s lock mechanism. Place the still zeroed taper indicator between the outside micrometer’s pads. This is your piston to cylinder wall clearance at the bottom of the cylinder.
Rezero taper indicator at the top ring groove or largest area indicated by your taper gauge. Then place the taper gauge between the pads of your still locked outside micrometer. This is your piston to cylinder wall clearance at the top of the cylinder..

This is the same or similar procedure used by many because it eliminates most inconsistencies and stacking of errors..

Egg shape cylinder’s adds its own compromises to this also but usually it all gets looser as you go up in the used cylinders.

Thats where using forged piston may allow you another option if your clearances are getting close to the replacement size.. The forged pistons generally need quite a bit more piston to cylinder wall clearance new. As compared to 0.0008 cast minimum clearance.  Your forged piston manufacturer will recommend the preferred clearance for the intended usage. Racing, street, blown, etc.. but even with iron sleeves and an aluminum block forged pistons will require quite a bit more clearance depending on their alloy.. how much it could be 0.001- 0.002 thousands more. Basically making a worn out cylinder new size for a forged piston application…

For example a stock mid 70’s 350 4inch cast SB Chevy piston could be fitted as tight as 0.0008 to as loose as 0.0018.
But the factory gm 4 inch TRW forged T slot piston required at least 0.0035 minimum and you had to break them in properly so they would heat cycle season (shrink) before any sustained wide open throttle operation.. And a high performance TRW drilled oil holes returns (no T slot drains) piston required 0.0045 minimum and up to 0.007 depending on boost and or nitrous.. so what I’m implying is forged pistons generally can/may allow you to use a junk block (for cast pistons) as a new block for forged pistons.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2025, 09:43:02 PM by Tracksnblades1 »
Age Quod Agis

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2025, 04:40:56 AM »
I'm pretty sure there is a number on the side of the piston, I'll take a look when i get back and and report back what it is.

Tracksnblades1, would these measurements be different from those i made with telescoping gauges and a micrometer? From my measurements cylinder 1 and 2 have the greatest out of roundness at .0003" (top of cylinder) and .0004" (bottom of cylinder) respectively. And all piston to wall clearances appear to be under the maximum standard spec of .0021". I don't have a bore gauge, do you think it would provide more additional insight over using telescoping gauges and a micrometer for these measurements?

I've cleaned up and attached a picture of the table of my measurements, i couldn't get the formatting right in my previous post.

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2025, 12:32:41 PM »
They shouldn’t be if you did a very good job with the snap gauge and accurately read to the ten thousands and didn’t make any math errors.

The zeroed indicator method used properly only measures clearance. No calibrations no read errors..
Needle usually only moves 0.0008-0.005 which is always the direct taper and clearance/wear..
I’ve seen some go fast engines with fuel and boost purposely set up with 0.010 where
longevity is not the concern. Heard of some with considerable more..😳

Like PeWe indicated somewhere, straight and round is key.
Picture all three of the rings trying to squirm in and out of the ring lands at 8,500+.
Trying to be round and smaller at the bottom and funneling out bigger while under
 compression trying to follow the larger diameter. usually up close to the top.
 Even worse if the top of your cylinder is slightly egg shaped. Once your rings are
finally at the top of the cylinder now during the Big Bang they try to contain all that
combustion on the way down getting shoved back in the ring land as the smaller
less worn bore force them to. Sometimes in a short distance depending on the length
Of the stroke.. think what happing to your new ring lands and you new rings at 8500+.
All while trying to keep the oil down and the compression/combustion up top with minimal
Blowby..

Your new rings are round not egg shaped and most have been lapped to a round cylinder. How
do you think they’ll seal up in an egg shell shaped cylinder. Its needs to be round at the top
because that’s where the Big Bang is..Even if they wear in to the egg shape, most cylinders
stay rounder at the bottom. Round and straight is what rings need..😇

Doing good, check twice. 👍
Age Quod Agis

Offline Tracksnblades1

  • My Son was a collegiate competition Trap, Skeet, and sporting Clay
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,909
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2025, 12:51:30 PM »
Am I reading your chart right?
Your bores all measure bigger at the bottom..?
🤔🤔🤔🤔

http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=196280.0;fs=41135;attach=507387
Age Quod Agis

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2025, 05:41:02 PM »
You are reading that table correctly, for some reason cylinders 2 and three both seemed to measure slightly wider at the bottom of the bore than the top. It didn't really make sense to me but i figured i'd post the measurements as they were recorded  :o.

I checked my pistons and they are marked with 392 which matches my head and i'm assuming that means that they are indeed the original pistons and therefore cast?

Honestly, I am leaning slightly towards taking my cylinders back to a shop and going with a slight overbore to return me to factory specs and remove the scratch in cylinder 2. If the shop did right by Denward hopefully i will have the same outcome. I'll probably remeasure everything tomorrow and then make my decision.

Offline denward17

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,463
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #20 on: January 23, 2025, 06:25:30 PM »
You are reading that table correctly, for some reason cylinders 2 and three both seemed to measure slightly wider at the bottom of the bore than the top. It didn't really make sense to me but i figured i'd post the measurements as they were recorded  :o.

I checked my pistons and they are marked with 392 which matches my head and i'm assuming that means that they are indeed the original pistons and therefore cast?

Honestly, I am leaning slightly towards taking my cylinders back to a shop and going with a slight overbore to return me to factory specs and remove the scratch in cylinder 2. If the shop did right by Denward hopefully i will have the same outcome. I'll probably remeasure everything tomorrow and then make my decision.

I don't think it is advisable to rebore without new oversize pistons.

Offline bryanj

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,118
  • CB500 Number 1000036
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #21 on: January 23, 2025, 07:23:39 PM »
Any overbore needs oversize piston kits
Semi Geriatric ex-Honda mechanic and MOT tester (UK version of annual inspection). Garage full of "projects" mostly 500/4 from pre 73 (no road tax in UK).

Remember "Its always in the last place you look" COURSE IT IS YOU STOP LOOKIN THEN!

Offline scottly

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,399
  • Humboldt, AZ
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #22 on: January 23, 2025, 07:47:27 PM »
the manual says the service limits are 2.4055" and 2.3957" for the cylinder and piston respectively, which i fit within. I believe i have the original standard pistons (see pictures), i'm assuming those are cast and not forged?

Since your pistons and cylinders are well within the service limits, unless you want to spend a bunch of dollars, you might consider fitting new standard size rings and bolting it together. ;) Same for the head; you've already spent the money, so you might as well give it a try. ;D
Don't fix it if it ain't broke!
Helmets save brains. Always wear one and ride like everyone is trying to kill you....

Offline jmelton

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #23 on: January 24, 2025, 04:14:27 AM »
I think my previous post was a little ambiguous, if I went with an overbore I would definitely get new pistons and rings.

This is my first rebuild and I've definitely been paranoid and second guessing myself a lot. I'll probably still remeasure the the cylinders tonight to ensure my previous measurements were correct as well as try to get the sleeves sitting flush. Is the scratch coming within 32mm of the top of the bore not a concern? I guess worst case it just smokes and burns some oil?

I've definitely been waffling back and forth but you are probably right Scottly, maybe i just slap it together and get some more miles on the bike and if it smokes or has issues i'll tackle it next winter.

Offline scottly

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,399
  • Humboldt, AZ
Re: 1978 Cb750 K Rebuild Questions
« Reply #24 on: January 24, 2025, 07:57:58 AM »
How hot did you get the cylinder block when trying to re-seat the sleeves? I think guys usually heat it up to 350 degrees for about 15-20 minutes. Make sure the block is supported with the bottom of the sleeves free to drop down.
Don't fix it if it ain't broke!
Helmets save brains. Always wear one and ride like everyone is trying to kill you....