Someone asked the question that I've always wanted to ask - what influence does the exhaust setup on a 4 stroke engine have on carburation? Rejetting is frequently said to be necessary when the exhaust is modified. I say horse $hit, it don't make no difference.
Based on what evidence, theory, or placement of a wild hair?
Compare a restrictive exhaust to free flowing.
Restrictive exhaust generally has a higher muffler/pipe chamber pressure. This leads to less complete evacuation of exhaust gases from the combustion chamber. The fresh charge from the intake stroke then mixes with the leftovers. And, the available oxygen must be matched in correct ratio to the fuel. This mixture will be leaner than if a complete evacuation of the exhaust gas was made as some hydrocarbons remain from the previous combustion cycle. A more open exhaust generally requires a richer mixture to compensate for the lack of back pressure.
A 4 into 1 is supposed to use the exhaust velocity of other cylinders, to help evacuate the cylinder currently in the exhaust stroke, creating a scavenge effect. This is usually tuned to have an effect at the higher RPM range. Again the more complete change of combustible charge requires a fuel ratio enrichment to go along with the higher availability of oxygen in the chamber.
Since the SOHC4 carbs have no information about what is in the exhaust stream (like an Ox sensor in modern computer controlled systems) the carburetor must be adjusted to provide the correct mixture with the given engine breathing parameters. This generally involves jetting.
I could, of course be wrong (along with a lot of other carb tuners).
But, I'm willing to hear explanations of why exhaust changes do not have a jetting repercussion.
Cheers,