Author Topic: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?  (Read 5535 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« on: May 02, 2007, 02:57:12 PM »
I'm pretty sure they didn't. So what did? I ended up with this front end, labeled as a CB350 front end. And well..I don't think it is...any thoughts?

Steve

Offline nickjtc

  • I was numero dieci
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,210
  • Yamaha XT500 'Gromit'
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2007, 02:59:12 PM »
Do you have a pic?
Nick J. Member #3247

2008 Triumph Tiger 1050
1977 Suzuki GS750

"That which does not kill us reminds us to wear proper motorcycle clothing...."

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2007, 03:09:10 PM »
Not handy...I temporarily reassembled them. Hell, gimme two shakes. I'll post one up.

Steve

Here we are..




Thoughts?
« Last Edit: May 02, 2007, 03:15:09 PM by SClay115 »

Offline ohiocaferacer

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
  • www.OHIOCAFERACERS.com
    • OHIO CAFE RACERS
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2007, 07:24:40 PM »
1969 thru 1971 all had external fork springs.

The only CB350 twins to have internal springs were the 1972 CB350K4 and the 1973 CB350G(the one with the front disc).

Those definately look like early model CB350 forks.

Later,
Greg


Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2007, 07:32:01 PM »
Hm, any real downside to using these then? If they are for the bike, then why not use them ya know? Just wanted to make sure before I go about fitting them. Seems like a really cool conversation piece. Also, could I potentially run them without the spring shields? just so the springs are visable?

Steve


Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,557
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2007, 07:44:55 PM »
Wild guess.... 305?
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2007, 03:55:20 PM »
OK, is there any one who can confirm/deny for sure that this is/is not a 350 Twin front end from the early era? The fork seals I have gotten are incorrect, and I need to make sure the front end I'm looking at isn't for something totally different...

Steve

Offline ohiocaferacer

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
  • www.OHIOCAFERACERS.com
    • OHIO CAFE RACERS
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2007, 04:29:18 PM »
You have a set of 1969 -1971 Honda CB350 forks.

Offline Green550F

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 340
  • Nothing is as cool as that which you made.
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2007, 04:52:06 PM »
my bike has the same rusty tubes!  :o  Any plan as to what to do about it? ??? do they need to be replaced?
93 Kawasaki Voyager XII
70 Honda CL350 Cafe

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2007, 07:02:38 PM »
my bike has the same rusty tubes!  :o  Any plan as to what to do about it? ??? do they need to be replaced?

Well, that highly rusty portion isn't where the seal rides. Which is good. Just where the headlight brackets are, and the clamps. There is a bit of corrosion on one of the tubes in the 'sliding' portion. But there isn't a thing I can do about it. I knocked it down with some steel wool, and it's pretty flush, but not perfect. Have no clue what to do about it, if anything..

Steve

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2007, 07:06:34 PM »
You have a set of 1969 -1971 Honda CB350 forks.

Greg is it? Thanks, I appreciate it.

Steve

chrisf

  • Guest
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #11 on: May 07, 2007, 01:10:12 PM »
Those are exactly like my 69's.

--Chris

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #12 on: May 07, 2007, 01:18:49 PM »
Those are exactly like my 69's.

--Chris

Good to hear Chris. By the way, that is an awesome logo you made up. The one as your avatar. I think you mentioned a while back you were figuring out ideas for it. Turned out awesome.

Steve

chrisf

  • Guest
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #13 on: May 07, 2007, 01:22:49 PM »
Thanks! I think it will look cool on the side of the tank. I'm have t shirts printed now as well. The final logo will be moto.fiaccone--not all one word as it is now.

BTW are you going to run your springs exposed?

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #14 on: May 07, 2007, 01:26:23 PM »
Thanks! I think it will look cool on the side of the tank. I'm have t shirts printed now as well. The final logo will be moto.fiaccone--not all one word as it is now.

BTW are you going to run your springs exposed?

I'm seriously considering it. I think it would be an interesting point on the front end. My only concern is the small amount of corrosion I have on the fork tubes, which might be an eye sore in contrast...Not sure yet. Maybe I'll just mock it up and see what it looks like first, see where it takes me then. By the way. I want a shirt.  ;D

Steve

chrisf

  • Guest
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #15 on: May 07, 2007, 01:40:18 PM »
Yeah, I think the spring will look cool exposed. I too am considering it. If the springs are powdercoated or epoxy painted, there should be no corrosion.

I printed three white shirts with a white reflective logo and three black shirts with the logo in black reflective. They are all fitted medium shirts from American Apparel. Expensive shirts, but the best. If you seriously want one, I'm sure we can work something out.

--Chris

Offline SClay115

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 224
Re: CB350 Twins didn't have external fork springs did they?
« Reply #16 on: May 07, 2007, 01:49:15 PM »
Yeah, I think the spring will look cool exposed. I too am considering it. If the springs are powdercoated or epoxy painted, there should be no corrosion.

I printed three white shirts with a white reflective logo and three black shirts with the logo in black reflective. They are all fitted medium shirts from American Apparel. Expensive shirts, but the best. If you seriously want one, I'm sure we can work something out.

--Chris

Well it's not the springs that I'm worried about corroding. It's the corrosion already present on the tubes themselves. But, like I said, not sure there is anything I can do about it. So I'll just make sure it's not positioned to the outside, and therefore not super apparent. But yeah I'm seriously interested in a shirt. Email or message me on here, let me know what you want for one.

Steve
Spacemanspiff115@yahoo.com