tsflstb,
No problem at all... in fact I think you might have hit the nail on the head by describing it as "raw". I just attributed that to the fact that it was a twin instead of a four cylinder, but I don't really know???
From the reading I have done it sounds like the real advantage to the parallel twin is compactness. It is narrower in width than an inline four, and shorter in length than a v-twin. It is a pretty small engine but still makes about 60hp. The reports on fuel mileage have been outstanding too.
You are right though, my 550 is smoother. Also, I have no dillusions about the fact that the Versys will not look as good in 33 years (or possibly even 10
) as my cb550f does. I don't know, maybe no one in 1975 looked at my bike on the showroom floor and said, "in three decades that is still going to be one sexy antique" but... I just don't think that modern bikes are built to the same standards that these old all-metal works of art were. It's a shame really..
Bob550four,
Yes, I have been very encouraged by the reviews of the ninja 650r! I chose the versys because it has increased travel suspension that is adjustible front and back, its motor has been retuned for more torque, the bike holds almost a gallon more fuel, and the seating position fits me a little better. They say the frame is different from the 650r with more bracing but I haven't looked that closely yet.
Edit: And as for looks, I would have preferred something more classic looking but there aren't a lot of alternatives in this class right now - and I suspect I would have to give up some function in the process. The "Alf the alien" headlight turns a lot of people off but it has grown on me over the last year and I really like the looks of the bike. My last big bike was a DL1000 V-strom and I prefer this to that.
Cheers,
- Chad