Actually DarkRider, research has found that price has doesn't have everything to do with protection value when it comes to a helmet.
Here's a snippet from WebBikeWorld.com's review:
Do inexpensive DOT-approved helmets protect better than helmets than expensive Snell-approved helmets? The June 2005 Motorcyclist magazine addressed this controversy. That issue contains a detailed article on an extensive test that was conducted on 16 different motorcycle helmets, ranging from the $89.00 Z1R (wBW review) to the $700.00 Schuberth S1 (wBW review). Their conclusion is that the inexpensive, polycarbonate shell Z1R transferred an average of 152Gs to the head-form, vs. 211Gs of the Snell-approved Scorpion EXO-700.
Also, the UK's RIDE magazine tested 28 helmets in the May 2005 issue. While the testing methodology was slightly different, they also found that the HJC AC-11 provided the second best impact absorption of the lot. Could it be that a motorcycle helmet doesn't necessarily have to be expensive to provide good protection?
There's much, much more to the story, and we strongly suggest reading both articles and studying this subject before you buy your next helmet. One of the conclusions in the Motorcyclist magazine article is that a softer polycarbonate DOT-only approved helmet may provide the highest levels of protection.
http://www.webbikeworld.com/motorcycle-helmets/motorcycle-helmet-faq.htmI think that comfort and quality have a lot more to do with price than protection does. If you buy a cheap helmet, it will probably be ill-fitting and noisy and uncomfortable (though not always), whereas if you buy a $900 Arai helmet, it will be quiet and comfy and fit like a glove (though not always
)