Okay, I just read the first article, proposing that the NPS should have decided the 2000 election. Odd. Some suppositions I don't agree with.
The NPS is typically conservative? I realize that law enforcement is typically conservative, and a majority of the NPS ranks are law enforcement trained, but the 2 that I've gotten to know don't come close to fitting his description. It's been my observation that conservatives aren't that interested in conserving our resources or the land where these resources reside. After all, wasn't it the Bush administration that added "mining" to the list of approved activities(like hiking,camping...) one can do in our National Parks?
And while I'm not opposed to a "co-presidency", I'd like to think that Lewis and Clark, while different from each other, had considerably more in common with each other than Bush and Gore. I will agree that a 4 year boat trip with Bush and Gore is a terrifying thought.