Author Topic: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil  (Read 15449 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mattcb350f

  • Hardly a
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,625
  • 1974 CB350F
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #100 on: July 10, 2008, 08:10:52 AM »
I wasn't gonna say nothin'

but I switched briefly to sythtetic and my lil' 350F started sweating it out like a whure in church.

Switched back to conventional and leaks have subsided.

....like this pot needed any more stiring  :P

 Matt.
1974 CB350F,  1980 CB125S,  1981 XL80S
Non Honda's: 86 & 87 Husqvarna 400wr's

My CB350F resto: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=30467.0
Gallery at:
http://gallery.sohc4.net/main.php?g2_itemId=298318

upperlake04

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #101 on: July 10, 2008, 08:18:43 AM »
  After reading a thousand replies on the subject here, some opinion, some conjecture, and possibly some facts, the consensus appears to be that mineral based Shell Rotella 15-40 and synthetics are  good choices for our bikes.
  It is interesting to also read on the UK CX GL site that the consensus there is that Rotella (Rimula), as well as synthetics, are especially poor choices for the old bikes. 
  So far, the common advice, sort of, is to change it regularly.
 Hope this helps. ;D

 http://www.cx-gl.org.uk/
 Message Board - General - page 8 - OIL by harrye7471

Offline jmckinne

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 109
  • K4 CB750, Naked 76 GL 1000
    • Family site
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #102 on: July 10, 2008, 08:55:48 AM »
LOL upperlake, yep that's pretty much what you get. I went to a whole bunch of Rotella discussions threads and even dedicated Rotella forums (?) and opinion is all over the place. I decided to screw the anecdotal info and just try it.

I'm also skeptical of the whole "detergents wash out seals and make them leak" line of thot. But that theory is one I won't try putting to the test, that would be a lot of work. Anything's possible and the end result is the same in any case: puddle on ground, annoyed owner & pissed off spouse.

I don't think many serious people would try to argue that dino oil is a better lubricant than synthetic - it's clearly not. The oil industry says this itself. The question is, is synthetic better in a classic vehicle?

The answer to that for me is what I alluded to in my original BAP (big ass post) and what I do every time: try it in the vehicle in question. If the vehicle in question holds it, doesn't burn it, and keeps it's operating temps in the green then I continue to run synthetic in that vehicle with joy. Ok, well, maybe joy is stretching it ;)






eldar

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #103 on: July 10, 2008, 09:38:35 AM »
Well have you pulled the cam chain tensioner apart ever? Bet there is gunk from oil in there. That same gunk can stick to seals which would then be removed by the synthetic.

Offline jbailey

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #104 on: July 10, 2008, 09:51:04 PM »
Since this is now a totally beaten up subject and the year is 2008, why does the FAQ on this board still have this 1978 mentality listed as if it were a fact?

Quote
Don’t use synthetics. Synthetics have a reputation for a high detergent action. That is, if you have an old engine that has some sludge or deposits internally, the synthetic will sometimes remove it in chunks. There is some risk of plugging or restricting the oil pickup
screen, which would starve the engine of oil. It also affects some old seals adversely causing them to leak (from shrinkage if I remember correctly) and often leads to clutch slippage (see Clutch FAQ for clutch slippage comments).

That's NOT information, it's MISinformation!  It is even worse, it is an incorrect opinion which is based on nothing scientific, but MISinformation and is misleading or even a lie.

I have written to Glenn a couple of times and asked him to remove the incorrect statements from the OIL FAQ, but it is still there.  It should be embarassing to have "information" like this on the website twenty or thirty years after it was controversial.

Let's all ask Glenn to correct or at least remove the misinformation from the FAQ.
1975 Honda CB550K
2005 Kawasaki ZG1000 Concours

Offline Buber

  • A bit of spanner spinner, but definitely not a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 397
  • #820 on old mailing list.... :)
    • Mountain Chalets in Polands
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #105 on: July 10, 2008, 11:42:21 PM »
  It is interesting to also read on the UK CX GL site that the consensus there is that Rotella (Rimula), as well as synthetics, are especially poor choices for the old bikes. 
  So far, the common advice, sort of, is to change it regularly.
 Hope this helps. ;D
 http://www.cx-gl.org.uk/
 Message Board - General - page 8 - OIL by harrye7471
Yep, I went there & read it. It turns out that (as usual) you can prove whatever you want by being picky. One of their argument is "it's not in the manual, so you can't use it". Now, if you look at nearly all bike manuals pre-middle nineties, they will all say to lubricate the chain with oil - yet everybody uses spray. Manuals pre-90 will say to fill the front forks with engine oil, yet today everybody uses fork oil. WTF??

So, I'm sorry, but following a book religiously to the letter is good... when it's the Bible or Koran (and even they you can go very wrong).
Use the common sense (which is not that common  ;)) and you will live "happily ever after".

And besides, if I'm to pay 15$ for quart of semi-synth motorcycle oil, I will pay 9$/quart for semi-synth Rimula (Rotella) and I will be VERY happy with it. After all its' 25$ saved on a 1 change. Prices from Europe, y'know....
Welcome to my mountains!
Mountain Chalets

Offline jbailey

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #106 on: July 13, 2008, 08:45:57 PM »
Quote
Since this is now a totally beaten up subject and the year is 2008, why does the FAQ on this board still have this 1978 mentality listed as if it were a fact?


Quote
Don’t use synthetics. Synthetics have a reputation for a high detergent action. That is, if you have an old engine that has some sludge or deposits internally, the synthetic will sometimes remove it in chunks. There is some risk of plugging or restricting the oil pickup
screen, which would starve the engine of oil. It also affects some old seals adversely causing them to leak (from shrinkage if I remember correctly) and often leads to clutch slippage (see Clutch FAQ for clutch slippage comments).


That's NOT information, it's MISinformation!  It is even worse, it is an incorrect opinion which is based on nothing scientific, but MISinformation and is misleading or even a lie.

I have written to Glenn a couple of times and asked him to remove the incorrect statements from the OIL FAQ, but it is still there.  It should be embarassing to have "information" like this on the website twenty or thirty years after it was controversial.

Let's all ask Glenn to correct or at least remove the misinformation from the FAQ.

Wow, that hits the nail on the head!
1975 Honda CB550K
2005 Kawasaki ZG1000 Concours

Offline crazypj

  • I'm brill, me
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,467
  • first 100,000 miles. 1977 CB550F
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #107 on: July 16, 2008, 12:23:50 AM »
To those who have read this before, I apologize. But, I couldn't resist  ::)
Beware of synthetic oil, it can do terrible things to you and your beloved motorcycle. It will not only leak out of your engine faster than you can put it in, but it will also cause your oil filter to clog and implode, dumping debris and dirt into your lubrication system. It also will make every part of your bike permanently slippery because of its linear molecular chain dispersion action.
Then it will leak onto your kickstand causing it to retract automatically, dropping your bike on the ground! But that's not all...
Synthetic oil will round off your gears and spin your bearings. It will also splatter onto your seat causing your girlfriend to fall off in the apex of a turn and she'll never ride with you again. Synthetic oil coats your sight window and your timing window with a whitish
pro-emulsification additive that is both non-removable and highly corrosive. Synthetic oil will completely leak onto the ground overnight and your dog will drink it and die.
Synthetic oil will wear out your tires and make your battery leak. It will give you the desperate need to urinate after you put your full leathers on and then jam your zippers shut. It will contaminate your gasoline causing your bike to stall on railroad tracks and accelerate uncontrollably near police cars. It will make it rain during rallies and on weekends. It will lubricate your timing belts causing them to jump teeth and break your valves to bits. Synthetic oil chemically weakens desmodromic valves and causes the clearances to change every six miles. Then it melts the black soles of your riding boots right before you walk across your new carpeting.
While riding past groups of attractive women it will cause both of your handlebar grips to slip off at the same time so you smash your windscreen with the bridge of your nose. It also causes your swingarm to crack, your studs to break, and your rotors to warp, and then it voids your warranty by changing your odometer reading to 55,555. It
also dries out your wetclutch and wets your dryclutch. It makes your clutch slave cylinder seal fail in the heaviest traffic on the hottest day of the year while putting an angry wasp in your helmet for good measure.
Synthetic oil hides your 13mm socket and puts superglue on your earplugs. Synthetic oil will scratch your faceshield and make your gloves shrink two sizes night before trackday. Synthetic oil stole your neutral and sold it to the Chinese for $1.25. Synthetic oil will make you grow a tail. Synthetic oil will write long crazy e-mails to your Internet friends and then sign your name at the bottom!

Until I read right through this I started to think it was serious.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
PJ
I fake being smart pretty good
'you can take my word for it or argue until you find out I'm right'

Offline BobbyR

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,367
  • Proud Owner of the Babe Thread & Dirty Old Man
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #108 on: July 16, 2008, 06:32:18 AM »
There is also some specultion that symthetic oil fumes may cause erectile dysfunction. This has yet to be confirmed and further studies are in progress.
Dedicated to Sgt. Howard Bruckner 1950 - 1969. KIA LONG KHANH.

But we were boys, and boys will be boys, and so they will. To us, everything was dangerous, but what of that? Had we not been made to live forever?

Offline Roach Carver

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,725
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #109 on: July 16, 2008, 06:49:29 AM »
There is also some specultion that symthetic oil fumes may cause erectile dysfunction. This has yet to be confirmed and further studies are in progress.
I know it softens your hands, so it stands to reason that it would soften other things as well

eldar

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #110 on: July 16, 2008, 08:54:10 AM »
So now I have to ask, how would people know it does this? Wait, I don't want to know! :-X

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,558
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #111 on: July 16, 2008, 09:26:43 AM »
So now I have to ask, how would people know it does this? Wait, I don't want to know! :-X

You're soaking in it right now.

Oh, wait.  That's Palmolive.
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline cb650 bobber

  • Expert I ain't no stinken
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 968
  • stupid gloripope
"I make a point of staying right at the edge of poverty. I don't have a pair of pants without a hole in them, and the only pair of boots I have are on my feet. I don't mess around with unnecessary stuff, so I don't need much money. Von Dutch

eldar

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #113 on: July 22, 2008, 09:09:53 AM »
While old, it does point to auto oils being ok for motorcycles. Which can be concluded by the proof that many here use auto oils with no issues.

Markcb750

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #114 on: July 22, 2008, 10:07:08 AM »
If I send my receipt for Rottela 15w40 to the Chinese Ambassador, will he return my neutral safety light?


eldar

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #115 on: July 22, 2008, 10:36:34 AM »
um ok. Did something happen?

Markcb750

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #116 on: July 22, 2008, 12:18:04 PM »
"Synthetic oil stole your neutral and sold it to the Chinese for $1.25."

eldar

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #117 on: July 22, 2008, 02:05:10 PM »
hmm ok. But that is not synthetic. The 5-40 is the synthetic stuff.

Markcb750

  • Guest
Re: Synthetic versus non-synthetic oil
« Reply #118 on: July 22, 2008, 02:18:31 PM »
Guess I should have explained...