Author Topic: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?  (Read 17551 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kghost

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,855
  • www.facebook.com/RetroMecanicaAustralia
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #25 on: July 02, 2008, 01:58:02 PM »
Yes, if we were talking about salad dressing.  But engine oil and water? At operating temp there is only water vapour and engine oil, likewise the oil always displaces the acid water on metal surfaces, regardless of the suspension's homogeneity - However, my point was that unless we have empirical evidence we are both speculating here,  probably speculation that favours the oil industry and not necessarily the engine.

If you are referring to "oil sludge" there are other factors and explanations to consider, I believe.


Yeah at operating temperature....change your oil hot. Get it?

I don't get the "carbon in the oil". If oil goes past the piston rings or valve seals, oil is burnt. It is not the gas that goes past the rings; it is the oil that goes past the rings. The force of the explosion forces the piston downwards, and the piston creates pressure in the crankcase. Does really exhaust gases go to the crankcases? Or the smoke is just from the hot oil smouldering?

Yes its combustion gases. No ring system is totally sealed. Some combustion gets by. Thats why modern cars have a PCV to keep from pumping it into the atmosphere. Those hot gases and the rings will cook oil.

Another area of contamination is valve guides and seals.

Back to the oil, it is true that heavy particles sediment in the oil sump. Would the oil warming help in getting rid of them? I don't think so. The oil pan in my CB350 was full of sludge. But the oil pump is far away from it. No warming will make that sludge go to the oil pump. I get the "orange juice" example, but unless you lift your bike and vigorously shake it up and down, left and right, like a juice bottle, no oil circulation will help you dissolve the sludge in the bottom of the oil sump. Like if you drink the juice with a straw that only goes halfway in the bottle. No matter what the juice temperature is, if you stir the juice you will only stir and heat the upper layers, not the lower sediments.

Once the sludge forms...short of some type of cleaning or flush...your screwed. Point of changing hot is to minimize the sludge formation. Hot oil is alot better at suspending the crap in your oil. If you stir orange juice do you not get even some lower sediment? Yes you do.

New engine...hot oil changes...minimual sludge.

IMore "conventional wisdom": What about bird#$%* in the paint? Is it really that corrosive? Has somebody first-hand experience of faded paint due to bird #$%*? Swallows #$%* in my air conditioner external unit, the guano stays there for months and gets cleaned with the rain and I haven't noticed any difference in the paint. And we are talking a single layer of paint in an air conditioner, not the candy + colour`+ lacquer. Is the bird#$%* a myth of the conventional wisdom or there is truth in it? What's the difference between bird and human "residues"? Why should the bird residue be more corrosive than any other animal's?


Depends on the birds and what they eat. Also depends on the paint. Yeah I can walk outside and take a picture of the bed cover on my truck. Leave certain bird #$%* on it and it will break down the clearcoat.

Certain type of blackbird we have down here feast on oranges. You can bet its acidic.

Another example of "conventional wisdom". How many of you cut the plastic rings that keeps the six-packs together? You are very environment-conscious so you are avoiding some poor fish getting caught in this improvised net. Now think for a second where your garbage go. Do you think for a second that the garbage truck dumps your garbage to the ocean? It gets separated in its very first stage -we in Spain have different containers for plastics, paper, glass etc. And each type of residue goes to a different recycling plant. Irrespective of the plastic rings being cut or not, it will be recycled and will only see fish if it gets the form of a inflatable raft.

Yeah the rings make it into the ocean...never underestimate drunken sport fishermen. I doubt the ones in your recycling or trash make it there.


Anyways.....

Don't believe in contamination?

I'll give you and example.

Aircraft piston engines. Very similar to Air cooled motorcycle engines.

Lycoming, Continental, and Pratt and Whitney recommend hot oil changes.

Not the oil manufacturer...the engine manufacturer.

heres a qoute: http://www.lycoming.textron.com/support/tips-advice/key-reprints/pdfs/Key%20Operations.pdf

"Another contributor to a variety of engine problems, including valve sticking, is frequent long periods of inactivity. An engine should be flown regularly to stay in tiptop condition. The oil in the sump collects residue from combustion such as moisture, acid and lead sludge. Flying the aircraft tends to heat the oil enough to vaporize the moisture and help eliminate some of these contaminants, but an engine that is not flown will collect
moisture, acids and gums which may contribute to corrosion
and to valve-train problems. In addition to frequent flight, these contaminants are also eliminated from the engine by changing the oil."


"Some operators are running the engines on the ground in an attempt to prevent rust between infrequent
flights. This may harm rather than help the engine if the oil temperature is not brought up to approximately 165˚ F, because water and acids from combustion will accumulate
in the engine oil. The one best way to get oil temperature to 165˚ F is to fly the aircraft. During flight, the oil normally gets hot enough to vaporize the water and most acids and eliminate them from the oil. If the engine is merely ground run, the water accumulated in the oil will gradually turn to acid, which is also undesirable."






Stranger in a strange land

Offline Raul CB750K1

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,881
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #26 on: July 02, 2008, 02:16:08 PM »
Allright, I buy the acidic residue of some birds. I also buy the drunken fishermen -if they don't mind throwing gargabe at the ocean I don't think they are much concerned about fish getting caught in plastic rings-.

I'm even buying the "water in the oil". Even the carbon in the oil. The key is whether it is as bad as the say it is.

When I was a kid, my mom bathed us just once a week. Now I shower once a day. Some people say it is better to shower before going to bed, so you are cleaning out all the dirt and sweat of the day. Some others say to shower in the morning, so you get refreshed and is a great way to start the day. Both are valid points, but I'm sorry, I'm not going to get a shower before and after sleep.

So, what is better? To get a weekly shower? A daily shower? Sure enough, two showers a day is better than one, but does it really make such a big difference? What about oil? If oil contaminates, changing oil every 500 miles is better than changing oil every 1000 miles. The key is to find the perfect balance to use the oil wisely, not changing it just because it is suppoused to be bad now or to get obssesive like in personal hygiene. The same goes with "shelf life". I have used oil that I bought 4 years ago with no qualms whatsoever. I can buy that oil degrades, contaminates, even breaks under use. But sitting on a shelf???????

Offline mystic_1

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,071
  • 1970 CB750K
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #27 on: July 02, 2008, 02:38:14 PM »

but unless you lift your bike and vigorously shake it up and down, left and right, like a juice bottle



You mean, you don't do this?

(flexes biceps)

 ;D

mystic_1
"A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for."
- John Augustus Shedd

My build thread:  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=68952.0

Offline bistromath

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 730
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #28 on: July 02, 2008, 02:40:54 PM »
One of these days I'm just going to pay a tribologist a couple hundred bucks to post on this board and settle these dang arguments once and for all.
'75 CB550F

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,557
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #29 on: July 02, 2008, 03:04:55 PM »
What started as an interesting thought, is sounding more like the "conventional wisdom" makes more sense.  I will be putting some thought into the sludge issue, though.  Maybe I'll put the drain plug back in with some solvent of some kind after draining the oil and let it sit.  Or shake it around.

But Raul, there is a reason that, as kids, we only needed a bath once a week.  As kids, we didn't have the glands needed to give us that unmistakable aroma that is; teenager.  Once adolescence hits, once a day is sometimes not enough.
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline firecracker

  • At being Shameless, I'm an
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,080
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #30 on: July 02, 2008, 03:08:50 PM »
Conventional Wisdom?

At our most recent family gathering, my daughter was helping in the kitchen.  When she noticed my wife cutting off the end of the ham before putting it in the pan, she asked why.

"I don't know why, honey" my wife replied "that's just how we've always done it".

My daughter, being the persistent one, wanted to know WHY!

"Go ask your grandma, she'll know why".

"Grandma, why do you cut the end of the ham off before putting it in the pan?" my daughter asked.

"I don't really know.  That's just how mom always did it." was the response.

Not giving up, she went into the living room and woke up her great-grandma.

"Gigi, why did you teach grandma to cut off the end of the ham before cooking it?"

"Because, sweetie, my pan was too small."    :o    >:(    :-\    ;D

Other versions of this story, including a great one for electricians, here:
http://www.snopes.com/weddings/newlywed/secret.asp
Life is like a game of cards.  The hand you are dealt represents determinism.  The way you play it is free will.
  -  Jawaharal Nehru

Offline kghost

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,855
  • www.facebook.com/RetroMecanicaAustralia
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #31 on: July 02, 2008, 03:17:26 PM »
Showering twice a day is kinda like bird droppings....

Depends on what the bird does, and eats.  ;D
Stranger in a strange land

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,557
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #32 on: July 02, 2008, 03:18:33 PM »
I thought you were going to say there was sludge on the end!
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline kghost

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,855
  • www.facebook.com/RetroMecanicaAustralia
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #33 on: July 02, 2008, 03:19:28 PM »
I thought you were going to say there was sludge on the end!

 ;D there might be  ;D
Stranger in a strange land

Offline Buber

  • A bit of spanner spinner, but definitely not a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 397
  • #820 on old mailing list.... :)
    • Mountain Chalets in Polands
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2008, 05:47:16 AM »
Well, I've seen a mail passed around:
We, kids of (here enter teh decade) could go on bikes without helmets. If we scratched - we leraned better. We drank coke from the same bottle, and nobody died. There was no internet and MTV, yet we were able to have LOADS of fun just with friends, We could eat what we wanted, as people were not allergic to everything. It wasn't neccessary to use purelle every 5 minutes, and people seemed not to die because of it. There was no dyslexia or discaculia - if you couldn't write or do the math, you stayed another year in the class and you learned. there was no ADHD - there were kids with lots of energy. And so on, and so on....

Back to the oil - I can't afford changin oil  every 5 or 3 thou. Simple. I paid so little money for my bike (that runs great) that I'm not going to overinvest myself. I change oil every spring, as I believe in the acidic/water content, and definitely it's the biggest at the spring time.

And above all - your point of view depends on where you sit. If you are a passionate, classic Honda OWNER you will change oil every 2k, plugs every 5k, etc, if you are passionate classic Honda RIDER (with wife, kids, dog & mortgage) you will ride your bike and try to keep it in good technical shape.

And that's how I see it - after all I have a feeling that we change oil MAINLY for OUR good feeling, not the bike's. Bikes are kind-of unsensitive and don't have much feelings... ;D
Welcome to my mountains!
Mountain Chalets

Offline Gordon

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,114
  • 750K1, 550K2
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #35 on: July 07, 2008, 05:53:14 AM »

And above all - your point of view depends on where you sit. If you are a passionate, classic Honda OWNER you will change oil every 2k, plugs every 5k, etc, if you are passionate classic Honda RIDER (with wife, kids, dog & mortgage) you will ride your bike and try to keep it in good technical shape.


The two are not mutually exclusive.  I'm a passionate Honda OWNER and RIDER.

Offline goon 1492

  • Sucka Repellant
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,088
  • RIGHT ON TO THE REAL AND DEATH TO THE FAKERS
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #36 on: July 07, 2008, 06:48:55 AM »
I pick Wessner's approach.  Tim and Mystic's reasoning.

As for "chopping the oil".  The damage is primarily done to the additive long chain molecules that are used to make the oil behave as multi-vis.   The transmission will eventually turn a 10W-40 oil, into a 10W oil.  Still better than no oil.  But, there is less film strength at high temp and pressure between wearing metals.

The "turning black right away" is due to the heat changing it's photo-reflective properties, not it's lubricative properties.  So, you can't simply use color to determine oil change.  If the oil is still translucent dark/black, it's not condemned.  If it is murky opaque dark, it is, due to suspended particulates.  (filter can't remove them all, only the bigger ones.)

Or, so I believe.

+1 just because its black doesn't mean that its bad yet, and the film strength is why i use royal purple it has virtually no oxidation factor and 400+ times the film strength. ;D
We are not humans going thru a spiritual experience...
We are spirits going thru a human experience....

eldar

  • Guest
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #37 on: July 07, 2008, 07:28:36 AM »
I lean both ways I guess. I have never seen where a hot change has been better, I have never seen where a cold change is better. Maybe for an aircraft engine, a hot is better. That does not mean it is going to make a heap of difference for us. I guess the only way to know is to have someone rebuild their engine fresh. run it 15000 miles, change oil while hot. Run it again for the same number of miles and change cold. Tear engine down and see if there is any difference.

A lot of work, and maybe not even that accurate and people will still probably disagree with the results.

I change whenever. Sometimes hot, sometimes cold. I never have chunks come out at any time. My oil pretty much always looks the same, no layer of water.

So my thoughts are that a hot change does not always need to be done. Once in every 3 changes is probably sufficient.

Offline dpen

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #38 on: July 07, 2008, 08:04:29 AM »
I'm with KGHOST - as an apprentice back in the dark ages we were told the reasons for hot oil changes (particles in suspension etc)
  as for just topping up oil, try that on a motor like a 650 BSA with only a plain metal bearing on the timing side of the crank - the longevity of my "egg" was due to the religious oil changes
  ok - so the motor sh*t itself BUT the timing end of the crank was perfect

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,557
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #39 on: July 07, 2008, 08:44:55 AM »
So, if you won a battle, but lost the war, you still consider it a success?
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline dpen

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #40 on: July 07, 2008, 09:57:25 AM »
nah, the condition of the crank proved the theory (compared to others I've seen as these motors didn't have an oil filter)
  the blow up was completely unrelated

Offline joecool14u2

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #41 on: July 07, 2008, 11:17:13 AM »
well the transmission shop has a way of flushing automatic transmissions till the fluid runs clean, can you accomplish this with a engine, this would surely help??? or would it? does engine parts wear to a uniformity in place and last longer if left undisturbed, and just let what oil gets there get there and let be? there has to be some wear for sure, just how much is safe to offset it? does not the engine need bottom end done when top end is done to make sure the bearings on crank are up to par to the new compression levels of pistons, does not the bearings wear to the amount on each point, altering the point of wear increases the wear cycle? i can't help but believe that whatever we do the life of the engine is doomed to wear, and snake oil and engine flush may or may not help, the right oil or wrong oil hot oil change or cold oil change, in the end you are wearing the engine out, one may argue that keeping it clean in there allows more circulation, but also may wear the internals by hydraulics, 70psi is a lot of pressure and great circulation and oil chop and low film resistance, wrong oil formula from what engine designed, wrong gas formula, riding habits and condition variables, so much leaves us confused, and there is no test the big companies can do to say this is best, in one day i ride from 5:00am 50degrees sitting still to nearly 95-100 degrees at 3:00pm then it rains on me at 6:00pm, so the engine i am sure suffered greatly different operating temperatures, drastically  altering the properties of the oil, so to test these changing conditions and certain habits, terrains, and uses is hopeless i believe, there is no way for one way to be better than the other, you do the same things in too different climates and the same bike and same oil and totally different results, plus do you park your bike in freezing cold air after a long ride, more internal condensation, do you ride in the rain, cooling the engine not reaching 165 degrees, these things cause oil to break down and do funny things, do you park your bike inside in climate controlled garage, only ride in fair wearther, maybe less oil changing is ok, but either way, conditions tuning and habits contribute to ever changing conditions to make it impossible to tell what is best, for me i think you should adjust your thinking to what you do to your machine and maintenance it accordingly, if you depend on it and ride it every day, change the oil a lot(hot and cold), if you ride easy on weekends that are fair, change the oil once a year , if you leave the bike outside and the temperatures change drastically, change the more often, if you keep it inside the same temps always, change it less, but regardless, when you ride there is engine wear, if you ride easy, its wearing, if you ride hard its wearing, just like the tires, anything turning against something else is wearing, it will only go so far, and i dont think snake oil will change that by a lot, just tuning and consideration for your particular conditions and making the right choices of how many oil changes in a year, i'm done whew ;D

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,557
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #42 on: July 07, 2008, 12:07:08 PM »
Dude, did you do that all on one breath?

Here's what I think.  Unlike other oil threads, this one has made us think about conventional wisdom.  In the future, I will drain the oil hot preferably right from a ride.  I will let it drain for at least an hour.  Every 3rd or 4th oil change, I will reinstall the drain plug and pour some sort of solvent to try to remove the sludge.  This thought is directly from this thread and as yet, untried.  I'll let you guys know how it worked.

Joecool is right about one thing(maybe more than one).  And that is "whatever we do, the life of the engine is doomed to wear".  Think about it.  These small(compared to car) engines spin at such high revs, it's a wonder they don't just fly apart.  And inside any size engine, there are multiple explosions per second.  A thin film of oil is enough to offer "protection"?
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

eldar

  • Guest
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #43 on: July 07, 2008, 12:17:44 PM »
that is all true. So really, given the variables, will a hot change make that much of a difference? there is no way to know for sure. Engine manufacturers might say yes but then their tests are done in a lab. Not in the real world. We can all agree on 1 thing, change your oil. Thats about it.
So I submit that as long as your bike runs and suffers no oil related break downs, you are doing just fine. But I am sure someone will want to argue that too. ::)

Offline bryanj

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,973
  • CB500 Number 1000036
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #44 on: July 07, 2008, 09:54:46 PM »
OK so lets talk real engines (google Doxford)

1,000mm bore; 2,000mm combined stroke Diesel 2 stroke.

Oil is NEVER ever changed BUT at all times there is a centifugal filter running that removes ALL the water and particulates--usually even when engine not running (totaly seperate electric oil pump)

And just to throw in another one Hydraulic oil warmed to the correct temp is an absolutely perfect white metal bearing oil
Semi Geriatric ex-Honda mechanic and MOT tester (UK version of annual inspection). Garage full of "projects" mostly 500/4 from pre 73 (no road tax in UK).

Remember "Its always in the last place you look" COURSE IT IS YOU STOP LOOKIN THEN!

Offline Raul CB750K1

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,881
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #45 on: July 17, 2008, 05:26:58 AM »
Been away for vacation and wanted to see your points of view on the matter. Without intention to beat a dead horse, there are still some questions lingering on my mind.

1. If the point of changing the oil is that the tranny gears "break" the oil, how come that the car transmission have its own oil and doesn't almost have to be changed, sometimes during the car's whole life?

2. There seems to be two different opinions. One say "I change the oil because it degrades". The other say "I change the oil because, even if it doesn't degrade, it accumulates carbon deposit and metal particles that can harm the engine.

My Audi car has service intervals in excess of 18.000 miles. Sure thing, at 100 euro the gallon of oil, it is suppoused to be some kind of marvel oil, developed in some laboratory up in the International Space Station. But, what about the particles? It is suppoused to have particles, and water, and what not. If Audi says that it is OK to change the oil every 20.000 miles, it is because they know the oil will keep up and the particles won't harm the car.


Then, if the oil can't be broken by tranny gears and particles are not that bad -much more if you have an oil filter, do the sticking properties of regular oil get lost with time and use? At the end of the day, the purpose of the oil is to create a microscopic film between rubbing surfaces to avoid metal-to-metal contact. OK, it gives some cooling, but the main function is to lubricate. No oil change will avoid your timing chaing shaving chunks of aluminum if you don't tighten it, and no oil change will avoid your rings and bearings wearing off with normal use. OK, regular changes will avoid particle sediment, but if I can live with the thought of a few millimeters of sediments in my crankcase -that were hard to remove with a high pressure hose during my CB350 rebuild-, I guess I can live with longer service intervals.


You can't imagine how convenient is to change the oil in the car and know that, except a "customary" but needed 1/8 gallon -1/2 liter- refill, you are good for the next two years....  and it is 9 years and 140.000 km (almost 100.000 miles) old now. In my car I have changed the oil just four times since new.

Offline mystic_1

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,071
  • 1970 CB750K
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #46 on: July 17, 2008, 06:01:41 AM »
1. Cars (and harleys) have separate lubrication for the transmission and the engine, therefore the lube in each area is subjected to less negative influences.  The transmission lube doesn't accumulate blow-by contamination, and the engine lube does not suffer from the shearing forces in the clutch and transmission.

2. Take some old oil and rub it between your fingers.  You'll FEEL the grittiness.  You may not be able to see molecular degradation, but it's there too.  So, to my mind, these are not two differing school of thought, but rather they are two complimentary reasons to change your oil.


Comparing an air-cooled motorcycle engine with common transmission lubrication to a liquid-cooled car engine with separate lubrication is a bit like comparing apples to oranges.  Are you considering running your bike for 20,000 miles without changing the oil?  Good luck with that.

mystic_1
"A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for."
- John Augustus Shedd

My build thread:  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=68952.0

eldar

  • Guest
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2008, 06:14:40 AM »
So then what have you to say to the people who have bikes that can go 8000 miles between changes AND their motor oil also is their tranny oil?  I mean there are new jap bikes that turn higher rpms and their oil lasts longer. The oil is still subject to the supposed shearing. It is also subject to blowby and particulates.

Has anyone here actually sent their used oil to be tested? I mean isnt that the final answer? If I had the cash, I would do it. I would also be willing to bet that almost all of you change your oil TOO SOON. After all, oil only needs to be changed when it is worn out, there is no reason to change it otherwise.


Offline Gordon

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,114
  • 750K1, 550K2
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #48 on: July 17, 2008, 08:29:59 AM »
I would also be willing to bet that almost all of you change your oil TOO SOON. After all, oil only needs to be changed when it is worn out, there is no reason to change it otherwise.


How am I supposed to know exactly the point at which the oil is worn out?  I'm perfectly happy knowing that I'm changing the oil before it's worn out rather than waiting until I'm sure that it's worn out to do it. 

Offline mystic_1

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,071
  • 1970 CB750K
Re: Oil change: how much truth there is in "conventional wisdom"?
« Reply #49 on: July 17, 2008, 09:24:32 AM »
So then what have you to say to the people who have bikes that can go 8000 miles between changes AND their motor oil also is their tranny oil? 

Well now you're talking about manufacturer's recommendations, which is not the same discussion as we're having.  These recommendations are based on the engine technology and oils that are currently available.  Honda's recommendations from 38 years ago aren't necessarily accurate based on today's oils.  Again, apples and oranges.

To these people, I would say "If that's the manufacturer's recommendation than cool."

To people who say "Well I'm supposed to change the oil every X miles, but I don't think I have to", then I'll say the same thing I said above, good luck with that.

Also I agree with Gordon's position that the time to change the oil is well before it breaks down.  Can you get away with less frequent oil changes?  Maybe, but why subject your engine to that?  The few dollars you will save in teh short run would certainly be offset if you waited until the oil broke down and your engine suffered excessive wear or damage as a result.

So, if you are defining "too soon" as "before the oil has degraded to the point where the engine is suffering damage as a result" then I, too, am perfectly content with changing my oil "too soon".  Far better than changing it "too late".


mystic_1
"A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for."
- John Augustus Shedd

My build thread:  http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=68952.0