Author Topic: 6 must be better than 4??  (Read 5044 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 6pkrunner

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #25 on: November 03, 2005, 09:27:08 AM »
Funny thing is, like I keep saying, when the SOHC came out and I saw the turquoise one at the local dealer it was instant love. The 4 pipes were sheer nirvana along with the rest of the entire beauty. When the F came out I was shocked by the single pipe. The aftermarket Hookers and Jardines and such I could handle as they were "day two" stuff. But the factory to go to one pipe? And just to be opposite the 6 pipes on a CBX do nothing for me. I've become a factory guy for exhaust systems.
However I had to do a Kerker on my F3 as the two eGouge stock pipes that showed up were less than impressive by a wide margin.

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #26 on: November 03, 2005, 10:10:32 AM »
Quote
The 4 pipes were sheer nirvana ..

I agree. Just returned from a ride and while out there thought to myself, 4 cylinders, 4 carbs, 4 pipes, what a smooth, mellow sound.  ;)

We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline cb650

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,864
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #27 on: November 03, 2005, 02:38:45 PM »
Been meanin to post that over the summer saw 5 nice cbx's.  Couple really nice (not gowdy) "customs".  A couple old striped wings too.



                             Terry
18 grand and 18 miles dont make you a biker

Jim Shea

  • Guest
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #28 on: November 08, 2005, 07:40:08 AM »
This one went for 1800 pounds, what a buy and I bottled it and didn't bid!! although putting 6 pipes on would cost a bundle?
Have a look at the swinging arm, why would someone do this?
Jim.

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,553
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #29 on: November 08, 2005, 07:46:24 AM »
Jim. The original CBX handled as well as you would expect a massive engine in a 70's frame to.  8)

Why has your F1 got Hagon shocks - same answer I'm afraid!

6-6 in stainless would cost you another 1800 (there was a guy in Classic MCM a while back who did just that)
SOHC4 Member #2393
2015 Tiger 800 XRT
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)

Offline Bodi

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,701
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #30 on: November 08, 2005, 08:25:53 AM »
There's a bunch of vintage Japanese bike fans living west of Toronto that get together for coffee in Belfountain. Last time I went there were 4 mint CBXs in the lot, 2 GL1000s, and a nice CB1100.
A Toronto area racer (Frank Mrazec) tried to campaign a CBX. I rode a lap at Mosport on it and even with a lot of stiffening and suspension work - plus whatever could be spared taken off - it was too heavy, too flexible, and was a handful (plus maybe an underwear full) to get around the corners even at my way-slow speed. Possibly Frank's theory was that if he got ahead on the hole shot nobody would be crazy enough to try and pass him as it hogged through the turns? It sure sounded wild with the race pipes though.

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,553
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Re: 6 must be better than 4??
« Reply #31 on: November 08, 2005, 08:29:46 AM »
There were a bunch of crazy Europeans who tried special frames for road and track. Sometimes you see them mentioned:

Moto Martin
Harris
Bimota (?)

.. bit radical though just to make it go round corners.
SOHC4 Member #2393
2015 Tiger 800 XRT
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)