« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Water bridge thought problem  (Read 1089 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sangyo soichiro

  • Tuck
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,167
  • ☢ the atomic playboy ☠
Water bridge thought problem
« on: July 17, 2009, 11:51:03 AM »
I was emailed this and thought I'd share it.  It's a nice little physics problem.

This was the question in the email:

Question:
Did this bridge have to be designed to withstand the additional weight of ship and barge traffic,
or just the weight of the water?




Something to think about....    ;)  :)
Logged
1974 CB 750
1972 CB 750 http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,57974.0.html
1971 CL 350 Scrambler
1966 Black Bomber
Too many others to name…
My cross country trip: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,138625.0.html

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2009, 12:01:18 PM »
Hmm, reminds me of a plane taking off on a conveyor belt.  ;D

P.S. I say both.
Logged
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2009, 12:06:24 PM »
depends on whether the boats were already in the body of water that is used in the water bridge. If so, the boats displaced the water by the amount of weight already.
Adding the boats later adds weight overall to the entire body of water.
So the bridge has to be designed for the overall weight of both water and ships. Not to mention the weight of the bridge itself :)
Logged
No.

Offline my78k

  • I am Meat-O of the Hungry Horses MC
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,839
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2009, 12:08:33 PM »
and all those people just wandering along...damn don't they have jobs?

Dennis
Logged

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2009, 12:09:24 PM »
I guess what I should say, is that the ship in the middle of the bridge ads no more weight than if it wasn't there.
Logged
No.

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2009, 12:17:31 PM »
Anyone know if the bridge is 'locked' at both ends? It would make a difference in the answer I think. If locked, it would have to be at both ends, duh.
Logged
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2009, 12:21:49 PM »
Quote from: Bob Wessner on July 17, 2009, 12:17:31 PM
Anyone know if the bridge is 'locked' at both ends? It would make a difference in the answer I think. If locked, it would have to be at both ends, duh.
If the boat was already between the locked ends, no matter how far apart the locked ends were, the weight would be the same. Even if the 'locked ends' were the ocean on one side, and a giant lake on the other.
Logged
No.

Offline UnCrash

  • Pass
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,705
    • My Blog
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2009, 12:49:25 PM »
There is no need to calculate the weight of the boats because they in fact weigh as much as the water they displaced.

All the engineers need to do is calculate mean water height for the "bridge" to derive the total load that the bridge needs to support regardless of how much boat traffic is on it.

Now if a boat sinks and no longer displaces water equal to its weight there's a problem.
Logged
You can't make too much popcorn, but you can definately eat too much popcorn.

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2009, 12:52:04 PM »
Quote from: mlinder on July 17, 2009, 12:21:49 PM
Quote from: Bob Wessner on July 17, 2009, 12:17:31 PM
Anyone know if the bridge is 'locked' at both ends? It would make a difference in the answer I think. If locked, it would have to be at both ends, duh.
If the boat was already between the locked ends, no matter how far apart the locked ends were, the weight would be the same. Even if the 'locked ends' were the ocean on one side, and a giant lake on the other.

What if the lock positions were roughly the ends of the bridge? Wouldn't the displaced water still have to be accommodated by the structure?
Logged
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline Duke McDukiedook

  • Space Force 6 Star General
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,688
  • Wish? Did somebody say wish?
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2009, 12:56:28 PM »
I think the boats would be considered live loads just like traffic on a regular bridge.

But like you said the boats would just displace their equal buoyant weight in water.

This is why I'm not a structural engineer.

Good thought question.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2009, 01:12:02 PM by Dukiedook »
Logged
"Well, Mr. Carpetbagger. We got somethin' in this territory called the Missouri boat ride."   Josey Wales

"It's Baltimore, gentlemen. The gods will not save you." Ervin Burrell

CB750 K3 crat | (2) 1986 VFR750F

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2009, 01:05:01 PM »
Quote from: Bob Wessner on July 17, 2009, 12:52:04 PM
Quote from: mlinder on July 17, 2009, 12:21:49 PM
Quote from: Bob Wessner on July 17, 2009, 12:17:31 PM
Anyone know if the bridge is 'locked' at both ends? It would make a difference in the answer I think. If locked, it would have to be at both ends, duh.
If the boat was already between the locked ends, no matter how far apart the locked ends were, the weight would be the same. Even if the 'locked ends' were the ocean on one side, and a giant lake on the other.

What if the lock positions were roughly the ends of the bridge? Wouldn't the displaced water still have to be accommodated by the structure?

Well, I figure, the lock would have to open to allow the boat in. Means the lock is open. As the boat moves in, the difference between the volume of water that the boat replaces would move outisde the lock as the boat moved in, so no, no difference.
Logged
No.

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2009, 01:25:46 PM »
Good point.
Logged
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline medic09

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,666
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #12 on: July 17, 2009, 02:03:17 PM »
Of course, I wanted to know if it really exists.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/architecture/waterbridge.asp

Pretty cool!
Logged
Mordechai

'78 CB750K
'76 Triumph T160 Trident (rebuilding)
'07 aprilia Caponord

Santa Fe, NM

Offline tramp

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,142
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2009, 04:08:51 PM »
boats are weighed by the amount of water they displaced
so i would say the bridge would just have to support the water
Logged
1974 750k

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2009, 04:19:28 PM »
Quote from: tramp on July 17, 2009, 04:08:51 PM
boats are weighed by the amount of water they displaced
so i would say the bridge would just have to support the water

That's true, but the overall weight of the water in the 'container' increases as much as the boat weighs. It's a matter of percentages. A boat that weighs 600 tons in 6 million tons of water still makes the whole bit weigh 6,000,600 tons. It's just that the amount of weight is spread out all over the entire contact area of water to container, not just directly below it. I don't know the speed of that equalization, and obviously, it's not instantaneous, so a boat moving through that waterway will cause more weight at that moment, where it's located, but it does eventually equalize out.
Logged
No.

Offline lynchj

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 213
  • Life is short ...go for a ride now
Re: Water bridge thought problem
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2009, 04:23:17 PM »
Quote from: tramp on July 17, 2009, 04:08:51 PM
boats are weighed by the amount of water they displaced
so i would say the bridge would just have to support the water

Don't forget all those unemployed people walking on it.
Logged
my CB500 build thread   http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=54143.0

Other toys: 98 YZ125, 70 MGB, 99 Camaro
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »