Author Topic: Power to Weight Ratios  (Read 4823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,561
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Power to Weight Ratios
« on: November 30, 2005, 07:27:10 AM »
This was an aside in another thread, but wondered if anyone would like to add to this?

750 = 500lbs and 67bhp = 295bhp/tonne

550 = 400lbs and 50bhp = 275bhp/tonne

500 = 400lbs and 48bhp = 264bhp/tonne

Fireblade (2006) = 165kg (363lbs) and 161bhp = 978bhp/tonne  8)


Please feel free to add other models (350 / 400 / 650) and variants.  Did the K's weigh more than the F's?
« Last Edit: November 30, 2005, 07:43:41 AM by SteveD CB500F »
SOHC4 Member #2393
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)
All modern bikes now gone...

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2005, 09:28:01 AM »
Quote
Did the K's weigh more than the F's?

I would have thought so, but just looked up the specs on an 750 F3 vs K8 and the K8 is lighter 5 lbs.
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

MetalHead550

  • Guest
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2005, 12:11:35 PM »
Hey Steve whats the formula?  And what the hell is a tonne?  English for ton(2kpounds) ;D?

Offline Gordon

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,114
  • 750K1, 550K2
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2005, 12:40:31 PM »
You can find the power to weight ratio by dividing the horsepower by the weight.  The higher the number, the more power it has overall. 

CB750 = 0.134

CB550 = 0.125

CB500 = 0.120

This is on par with some of the fastest performance cars, but what's interesting is what happens when you figure in the weight of the rider. 
With 180 pounds added on:

CB750 = 0.099

CB550 = 0.086

CB500 = 0.083

Hardley any difference between 500 and 550, but much larger difference between 550 and 750. 

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,561
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2005, 02:03:06 PM »
1 tonne = 1000kg

I can figure the lbs/kgs bit but not the old tons which we haven't used here since I was in primary school (you'd probably call it 1st grade?)

I think Gordon is using the more recent measurement which is a true ratio of kw/kg

The Fireblade I mentioned earlier was 0.758.   Compare that with the CB figures!
That is 125kW for 165kg

For the purposes of this calculation I used 1 bhp = 750W or 0.75kW
SOHC4 Member #2393
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)
All modern bikes now gone...

Offline Gordon

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,114
  • 750K1, 550K2
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2005, 08:12:33 AM »
CB400 = 0.099      w/rider = 0.067

CB350 = 0.086      w/rider = 0.058

Offline needswork

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2005, 09:05:54 AM »
H-D XL 883 Sportster

675lbs (dry, claimed by manufacturer) and 45 hp (claimed by an owner) = 0.06   or 150 hp/tonne ::)

H-D doesn't give hp ratings on any of their models except for the V-Rod.

hehe, my car:
'98 Volvo S70 T-5
1427.9 kg and 236 hp = 165.2 hp/tonne  :)
« Last Edit: December 01, 2005, 09:49:34 AM by needswork »
'78 CB 550K fixer-upper. The bike needs work, I sure don't!

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,561
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2005, 09:51:23 AM »
I like the bhp/tonne better too.

My Jag:  1650Kg 240bhp = 145bhp/tonne
SOHC4 Member #2393
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)
All modern bikes now gone...

Offline needswork

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2005, 09:58:32 AM »
in my HUMBLE opinion though, horsepower is over-rated while torque is under-rated. Torque is the "seat-of-the-pants" feel.  Know what I mean?
'78 CB 550K fixer-upper. The bike needs work, I sure don't!

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,561
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2005, 10:02:48 AM »
I do know what you mean.  Unfortunately "Honda 4" and "torque" seem to be mutually exclusive !

Seriously - I couldn't tell you what torque figure was available on my bikes. I do know that I rode my neighbours 1450 HD round town in 5th gear and only changed once for a red light!

My Jag is a short-stroke V8 (3.2) and is a bit low on the old torque as well (it's red lined at 7.5k though)

There was an article in Classic & Motorcycle Mechanics a few months ago about diesel bikes apparently they have so much torque that they can out drag a modern crotch rocket up to 60 or 70 (which is probably all you ever need for zooming around town)
SOHC4 Member #2393
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)
All modern bikes now gone...

Offline needswork

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2005, 10:10:43 AM »
"Unfortunately "Honda 4" and "torque" seem to be mutually exclusive"

Yeah, that's (sadly) true, my 550 is rated something like 27 ft/lb. I drove a friend HD (1300 cc?) and it had great torque.

Deisel bikes! I never knew such a thing existed. The torque would be great but I probably couldn't get past the rattly noise and smell.  :-\
'78 CB 550K fixer-upper. The bike needs work, I sure don't!

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,575
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2005, 03:55:31 PM »
yep,torque is what moves ya
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

gaijin

  • Guest
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2005, 07:14:48 PM »
Yeah, diesel bikes are pretty cool. My buddy has a nice motard that he converted to run on biodiesel as well as normal diesel. Runs like a champ.

I remember hearing something about a new diesel sportbike prototype, wonder if google can find it..

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2005, 02:11:51 AM »
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline SteveD CB500F

  • Global Moderator
  • Old Timer
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,561
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • TVAM
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2005, 03:44:56 AM »
165 ft lbs of torque (let alone 250!) sounds like serious 30-70 mph acceleration.

Compare with 27 ft lbs on the 550 and 33(?) for the 750
SOHC4 Member #2393
1971 CB500K0 (US Model)
All modern bikes now gone...

Offline needswork

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2005, 06:08:49 AM »
hehe, pull yer arms off.  :D
'78 CB 550K fixer-upper. The bike needs work, I sure don't!

Jim Shea

  • Guest
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2005, 08:51:50 AM »
Torque, shmorque. My bike pulls in 5th from 30-40 mph no problem..

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,575
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2005, 09:13:13 AM »
damn jim,dont be afraid to speak your mind
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Jim Shea

  • Guest
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2005, 10:32:11 AM »
I do speak my mind, trouble is I am normally thinking bollocks, so that's what I end up talking!  ;)

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,575
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2005, 10:49:44 AM »
uh huh
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Jim Shea

  • Guest
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2005, 11:21:24 AM »
Mark,
You have the dubious honour of receiving my 500th post, does that make me an old timer now??
Jim.

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,575
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #21 on: December 02, 2005, 12:25:03 PM »
yea,ur and old timer.....lol and thank you for the honor
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

MetalHead550

  • Guest
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #22 on: December 02, 2005, 12:50:06 PM »
Anybody read that article in Bobs link about the V8 they made by grafting two hyabusa engines together?  Using it in cars, makes 375hp and revs over 10k!  Crazy stuff, it must sound glorious to hear a v8 reving that high.  Which reminds me,  I saw an old in-line 4 Excelsior that a guy had made into an 8 cylinder at a swap meet in Iowa this past summer.   Talk about cool, mabey I can find a link.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2005, 01:23:34 PM by MetalHead550 »

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,575
Re: Power to Weight Ratios
« Reply #23 on: December 02, 2005, 01:45:03 PM »
id like to see the link about the busa
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Offline Einyodeler

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,029
  • Midnight bugs taste best!!!
« Last Edit: December 02, 2005, 02:45:43 PM by Einyodeler »
1972 CB500 - 1973 CB500 - 1974 CB550K - 1975 CB550F - 1975 CB750F - 1976 CJ360 - 1983 CR480 - 1970 BSA A65T Thunderbolt



Download Motorcycle Shop Manuals here: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=17788.0