Author Topic: porting questions  (Read 2655 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline the technological J

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,490
  • deliciouso!
porting questions
« on: October 04, 2009, 09:52:11 AM »
ive been reading lots of stuff on here and i here many people talk about porting and first level porting can anyone explain to me what porting is  and have any pics? hondamans famous thoughts talk about pocket ports... im confusted as what this is and how exact does porting have to be? is this done by touch or is this an exact science?
70 KO...sold to fund the ST http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=88800.0(Alpha)
74 Kaw 250 Enduro http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=124278.0
K4 added to collection! http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=104784.0
78 750K... http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=60257.0 (Omega)sold to fund the K4
94 ST1100..Gone
72 750 K2 Stay tuned!

Online Don R

  • My Sandcast is a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 19,942
  • Saver of unloved motorcycles.
Re: porting questions
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2009, 12:12:34 PM »
Porting is opening up the intake and exhaust ports by grinding and sanding.  As much art as science. Many automotive race heads are done by cnc machines these days, it is more precise and a good port can be duplicated over and over where hand porting is hard to duplicate. Pocket porting is just porting a specific area, I believe in the valve bowl. Too bad there is not a cnc program for us 750 guys. Yet.
No matter how many times you paint over a shadow, it's still there.
 CEO at the no kill motorcycle shop.
 You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.

Hinomaru

  • Guest
Re: porting questions
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2009, 12:32:33 PM »

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,812
  • bike in a box
Re: porting questions
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2010, 07:14:26 PM »
Kind of not a a 750 and in fact it's not even got a cam, but there may be something you can learn about similar tools and techinques on a two stroke  here (lots of pics):
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline wannabridin

  • Patience made me a
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,237
  • -Garrett
    • 1976 CB750K, under construction:
Re: porting questions
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2010, 07:29:45 PM »
Kind of not a a 750 and in fact it's not even got a cam, but there may be something you can learn about similar tools and techinques on a two stroke  here (lots of pics):

forget the link poor boi??
1976 CB750K, currently under construction:
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=64468.0

-And if you don't do it this year, you'll be one year older when you do...

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,812
  • bike in a box
Re: porting questions
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2010, 07:34:03 PM »
Asleep at the wheel and BCS football..

http://www.teamsmoke.com/photo5_1.html

Several page #'s across the top link up to porting pics..
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline RRRToolSolutions

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,167
  • I love old Japanese bikes!
Re: porting questions
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2010, 07:39:28 PM »
That old Branch flow-bench test Hinomaru posted above is some great information. Times have changed and while the article is clearly 35 years old or more - the test themselves illustrate the benefits perfectly.

Porting is not something you just do. Flow improvement is the key and just bigger doesn't mean more flow. You can actually slow/ruin a head if the shaping and sizing is not kept in concert. Mine was done with a Flowbench, but many good porters (Mike here) have done these so much - they know.

Here is an 836cc kitted bike that I've purposely twisted to 11,000 rpm (well past peak) just to make some noise for my camera. You can count the seconds involved - I pinned her throttle to the 120 mark. It's faster than my 1976 KZ900 fresh motored bike.

Porting is money well spent and does not cost reliability 1 bit -

Gordon

http://www.vholdr.com/node/49293
Kaws, Hondas, Yamahas, and Suzukis - especially Kaws

Offline Flying J

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,386
Re: porting questions
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2010, 09:30:54 AM »
I am doing a port job and I'm not using a flow bench. As stated above removing to much material or doing it un evenly can ruin your head. But what you can do your self is smooth and match the ports. That means removing the rough spots and casting marks and matching the intake and head surface to reduce unwanted friction. I am no expert but i believe this can be done with positive results without using a flow bench. I have ported/matched my head and it is awaiting a valve job. Then i will see how things turned out. If you look at the before and after pics in my thread you can see the casting removed.
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=56904.msg614354#msg614354

Offline dave500

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,019
  • WHAT?no gravy?
Re: porting questions
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2010, 01:04:36 PM »
the two stroke porting is a different kettle of fish in that it changes the event timing of fuel inlet and exhaust,a bit like a modified cam in a four stroke.

Offline sparty

  • I just play one on TV
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,788
  • My engine is 100% stock... wink.
    • Gallery
Re: porting questions
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2010, 02:20:24 PM »
That old Branch flow-bench test Hinomaru posted above is some great information. Times have changed and while the article is clearly 35 years old or more - the test themselves illustrate the benefits perfectly.

Porting is not something you just do. Flow improvement is the key and just bigger doesn't mean more flow. You can actually slow/ruin a head if the shaping and sizing is not kept in concert. Mine was done with a Flowbench, but many good porters (Mike here) have done these so much - they know.

Here is an 836cc kitted bike that I've purposely twisted to 11,000 rpm (well past peak) just to make some noise for my camera. You can count the seconds involved - I pinned her throttle to the 120 mark. It's faster than my 1976 KZ900 fresh motored bike.

Porting is money well spent and does not cost reliability 1 bit -

Gordon

http://www.vholdr.com/node/49293


Gordon,

I love that video.  Just a bit under 12 seconds from a rolling start to 120 mph. 

Art
1972 CB750 K2 Cafe' Style




GO AWAY SNOW AND COLD!  Can you see the Hot Rod wants to run...
“That's thirty minutes away. I'll be there in ten.”

larrycavan

  • Guest
Re: porting questions
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2010, 07:07:46 PM »
Hi Guys,

My first post on this forum. I've been browsing the porting threads for a little while. Some good info and some not so good info in them.

Here's a video of  testing a cylinderhead for velocity. In the video you'll see the actual speed through the port in feet per second at 28" of test pressure. In addition to the CFM [cubic feet per minute] numbers, the velocity is even more important.

It can be measured and the information put to good use. The amount of flow the head is capable of is one thing but if the cross sectionl area of the port is incorrect for the size of the motor and the intended peak horsepower RPM, then the combination won't always work properly.

In the video, you'll see  a port being probed with a J Bend pitot. In the computer screen shots, the number in the upper right is the air speed.

Sorry, it's not a Honda head but it's all the same relevance.


http://www.flowbenchtech.com/porting/CRH/velocitytest.htm