well i wont lie,... am i an expert... no. thats just my opinion from my experience. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce189/ce1898dd348de648de5ea5a6941d1bdd6abe3558" alt="Tongue :P"
Don't feel bad. The original question simply begged for unsupportable conjecture and vague, meaningless testimonials. You just took the bait.
Since both Edelbrock/Carter and Holley/clone carbs have been used successfully on thousands (millions) of vehicles, by what metric do you decide if one is better than the other, without even a cursory glance at application, or the application required parameters?
The thread at the outset reminded me of the school yard kids poking at a dog pile, just to see the flies get agitated and buzz around wildly. You can expect the same level of "conclusive, scientific test results" here, I imagine.
So which is best? Coke or Pepsi? ... A broken right finger or a broken left finger?
Ford or Chevy.
Mopar or Mack?
John Deer or Caterpillar?
Honda or Toyota?
Betty Crocker or Pilsbury?
Trojan or Paradise?
Consumer brand loyalty is really a very stupid concept. As none of your favorite "trusted" brands have any loyalty to their customer base, and will change their product at the whim of increased profits, even if it means a different selection set of "customers". (Yup, my old 84 Toyota was a really reliable car without accelerator problems. My even older 55 Chevy was a great car. My 89 Chev Camaro is a piece of engineered Sh!T.) Do you think any brand will change back to the old product or product recipe/process to satisfy 100 old customers rather than sell to 10,000 new customers (plus the old ones who can't tell the difference)?
Sigh...
I may have said too much...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/789af/789af24d24d21526733316c2d2488457a0a11d0a" alt="Lips sealed :-X"
Maybe that dog pile is safe to land on again?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1533f/1533f68a063596772097a69ebe28b722c35ffda6" alt="Grin ;D"