Author Topic: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]  (Read 66016 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline michrobi

  • Goldenrod blew a 5" hole out the front with a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • On a neverending quest for more garage space
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #175 on: September 11, 2010, 12:43:42 PM »
Got the cases put together, assembled the rotor, gave it a little turn, but no turn. Gave it some more torque, nothin...

At 20 lbs. on the mains the crank is clamped. At about 17.5 lbs. it turns normally. I plastigauged those bearings dry with stock main bolts at 16.5 lbs. and got .0015" across the board. Now it seems like the black bearings are too big.

That pretty much blows.
-Mike

'78 CB750F All stock except for the powerplant. Jived it off my Dad in the spring of '94. He had it since 1980 and it's the first bike I ever rode on.

Current project: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=67756

How's them SOHC4 patches coming?

Offline Jerry Rxman Griffin aka MuthaF'er

  • This MuthaF'er is getting to be a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,934
  • Bought her new 4/75
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #176 on: September 11, 2010, 03:02:08 PM »
Yeah, that really bites!

I matched up the original letter readings then I took my digital calipers to my crank and used the chart. Both said green so I kept my fingers crossed. Torqued it to 22lb with Plastigauge. I got your readings, .0015, all across too. I figured that's at the top end of the range so it should be OK. Spins freely. I'm only going to have a few days to work on it the next month or so. You'll be done by the time I get started again! You haven't missed something else like a binding cam chain, tranny, etc have you??

 
As of today 3/13/2012 my original owner 75 CB750F has made it through 3 wives, er EX-wives. Free at last.  ;-)

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #177 on: September 11, 2010, 03:08:52 PM »
Wow M & J. I wouldn't have thought the extra torque would continue clamping smaller. Just tighter. Guess we're learning. I'm looking to button mine up soon.

I did the stock bolts at 16.5 got .0015 with 3 greens and 2 browns. I'll be putting in the HD studs and clamping a little tighter for final assembly. Stand by...
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

a700guy

  • Guest
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #178 on: September 11, 2010, 06:11:54 PM »
When we build some heads, exceeding the specified torque would not only bind the cam in the machined carrier but also completely reduce the lash (bucket and shim).

I would be curious if one was to torque an empty set of cases and measure the mainbearing bores with a boregauge if it is even still round at the exceeded values.

I have seen many many cams and carriers smoked from not using a torque wrench, which always means they exceeded specified torque 14nm usually 18+.

as little as 16nm has been seen to distort the bore enough to feel it by hand, and this is with modern f1 quality alloys and they have centering dowels at every bolt hole also.

Just my 2 cents

Offline MRieck

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,596
  • Big ideas....
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #179 on: September 11, 2010, 07:35:07 PM »
When we build some heads, exceeding the specified torque would not only bind the cam in the machined carrier but also completely reduce the lash (bucket and shim).

I would be curious if one was to torque an empty set of cases and measure the mainbearing bores with a boregauge if it is even still round at the exceeded values.

I have seen many many cams and carriers smoked from not using a torque wrench, which always means they exceeded specified torque 14nm usually 18+.

as little as 16nm has been seen to distort the bore enough to feel it by hand, and this is with modern f1 quality alloys and they have centering dowels at every bolt hole also.

Just my 2 cents
Honestly...it's Chicken sh$t here with torque values. Clamping values are so low. We are talking 6 and 8mm fasteners.
Owner of the "Million Dollar CB"

Offline Jerry Rxman Griffin aka MuthaF'er

  • This MuthaF'er is getting to be a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,934
  • Bought her new 4/75
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #180 on: September 11, 2010, 08:40:31 PM »
It'd be kinda dumb to exceed the specified torque values. I'd worry more about breaking the bolts or stripping the threads. I was concerned using 10lb on the 6mm case bolts.

Keep in mind here that the torque value for the heavy duty studs is 20-22lb.

Does anyone have a value for the 6mm bolts? The manual just says "torque them"
As of today 3/13/2012 my original owner 75 CB750F has made it through 3 wives, er EX-wives. Free at last.  ;-)

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #181 on: September 11, 2010, 08:43:12 PM »
Jerry:
Scroll down for generic torque recommendations.

http://www.salocal.com/sohc/tech/torquetable.htm
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline MRieck

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,596
  • Big ideas....
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #182 on: September 11, 2010, 08:59:29 PM »
It'd be kinda dumb to exceed the specified torque values. I'd worry more about breaking the bolts or stripping the threads. I was concerned using 10lb on the 6mm case bolts.

Keep in mind here that the torque value for the heavy duty studs is 20-22lb.

Does anyone have a value for the 6mm bolts? The manual just says "torque them"
By feel Jerry. Trust me.
Owner of the "Million Dollar CB"

Offline Jerry Rxman Griffin aka MuthaF'er

  • This MuthaF'er is getting to be a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,934
  • Bought her new 4/75
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #183 on: September 11, 2010, 10:41:59 PM »
Know what you mean Mike. I worked a couple up toward 10 but quit just shy when it just wasn't feeling right! I've felt them strip and snap. That feels worse. 
As of today 3/13/2012 my original owner 75 CB750F has made it through 3 wives, er EX-wives. Free at last.  ;-)

Offline BLUE71TURBO

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,849
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #184 on: September 11, 2010, 11:19:31 PM »
  Ya Jerry, there's nothing worse than stripping and then snapping your nut on yer bolt !!!    :o :o  ::)   :D :D
Remember; Before you can be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid !

a700guy

  • Guest
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #185 on: September 11, 2010, 11:32:53 PM »
My bad, I thought you guys were saying that you were torquing tighter than oem values because you were using studs.

a700guy

  • Guest
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #186 on: September 11, 2010, 11:43:41 PM »
It'd be kinda dumb to exceed the specified torque values. I'd worry more about breaking the bolts or stripping the threads. I was concerned using 10lb on the 6mm case bolts.

Keep in mind here that the torque value for the heavy duty studs is 20-22lb.

Does anyone have a value for the 6mm bolts? The manual just says "torque them"

Specified torque is 16-18ft lbs in the manual, 22 is 4 ft-lbs over that. In my experiance torquing something over the range is was machined at usually leads to an un-round hole was all I meant.

I have a bore gauge, after I get my studs and all parts clean I will measure them at both settings and report back, it may be a while though.

Offline michrobi

  • Goldenrod blew a 5" hole out the front with a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • On a neverending quest for more garage space
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #187 on: September 12, 2010, 12:45:22 AM »
Even at 17.5 lbs. it's tighter than it should be, and that's within Honda spec range. I'm pretty sure I have too big of bearings in there. Starting to wonder if plastigauge isn't a bunch of BS. I have yet to hear of anyone getting a reading other than .0015 with any bearing.
-Mike

'78 CB750F All stock except for the powerplant. Jived it off my Dad in the spring of '94. He had it since 1980 and it's the first bike I ever rode on.

Current project: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=67756

How's them SOHC4 patches coming?

Offline voxonda

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,231
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #188 on: September 12, 2010, 03:31:21 AM »
We ruined a very nice, lightened, crank by using plastigauge. Never ever use it again. If crank has not been regrinded on the mains, it's almost always the Green bearings. We used the Black also back then. Now I always check by just measuring and compare with the Honda spec's. Never had any problems, so far, again.

Rob
Better sorry for failing then for the lack of trying.

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #189 on: September 12, 2010, 04:52:57 AM »
Even at 17.5 lbs. it's tighter than it should be, and that's within Honda spec range. I'm pretty sure I have too big of bearings in there. Starting to wonder if plastigauge isn't a bunch of BS. I have yet to hear of anyone getting a reading other than .0015 with any bearing.
I started with 5 green, had to switch to 3 green 2 browns to get the right readings straight across.
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline voxonda

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,231
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #190 on: September 12, 2010, 06:39:34 AM »
The earlier cases have more of a mismatch of bores. The later cases are more equally bored. Just look at the codes on the cases.
Better sorry for failing then for the lack of trying.

Offline Jerry Rxman Griffin aka MuthaF'er

  • This MuthaF'er is getting to be a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,934
  • Bought her new 4/75
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #191 on: September 12, 2010, 08:55:30 AM »
Good point. 75 750F cases with all B's and 78 crank with all A's.
As of today 3/13/2012 my original owner 75 CB750F has made it through 3 wives, er EX-wives. Free at last.  ;-)

Offline 754

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,058
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #192 on: September 12, 2010, 06:40:24 PM »
Maybe recheck to make sure everything is clean, and nothing is dragging.. A human hair is thicker than the clearance, and could probably prevent it from turning..
Maker of the WELDLESS 750 Frame Kit
dodogas99@gmail.com
Kelowna B.C.       Canada

My next bike will be a ..ANFOB.....

It's All part of the ADVENTURE...

73 836cc.. Green, had it for 3 decades!!
Lost quite a few CB 750's along the way

Offline michrobi

  • Goldenrod blew a 5" hole out the front with a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • On a neverending quest for more garage space
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #193 on: September 12, 2010, 06:54:00 PM »
I completely cleaned the journals and bearings, then re-oiled and reproduced the same result three different times. Loosening the main studs from the clamped 20 lbs. to 17.5 lbs. or below releases the crank and the motor all turns normally. New bearings are ordered and will hopefully be here in less than the two weeks my bolts took.
-Mike

'78 CB750F All stock except for the powerplant. Jived it off my Dad in the spring of '94. He had it since 1980 and it's the first bike I ever rode on.

Current project: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=67756

How's them SOHC4 patches coming?

a700guy

  • Guest
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #194 on: September 12, 2010, 07:56:08 PM »
are the bearings worn or shiny at the halve ends?

Offline michrobi

  • Goldenrod blew a 5" hole out the front with a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • On a neverending quest for more garage space
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #195 on: September 12, 2010, 10:41:52 PM »
Nope, every bearing is brand new. Read the thread man it aint that long yet  ;)
-Mike

'78 CB750F All stock except for the powerplant. Jived it off my Dad in the spring of '94. He had it since 1980 and it's the first bike I ever rode on.

Current project: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=67756

How's them SOHC4 patches coming?

Offline BLUE71TURBO

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,849
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #196 on: September 13, 2010, 12:13:35 AM »
 A little touchy are we ?   Sounds like the snake bit ya !   :(   Just take yer time and be patient.  It'll work out.
Remember; Before you can be old and wise, you must first be young and stupid !

Offline michrobi

  • Goldenrod blew a 5" hole out the front with a
  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • On a neverending quest for more garage space
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #197 on: September 13, 2010, 10:11:35 AM »
I know I know. I'm trying to take it in stride. Sorry for being snappy  :-[
-Mike

'78 CB750F All stock except for the powerplant. Jived it off my Dad in the spring of '94. He had it since 1980 and it's the first bike I ever rode on.

Current project: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=67756

How's them SOHC4 patches coming?

a700guy

  • Guest
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #198 on: September 13, 2010, 02:36:33 PM »
Nope, every bearing is brand new. Read the thread man it aint that long yet  ;)

I meant now...from turning the crank, can you see anything different from the majority of the bearing face. ???

Depending where has a different meaning if you can see it is all. Maybe you haven't turned it enough to shine up a spot..in which case, cool.

I was just wondering so I could possably help with why you have that particular "shiny spot" ;)




Offline tweakin

  • tear down
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,955
Re: CB750 890cc Engine build [Codename: Rattlesnake]
« Reply #199 on: September 13, 2010, 04:05:52 PM »
Mike, sounds like I can hold on to the carb sync tool a bit longer..... J/K

that blows, if you need a hand just let me know.