« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T  (Read 1989 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NickC

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 703
Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« on: March 26, 2010, 11:50:20 AM »
Anyone got the good/bad on them? Parts availability, etc? I was thinking about picking one up for my wife but I didnt want it to be a money pit.  :D
Logged

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2010, 11:57:06 AM »
a poor replacement for the 350t. Lost everything good about the 350, and gained weight.

PJ makes some interesting ones, though..
Logged
No.

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,812
  • bike in a box
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2010, 02:58:42 PM »
I looked  into getting  a 360 and probably wil, but since it's inside a garage I  figure  let him store it until  I'm ready to take on another bike.

The  plus  is that  it is a six speed.

The difference  is that the pistons on the 350f hit TDC simultaneous, and valve and spark determine which is firing (lost  spark system).  The 360 is on TDC alternating between pistons at TDC.  The 350 has a tubular fame, the 360 is unitized, and some say not as stiff.
The 360 does not get as good gas mileage.

By the time the 360 twin was out eveybody was tuning their 350's so there are many after market upgrades, the 360 not so. Everyone just kept to what they had, the 350's, instead of buying into the more engineered 360.


But if for your purpose, a bike for your wife to ride it could be good. It has the right styling compared to a ninja 250  if you are riding together. There are a fair number of parts out there for the 360.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2010, 03:03:21 PM by poor boi »
Logged
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline NickC

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 703
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2010, 03:03:43 PM »
Yeah, I'm looking to get her just a starter bike. Something fairly reliable that she can scoot around on and learn the ropes.
Logged

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2010, 03:12:36 PM »
Another big difference is that the 350 has a roller bearing bottom end. Damned near bullet proof. 360 does not.
Logged
No.

Offline camelman

  • Man... Myth... Legend
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,899
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2010, 03:13:14 PM »
The 360T would be good for her to learn on.  I had one as my first bike and loved it.  It was buzzy to ride though, and the buzziness was almost harsh at 60mph.  It is a tall bike, so make sure she can touch the ground on either side.  I think the 350 twin was a shorter bike than the 360.

I think a 350F would be an even better bike to learn on though.  Have you seen any of them around?  It is much smoother, quieter, and rides much better than my 360T did.

Camelman
Logged
1972 350f rider: sold
1972 350f/466f cafe: for sale
1977 CB400f cafe:sold
1975 CB400f rider: sold
1970 CB750 K0 complete bike: sold
2005 Triumph Sprint ST 1050 rider

We've got to cut it off... and then come down on rockets.  (quoted from: seven minutes of terror)

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,812
  • bike in a box
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2010, 03:23:26 PM »
Not  sure which has what, but I think they both have diaphragm carbs. The diaphragms are hard to get. They are worth checking, and may  be a point for price haggling.  Not sure what carbs swaps are recommened, but inavilability of diaphraghms is what  took many twins off the road.
Logged
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline cb650

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,864
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2010, 03:30:25 PM »
The 74/5 had bad cam chain tensioners.  Had them recalled but by 76 it was fixed.  I have a 76 and enjoy the hell out of it.  Been across state (2 passes over 10k) a few times and all over the front range.  Have a few pics of it in my gallery.
Logged
18 grand and 18 miles dont make you a biker

Offline NickC

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 703
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2010, 05:18:50 PM »
I guess I'll just keep an eye out then. A 350/4 is my first choice, but I haven't seen any come up in my area (within my price range).
Logged

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2010, 05:37:38 PM »
How tall is she? What's her inseam?
Logged
No.

Offline NickC

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 703
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2010, 05:53:57 PM »
Quote from: mlinder on March 26, 2010, 05:37:38 PM
How tall is she? What's her inseam?

5'11"
She fits comfortably on my 550  :D
Logged

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2010, 05:54:31 PM »
Ah, yeah, then fine.
Logged
No.

jnichols495

  • Guest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2010, 07:33:28 PM »
Quote from: mlinder on March 26, 2010, 03:12:36 PM
Another big difference is that the 350 has a roller bearing bottom end. Damned near bullet proof. 360 does not.

360's have a roller bearing crankshaft as well. . .

Logged

Offline Simpson

  • I ain't no
  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 791
  • Aged to perfection
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #13 on: March 27, 2010, 07:04:59 AM »
A 360 frame is sufficiently "stiff" enough for all types riding. The bike tends to be a tad buzzy, especially if not tuned and balanced well. Handles and tracks nicely on the road and turns very sharp due to its geometry. You can lean into corners like butter. So long you take care of the engine, it will run fine. Seat height is about 31 inches. I prefer the CB360 over the 350 due to styling, front disk brake and a six speed tran. I've hit about 92 mph on it only to be passed by jnichols495 on his 360.  ::) :P
Logged
1970 CB750 K0
1975 CL/CB 360 Mix

traveler

  • Guest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2010, 07:17:04 AM »
......it's kind of hard to beat ANY Honda twin seriously....

It would be a great bike for her...not just to learn on, but to keep.

There's enough of them...that you need to ensure it is in good condition before putting the money down, IMHO.

~Joe
Logged

Offline mlinder

  • "Kitten Puncher"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,013
  • Stop Global Tilting now!
    • Moto Northwest
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2010, 01:50:50 PM »
Quote from: jnichols495 on March 26, 2010, 07:33:28 PM
Quote from: mlinder on March 26, 2010, 03:12:36 PM
Another big difference is that the 350 has a roller bearing bottom end. Damned near bullet proof. 360 does not.

360's have a roller bearing crankshaft as well. . .



Oh, yeah, weird.. Why did I think the con rods did not have solid big ends?
Wonder what the hell I was thing of then. Some other small twin, can't remember...
Logged
No.

Offline detdrbuzzard

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2010, 04:56:07 AM »
when i started back riding a few years ago ( eleven years of not riding ) i was looking at cb350's and cb360's but decided to get a cb/cm 400/450. i found a cb450 nighthawk, 6spd trans and electronic ignition. no points or condensors
Logged
'75 cb750k, '79 cb750/9k,'84aspencade '93gl1500se, '79cb 750f '85 cb450 sc '05 sunL 70

Offline starkmojo

  • Yes I am tall...
  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 167
  • Wow that bike is Orange, but I kinda like it.
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #17 on: March 29, 2010, 08:16:40 AM »
I just talked my GF into buying a cj360T with soon to be rebuilt carbs.... so overall I am pretty happy with what I am reading.   ;D
Logged
twoold to give up
twotired to care..

Offline cb650

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,864
Re: Not a SOHC/4, but still in the family. CB360T
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2010, 04:35:10 PM »
Get some good pics of the CJ.   Many diffs to the CB/L bikes. 
Logged
18 grand and 18 miles dont make you a biker
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »