Running anyone over in your car is cowardice.
But a guy on a bike? and then drive away?
Sigh.... oh well.
Why is using a car as a weapon deemed worse than any other choice of weapon?
And what makes "being in possession of a bike" immune from any blame or "deservedness".
Since we are all well deep into speculation. What if the MC rider had just run over 12 school children and was heading toward the next school? Is running the MC driver over with a car acceptable then?
What if the car drive knew for certain that the MC driver would show up at his home later with weapons and a gang? Still not fair to take out the MCdriver with a weapon of his choice?
Why aren't lynch mobs more popular as a means of fair justice?
I think the only thing fair to say at this point in the gathering of facts, is that there was a serious lack of sound judgment by both parties. And, that the media isn't privy to, or is not relaying all the facts needed for a jury to pass reasonable judgment. The media is far more interested in relaying enough info to evoke an emotional response. Aren't they good at that?
