Guys,
I was pleased to read this topic because I have / had exactly the same question that the original poster had.
I know why race cars have a dry sump engine, but wasn't sure why the design was desireable in a motorcycle. I am always interested in the designs that were chosen and the decisions that were made by the engineers that did the work.
So, Thanks for asking the question in the first place. I, for one, learned from the experience.
I am disappointed by the expression of attitude displayed during the course of the discussion. 
Scott
Thanks for the affirmation Scott, I want to point out that it started getting choppy with the 2nd response to my question:
"You are totally unaware of CB750s. Period."
Followed up by:
Nope, just a loud proclamation of ignorance on your part.It was kinda like right outta the blue 'you're a dummy' just because I didn't know about the oil tank, kinda surprising.
It was very confrontational as in "I'm not gonna explain the oil tank I'm gonna say you're ignorant."
It was not a cool thing to do because it was confrontational. And it was wrong too. I'm not ignorant about the cb750, just parts of it. I was asking for help about something I didn't know about and in the 2nd response got called on something that is not true. All bikes have a lot in common and this bike we all love has a lot in common with all the bikes I work on: kaw triples, cb400f, kz900, kz1000, gsxr, rd400/daytona, the list go on.
Now, Scottly has very politely apologized for it, that was impressive and quite welcome. And I'm super sorry if, in defending myself as we all expect each other will to when someone gets confrontational with us, if it was a distraction. I belong to a lot of boards and when someone gets confrontational you gotta try to work it out immediately. Sorry for my tone as I stood up for myself! I did not come on the board here to be a ahole!!!!!