Author Topic: question about Pod Filters?  (Read 1812 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shane

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
question about Pod Filters?
« on: June 06, 2010, 09:53:54 PM »
I installed my pod filters and there's tube coming off the engine to the OEM air box. Well I removed the airbox, and need to know what to do with this tube... I thought I read somewhere that it re-circulates unburned fuel. Do you guys usually use a breather filter of some sort?

here's  a pic

Offline Billiam

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2010, 10:08:32 PM »
I've seen a lot of people put a breather filter on there in place of the tube.  It looks like a mini-pod filter.  They sell em at most auto parts stores.

 http://www.sfxperformance.com/parts/SPT3995.htm#
'77 CB750K

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2010, 01:27:28 AM »
The vapors that come out of the engine breather tube are carcinogens.  These vapors become less carcinogenic when burned in combustion chambers.

Any breather filter put on there simply keeps dirt and bugs outside the engine where they can be tortured and killed by the toxic vapors the engine crankcase still emits.

Cheers,
Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline shane

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2010, 10:28:49 PM »
The vapors that come out of the engine breather tube are carcinogens.  These vapors become less carcinogenic when burned in combustion chambers.

Any breather filter put on there simply keeps dirt and bugs outside the engine where they can be tortured and killed by the toxic vapors the engine crankcase still emits.

Cheers,


so are you saying no to a breather?  Another suggestion?
« Last Edit: June 08, 2010, 08:38:20 AM by shane »

Offline seaweb11

  • 1st Mate &
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,258
  • Ride & Smile
    • Playground Directory
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2010, 12:27:30 AM »
The vapors that come out of the engine breather tube are carcinogens.  These vapors become less carcinogenic when burned in combustion chambers.

Any breather filter put on there simply keeps dirt and bugs outside the engine where they can be tortured and killed by the toxic vapors the engine crankcase still emits.

Cheers,


In other words, your killing squirrels and small children ;D

Offline eurban

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,625
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2010, 04:55:10 AM »
It is a good idea to put a filter on the end of the crankcase breather hose.  The engine will draw in some unfiltered air otherwise. . . .I think that TTs comments are more aimed at your choice to remove the airbox and install pods.  Along with issues like the need for jetting changes and increased crosswind and water susceptibility the switch to pods requires loosing the airbox's feature for recombusting crankcase fumes.  Why go to the trouble for a dubious performance mod? . . . BTW, I run "pod" filters on my bike but its for looks  :). . .

Offline cgancos

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
    • Flickr Page
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2010, 05:49:53 AM »
Are you referring to the hose coming off of the cylinder head breather cover?

Offline shane

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2010, 08:37:37 AM »
Are you referring to the hose coming off of the cylinder head breather cover?

yes

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2010, 09:10:45 AM »
Are you referring to the hose coming off of the cylinder head breather cover?

yes
On the earlier pre-emmissions CB750s (69-75 or so) that hose was vented to the atmosphere. It went horizontal from the rocker box, past the carbs and curved down to a hold clip right in front of the swingarm pivot.

It did not have any form of filter or valve on it at that point, I see no reason to put one on now.

The pressure out of the engine is neutral leaning to positive. little risk of sucking anything into that tube. Many other models actually plug the tube with a removable plug. Pull the plug once in a while to remove any oil that has condensed from the vapor coming from the tube.

On race bikes, none of which I have ever seen with a stock airbox, the hose is routed to a catch can, often a small OJ can taped to a frame rail. More for appearances than anything.
Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline cameron

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 558
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2010, 12:04:30 PM »
I drilled and epoxy-ed a little nipple into the bottom of my #2 pod, and attached that hose to it. So it could recirculate like it is supposed to.
1976 CB550F

Offline eurban

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,625
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2010, 05:28:25 AM »
Are you referring to the hose coming off of the cylinder head breather cover?

yes
On the earlier pre-emmissions CB750s (69-75 or so) that hose was vented to the atmosphere. It went horizontal from the rocker box, past the carbs and curved down to a hold clip right in front of the swingarm pivot.

It did not have any form of filter or valve on it at that point, I see no reason to put one on now.

The pressure out of the engine is neutral leaning to positive. little risk of sucking anything into that tube. Many other models actually plug the tube with a removable plug. Pull the plug once in a while to remove any oil that has condensed from the vapor coming from the tube.

On race bikes, none of which I have ever seen with a stock airbox, the hose is routed to a catch can, often a small OJ can taped to a frame rail. More for appearances than anything.
Actually the "breathing" term for crankcases is more accurate than you might imagine.  Its not a huge intake but it does pull in air. I also think you are missing some of the concept when it comes to the "plugged hose"  In these models (For instance the late SOHC 750s) the breather hose from the top of the valve cover goes to a separator that has two outputs.  A drain hose is attached at the bottom and is plugged, and the second upper hose routes the gases to the air filter box.  The plug is removed to drain out the nasty spooge that collects in the separator.  Many bikes have this setup and there really is no point in having a breather hose if it is simply a dead end with a plug on it.  Its either part of a vapor recovery system or perhaps (like in the earlier SOHCs) a conduit to route the gases and liquids down to the street, farther away from the rider.

Offline MCRider

  • Such is the life of a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,376
  • Today's Lesson: One good turn deserves another.
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2010, 06:11:57 AM »
Eurban: I agree with your points.

On the CB750 (in line 4 with 180deg crank, 2 pistons up, 2 pistons down at all times) the breathing in and out is much more neutral than say a twin with a 360deg crank. And with ring blowby, its slightly positive virtually always.  Hence I say attention to sucking likely not an issue, but a filter on the end of the tube can't hurt.

Upon deeper reflection, yes the bikes I'm thinking of, my HawkGT for one, routes to the airbox first, and then to the drain tube which is plugged for periodical draining.

All performance Hawks have highly modified airboxes, or more likely pods, which Dyno runs prove are more efficient than the stock airbox, at least for HawkGTs, the emmissions breathers are routed to catchcans. I'm not sure if filters are used, there is a large sucking force in the crankcases as 2 pistons travel nearly together.

I like camn's idea of routing the hose into one of the pods. If the engine is healthy, little internal blowby etc, this shouldn't be a problem. One could even T it and run it into 2 or more of the pods, to spread out any ill effects.

To each their own.


Ride Safe:
Ron
1988 NT650 HawkGT;  1978 CB400 Hawk;  1975 CB750F -Free Bird; 1968 CB77 Super Hawk -Ticker;  Phaedrus 1972 CB750K2- Build Thread
"Sometimes the light's all shining on me, other times I can barely see, lately it appears to me, what a long, strange trip its been."

Offline Lightning

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2010, 11:31:57 AM »
Add a flare stack ;)
80' KZ440B- rebuilt/ daily rider
80' CB650C- current nightmare/ future dream?

Offline jtsmith

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: question about Pod Filters?
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2010, 02:06:53 PM »
Add a flare stack ;)

I run mine to my helmet so I can catch a buzz while I am riding!  ;D
1975 CB750K