Could a fuse be successfully added to protect the rectifier and/or regulator?
The regulator is already fused at the main. FYI
However, the fuses on these bikes are not really intended to protect the devices, but rather the wiring.
The rectifier is actually more robust than fuses/fuse holders are, unless subjected to abuses such as reverse polarity.
The alternator is incapable of providing more voltage/current than the rectifier can withstand. It is only the battery that has enough power to hurt it if wired backwards.
If you really needed to protect from reverse polarity battery connections, a fuse could be inserted in the line between the rectifier and the battery at a point electrically before (destination viewpoint) the branch that goes off to the main fuse.
Care would need to be taken so that the fuse connections are isolated from the battery's corrosive out-gassing, if you wish it to remain reliable. Hermetic sealing would be preferred, or all gold plated contacts.
Note that if the fuse did blow/fail before or while riding, you probably wouldn't know it until the engine quit due to a depleted battery, as there is no charging indicator on the stock bike to tell you the charging system is off-line.
Further, the response time of the fuse would need to be scrutinized. It would have to blow faster than the rectifier was able to withstand without damage.
All diodes have a "withstand limits" specification. Some are "never exceed". A fuse would not prevent the application, only limit the duration of the fault event. I don't have access to the stock rectifier diode specification.
Does this help?
Cheers,