spin the clip so the ends are within the groove.
Just out of curiosity here-
The clip ends are "wider" when installed within the groove than the relief is wide, so they are in fact still supported with the groove, so why would one want to effectively double the span of un-supported (and non-effective in shear) ring?
Granted, we are splitting hairs here, as it would be reatined with 1/10 of what it has now, but it does make me wonder...................
We have a "compressed" (installed) gap of 4.2mm, if we rotate the clip, we now have 8.4mm of unsupported (in proper shear configuration) clip, the ring that spans the 4.2mm gap (if rotated) is no longer in shear as it is unsupported. It is only in shear where it is retained via the groove in an engineering sense. Purely academic, I know!