Author Topic: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?  (Read 41685 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline q2418130103p

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 618
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #50 on: April 11, 2011, 05:32:34 PM »
I fitted mine with pedals, that engine really weighs a lot more than you would expect.
Check out my CB550 project thread:
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=83097

Offline hondaface75

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 330
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #51 on: April 11, 2011, 07:17:44 PM »

By your statement, you must think that the percentage of idiot riders is less for vintage bikes.  If you think about it, the idiot factor remains the same, regardless of the age of the bike.

I think the percentage is less. I see more mature riders on old bikes and young gungs on newer rockets. Im 26, have only owned and riden my 750, I dont mess around on the road. Ive taken off and done just about everything listed on this thread to reduce weight. Its just what I like. I love stockers, but mine was a basket case and restos are expensive. So more fun it is.

Offline scottly

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,780
  • Humboldt, AZ
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #52 on: April 11, 2011, 07:46:03 PM »

but as mentioned, the brake disc is very heavy and overbuilt, unfortunately i dont think you can machine it thinner as the caliper is designed for it be that thick i imagine. mc again brake upgrade?

ashley
 
You can remove about 1/2 pound by drilling the stock disc, and improve wet braking performance at the same time. Lighter phenolic pistons are available, which might be very cost effective if the stock piston needs to be replaced.
Don't fix it if it ain't broke!
Helmets save brains. Always wear one and ride like everyone is trying to kill you....

Offline 754

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,050
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2011, 08:30:09 PM »
I dont want a newer bike, I just want my old ones quicker and lighter...
 I dont know why the comparison to newer ones keep coming up.. this aint the sprotbike forum, its the sohc 4 forum..
Maker of the WELDLESS 750 Frame Kit
dodogas99@gmail.com
Kelowna B.C.       Canada

My next bike will be a ..ANFOB.....

It's All part of the ADVENTURE...

73 836cc.. Green, had it for 3 decades!!
Lost quite a few CB 750's along the way

Offline 333

  • Time for change
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,558
  • Mail List Member #162 - Call me Stan
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #54 on: April 11, 2011, 08:35:43 PM »
I can't tell if you're being argumentative for the sake of it, or if you really follow your logic so closely. I mean, by your argument don't change ANYTHING on the bike. Hell, if it can't be a 'busa, why bother? I like stock bikes, quite a bit actually. Arguing that there's no reason to lighten one just seems silly to me. It's not as if the physics involved in motorcycle handling are unproven.

Just curious... is yours bone stock, and if not why did you change whatever you did?

My bike is as stock as I can afford.  I have a 4 into 1 exhaust, because I don't have $1000.00+ for a custom 4 into 4(and factory is long since discontinued).  I have a halogen headlight(55w vs the stock 35w), because I want to see(that, and it was a popular upgrade back in the day).  I'd like to switch out the rest of the lighting to offset the extra current drain of the headlight.  I run better tires because I like traction.

But I never said I dislike modified bikes.  I've helped built a vintage race bike.  It was be-yootifull.  But it's purpose was to go up against similarly built bikes on a race track.  The impression I get from most of these threads is that someone is looking to built a street racer, and the thinking that comes across is to make a bike that will compete with modern bikes.  My love for this era of bike drives me to speak out and try to stop someone from getting spanked by a smaller/newer bike.
Go metric, every inch of the way!

CB350F0  "Scrouching Tiger"
CT70K0    "Sneezing Poodle"

www.alexandriaseaport.org

Offline moho

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #55 on: April 11, 2011, 09:00:22 PM »
for me it's all about power to weight ratio. it's where things get interesting, I have a bone stock cb550 an a 550 I'm cutting/removing every bit of extra fluff. I would guess 40+ lb's so far an the difference is amazing. if you don't understand physics or esthetics you should go polish your center stand.

 
76 cb550f
69 cb750ko
75 cb400f
79 sr500
80 sr500
96 vfr750
88 nx650

Offline scottly

  • Global Moderator
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,780
  • Humboldt, AZ
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #56 on: April 11, 2011, 09:10:37 PM »
for me it's all about power to weight ratio.  if you don't understand physics or esthetics you should go polish your center stand.
 
ROTFLOL!!!
Don't fix it if it ain't broke!
Helmets save brains. Always wear one and ride like everyone is trying to kill you....

Offline 754

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,050
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #57 on: April 11, 2011, 09:19:21 PM »
You know you are a stocklover, when you  wax your c-stand.....

On my 836 I cut off the sidestand mount and took off the c-stand..

 I like the look on the 10 yr old 600 riders face when you get into a top gear roll on at 55..
Maker of the WELDLESS 750 Frame Kit
dodogas99@gmail.com
Kelowna B.C.       Canada

My next bike will be a ..ANFOB.....

It's All part of the ADVENTURE...

73 836cc.. Green, had it for 3 decades!!
Lost quite a few CB 750's along the way

Offline camelman

  • Man... Myth... Legend
  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,899
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #58 on: April 11, 2011, 10:18:07 PM »
I like the look on new bike owner's faces when I drop two gears and peg it going into a turn.  I seem to lose people pretty quickly that way.  ;-)

I wouldn't mind a little less weight on my bike, but I'd only concentrate on the rotating mass for that. The wheels with tubes and tires weigh over 40 pounds... if memory serves me correctly.  You can swap in lighter mags, or go with dirtbike wheel conversions, and save 25 pounds there alone (I'm talking about a 350F).

To whoever says these things can't handle well, I'm prone to not agree with you.  Now, the whole poor braking, slow accelerating, smelling like poorly burned 87 Octane thing... well... that's a different matter.  I have put in 12 hour days on my 350F and been no worse for the wear though.  That has to count for something!

Camelman
1972 350f rider: sold
1972 350f/466f cafe: for sale
1977 CB400f cafe:sold
1975 CB400f rider: sold
1970 CB750 K0 complete bike: sold
2005 Triumph Sprint ST 1050 rider

We've got to cut it off... and then come down on rockets.  (quoted from: seven minutes of terror)

Offline BeSeeingYou

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,913
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #59 on: April 11, 2011, 10:46:57 PM »
you should go polish your center stand.

 

and you will save a few ounces by getting all the grime and road crude off in the process. ;)

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,802
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #60 on: April 12, 2011, 12:53:17 AM »
I wonder why no one is talking about crosswinds?

Heck, I ADD weight to mine.  Fairing, bags, luggage rack, case savers, horns.  I like to stay on a driving line that *I* choose, rather than what prevailing winds or land barge truck and Winnebago turbulence chooses.  "Flickability" is a lot of fun you get flicked into the oncoming lane, or off the side of the road. :o

So, I'd like to ask, "What's the longest haul you routinely do with your radically lightened SOHC4?"  More than a couple of miles on only the finest of days?

And before you get all defensive about me picking on your preferences, I can post about 50 pages of already posted comments about how ugly this stock part is, or how badly designed that portion is and "needs upgrading" (even thought it has a proven service record of 30 + years).

Cheers,
Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline MoMo

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,271
  • Ride like you're invisible
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #61 on: April 12, 2011, 12:59:17 AM »
I'm with you..................add weight every year :D...Larry

Offline paulages

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,876
  • 1976 cb735
    • DOOMTOWN RIDERS P.R.M.C.
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #62 on: April 12, 2011, 01:11:41 AM »
I wonder why no one is talking about crosswinds?

Heck, I ADD weight to mine.  Fairing, bags, luggage rack, case savers, horns.  I like to stay on a driving line that *I* choose, rather than what prevailing winds or land barge truck and Winnebago turbulence chooses.  "Flickability" is a lot of fun you get flicked into the oncoming lane, or off the side of the road. :o

So, I'd like to ask, "What's the longest haul you routinely do with your radically lightened SOHC4?"  More than a couple of miles on only the finest of days?

And before you get all defensive about me picking on your preferences, I can post about 50 pages of already posted comments about how ugly this stock part is, or how badly designed that portion is and "needs upgrading" (even thought it has a proven service record of 30 + years).

Cheers,

This is pretty much why I think a CB750 is best stock... it's weight lends itself well to touring, and handles best in stock form (geometry, anyway... suspension improvements side). This is not to say that the smaller fours aren't great stock too, but trying to lighten a pig of a cb750 into a nimble "cafe racer" is a challenge, in my opinion. In fact, I'd wager many of the weight saving neigh-sayers here are not familiar with the "smaller" SOHCs. A 500/550 in stock trim, though not much lighter than a 750, feels dramatically more so in my opinion.

Anyway, I say whatever floats your boat... go sailing. I just don't get the folks arguing that a lighter nimbler bike automatically equals trying to be modern. I love my 300# KLX650 in the winter because I feel safe being light and nimble. Also for what it's worth, one of the bikes I've probably ridden hardest and had fun dusting squidly rocket douchebags on was a bone stock CB750 K6 with 20 year old tires on it. Unless you're on the track going reeeeeeeally fast, upright bars handle way better than low bars. My KLX is testament to that...
paul
SOHC4 member #1050

1974 CB550 (735cc)
1976 CB550 (590cc) road racer
1973 CB750K3
1972 NORTON Commando Combat
1996 KLX650 R

Offline Retro Rocket

  • Eggs are hard due too a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 19,235
  • ROCK & ROLL
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #63 on: April 12, 2011, 01:29:28 AM »
I wonder why no one is talking about crosswinds?

Heck, I ADD weight to mine.  Fairing, bags, luggage rack, case savers, horns.  I like to stay on a driving line that *I* choose, rather than what prevailing winds or land barge truck and Winnebago turbulence chooses.  "Flickability" is a lot of fun you get flicked into the oncoming lane, or off the side of the road. :o

So, I'd like to ask, "What's the longest haul you routinely do with your radically lightened SOHC4?"  More than a couple of miles on only the finest of days?

And before you get all defensive about me picking on your preferences, I can post about 50 pages of already posted comments about how ugly this stock part is, or how badly designed that portion is and "needs upgrading" (even thought it has a proven service record of 30 + years).

Cheers,
. So going on your theory, no one should ride a 250, 400, 500 or 550.? Well they are all lighter than the 750. Side winds effect every bike especially the fully faired sport bikes. A  fully faired bike will be far more effected by wind than our older non faired bikes, i have owned lots of fully faired sport bikes {900f2's, GPX750's, GSXR1100 and more} , the only bike i ever rode that was badly effected by side wind {all bikes are effected in some way in strong winds} was a GPX250 Kawasaki i had on loan when my 3rd GPX750 was in the shop, trucks were more of a problem. I have ridden my 750/4's over a thousand kilometres in a day on numerous occasions and it is something you get used too , i have done most of these miles down the New England Highway and any Aussie member will tell you that it is a major truck route and only 2 lanes most of the way.  LLoyd, i only got my car license when i turned 40, [needed it for work or i still wouldn't have it} I have ridden and owned bikes and mostly lightened  fast ones all my life.......I gather you have never ridden a 2 stroke road bike made in the 80's or newer, they are far lighter than any old Honda could possibly be and fully faired.......
750 K2 1000cc
750 F1 970cc
750 Bitsa 900cc
If You can't fix it with a hammer, You've got an electrical problem.

Offline faux fiddy

  • Just becaus I'm the second post on the pissed off thread doesn't mean I'm an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,810
  • bike in a box
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #64 on: April 12, 2011, 01:57:19 AM »
Ride with 1/4 tank of fuel in shorts, sneakers and a tee-shirt with no helmet! :)
You are so much lighter now you can remove that second front disk you added-really it is what it is.

I think I'll work on trimming off the 12-pack gut.
^^^^^^^/l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^/l^^^
. . ______/ l_________________/  l
<'  '  '   '  o .  . . . . . . .................(
 ' VVVVV'   ')))))____>-''''''''''''''''''\  l
' . vvvv_   -              -                 \/

Offline dhall57

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,694
  • The 70's! SOHC4 Honda's & Marcia Brady of course.
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #65 on: April 12, 2011, 03:15:41 AM »
I've been fascinated with these SOHC 4 Honda's since growing up as a teenager in the 70's. Back then I had a 76 CB550 great bike, but at heart I always wanted a 750. The styling, the profile, it looked fast when sitting on the center stand. Fast forward about 35 years and I finally got my Honda CB750K6. I didn't buy it to change it or to take certain parts off that have been deemed not necessary anymore just to lighten it up a little. I wanted it all factory just like the ones I saw when I first walked into a Honda Dealer in 1971. And when I can afford to put factory pipes back on it it will be, stock that is, but of course that would add weight which to some is a bad word. I didn't buy it to race other bikes or to go down the road on the back wheel. I bought it because I just love the bike (the factory bike) and it serves me very well. Thank you very much ;D
1970 CB750KO
1971 CB500KO-project bike
1973 CB350G- project bike
1974 CB750K4-project bike
1974 CB750K4
1976 CB750K6
1977 GL1000
1997 Harley Wideglide

Offline FunJimmy

  • Who you calling
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,798
  • Vancouver
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #66 on: April 12, 2011, 09:14:56 AM »
Sadly, most engineers can’t see the many shades of grey. It’s either black or white.
It’s this tunnel vision that usually precipitates their sanctimonious attitudes.

When I had my ZX1100 I used to ride with a fella on a KLR650. He could rail the canyon turns like anyone on a sportbike, but dual sport tires do have their limits, and one day he exceeded them. Fortunately he’s fine and the memory of that bike and those corners will last a life time. 
You never see a motorcycle parked outside of a psychiatrist's office!

CB550 Cafe Interceptor a Gentlemans Roadster
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=27159.0

Offline 754

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 29,050
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #67 on: April 12, 2011, 09:43:04 AM »
 TT. flickability means quick response to inputs, not necessarily blown off the road. If you can ride the fairingedlandbarge, you can ride anything..
 My 836 rigid has such a LOW CG, I can push it with one hand, not a bad thing. And I have ridden it 600+ miles in a day, for first day ride in years.. to me that is rideable.
 I hate the high CG of a stocker, but it  does help for off roading.

 Maybe someone should compare lap times between superbikes of the 70s vs new streetbikes on a tight track.
 When I ask a buddy with newer Ducatis how fast he goes around specific corners, he never ever answers. These are corners that I know well on a road we used a lot.. and I still think  the speeds some of my buddies did on their xl 350s, back in the day were not shameful.. and yes one of them guys  did better with his c-stand removed on his cb 750, it was hitting all the time anyway...ground it halfway thru..
Maker of the WELDLESS 750 Frame Kit
dodogas99@gmail.com
Kelowna B.C.       Canada

My next bike will be a ..ANFOB.....

It's All part of the ADVENTURE...

73 836cc.. Green, had it for 3 decades!!
Lost quite a few CB 750's along the way

Offline kajtek

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 285
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #68 on: April 12, 2011, 11:09:43 AM »

but as mentioned, the brake disc is very heavy and overbuilt, unfortunately i dont think you can machine it thinner as the caliper is designed for it be that thick i imagine. mc again brake upgrade?

ashley
 
You can remove about 1/2 pound by drilling the stock disc, and improve wet braking performance at the same time. Lighter phenolic pistons are available, which might be very cost effective if the stock piston needs to be replaced.

thanks, i didnt realise a phenolic piston was lighter. mine is pitted but luckily isnt leaking yet. i have considered drilling the disc but havent access anymore to a drill press.. i imagine its no fun to drill through that disc!

ashley
1978 honda cb400f supersport

Offline OldSchool_IsCool

  • Really feeling like an
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,349
  • WARNING: Objects in mirror appear to be LOSING!
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #69 on: April 12, 2011, 11:48:59 AM »
I stripped off the winter coat... FINALLY!!
Can I have a motorcycle when I get old enough?
If you take care of it.
What do you have to do?
Lot’s of things. You’ve been watching me.
Will you show me all of them?
Sure.
Is it hard?
Not if you have the right attitudes. It’s having the right attitudes that’s hard.

Offline FunJimmy

  • Who you calling
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,798
  • Vancouver
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #70 on: April 12, 2011, 11:54:10 AM »
thanks, i didnt realise a phenolic piston was lighter. mine is pitted but luckily isnt leaking yet. i have considered drilling the disc but havent access anymore to a drill press.. i imagine its no fun to drill through that disc!

ashley

Send it out for drilling and surface grinding.
There service providers listed on this site.
It's well worth the cost. IMHO
You never see a motorcycle parked outside of a psychiatrist's office!

CB550 Cafe Interceptor a Gentlemans Roadster
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=27159.0

Offline Skunk Stripe

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 817
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #71 on: April 12, 2011, 01:51:46 PM »
I know 1 good reason to have a centerstand. Flats. Now, around town is probably not a big deal but on a road trip, you can either can a truck to come get you, or you can leave on the stand and change your tube and be on your way.
Besides that, I doubt the centerstand effects much. It is low on the bike and so it is not contributing to a high cg. Yes it weighs a fair amount but at least it does not stick out in the wind.
I feel lowering the cg is as important as losing the weight. A lower cg will increase this "flickability" as the less weight you have to move any distance, the quicker it will move. A perfect example is the classic metronome. The higher you move the weight, the slower it goes back and forth, same exact thing.
I guess my point is, if you are going to do things like this, don't just concentrate on 1 thing. lower the weight, cg, and unsprung mass.

If you don't want to do this, then don't.
Also, I don't think anyone is trying to take on modern sport bikes. Some might, but then they are relying on themselves being better riders than the other person in order to win.

Offline Retro Rocket

  • Eggs are hard due too a
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 19,235
  • ROCK & ROLL
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #72 on: April 12, 2011, 03:50:51 PM »
Quote
and yes one of them guys  did better with his c-stand removed on his cb 750, it was hitting all the time anyway...ground it halfway thru..

Thats exactly why i remove mine Frank, thats also why i like my pegs a bit higher as well, i have had my foot "ripped" off the pegs a few times and it can be a scary situation.....
750 K2 1000cc
750 F1 970cc
750 Bitsa 900cc
If You can't fix it with a hammer, You've got an electrical problem.

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,802
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #73 on: April 12, 2011, 03:58:41 PM »
Sadly, most engineers can’t see the many shades of grey. It’s either black or white.
It’s this tunnel vision that usually precipitates their sanctimonious attitudes.

ROTFLMAO
You forgot to put a bunch of smiley emoticons in your post!

But, if you weren't jesting and just professing your own brand of sanctimonious ignorance, then I feel obliged to post this to a public forum...  ;)

Working engineers almost immediately learn the world is not perfect and no two parts are ever exactly the same.  It's all gray.  But still, all those gray parts have to work together.  And, with amazing accuracy, good engineers can predict whether a gray device or part can do what is intended without actually making one.  Frequently, they don't even get to make it.  They simply describe and document it with enough detail so some low paid menial can make it per specifications.  Many times the part maker doesn't even know what the part will be used in.  But, still, if the parts were made to the engineer's specification, a million parts can be made and they will all work in the machine as designed.

People making one offs, can hand fit a bunch of trial and error made parts together that may or may not stand the test of time and use.  But, they would go bankrupt and starve if there was a sudden demand for a million of them.  ...unless they hired an actual engineer to revamp all the parts of that one-off for mass production.

Further, it only takes an average Joe with a little skill or training, to repair a damaged, neglected, abused machine.  Slightly more skill to make a part that will fit onto one of them.  To design a part that the average Joe can make AND which will fit, work properly, and reliably onto a million similar vehicles is beyond most people's comprehension or capability.
Go ahead try it!  I double dare you!   Make a replacement starter push button switch to fit in the stock bar control of a 77 Cb750.  Now offer it to everybody that needs one for the price they will pay...and feed your family.

Anyone who has made more than a one-off learns that a test case or example of one proves only the very basics of concept.  And usually, the test case of one was made at the cost of many failed parts before the one in the one off.

Certainly I can appreciate a unique work of art and the considerable skills it can take to make it all come together and please the eye.  But, such things rarely stand the test of time and even more rarely stand the test of reliable and repeated use.  A wonderful example is MRieck's gorgeous and very well made million dollar CB.  To my knowledge there is only one.  Ask him if he'd like to make a million of them.  Ask him if he thought he could sell a million of them at a profit.  Would you buy one at his named price?

You want sanctimonious?  How about a small group of idealists who believe they can improve a wildly successful vehicle design by having the mad skills and superior ability of removing a center stand?   There's some tunnel vision for you, IMO.  Additionally, you have absolutely no right to complain about engineers as a class unless you avoid every single item designed by them.  To do otherwise is just plain hypocrisy.  So, when will you be making your own spark plugs?  ... Or carburetors, rather than adapting one created by some talented engineer onto your engine (designed by another group of talented engineers) ?  Are those carbs or tires that you selected designed by people that only understand black and white?  If so, why on earth would you tolerate using them on your machine?

Yes, I know.  It's a hobby to some.  People do all sort of things for their hobby, and I'm all for its benefits to the individual.  But really, don't fool yourself into believing you are making design "improvements", oh so superior to the original machine because you made it lighter.  You only slightly entered the realm of the many trade offs or grey areas that the engineers made over 30 years ago.  Often, you are mostly changing things for change sake (or aesthetics) rather than any measurable or demonstrable improvement.   (Many here don't even do any changes, they just talk about it and argue in a forum to pass the time.  Hey, sounds like a hobby!) :)
Could the original machine have been made lighter?  Of course!  Would they have sold the population that they did at the higher price it would have demanded?  I don't think so.

So you can bash "engineers" all you want, free speech and all.  But, look around yourself and note just how dependent you are on them.  Unless you park your bike in a smoke stained cave, you are just being a hypocrite and #$%*ing about those who know more than you do.

Sanctimonious, idealist, or realist, you can chose for yourself.  Some days, I'm just flippant.   ;)  (But I, at least, try to maintain a perspective) ;)

Someday, I expect there will be a faction that emphatically believes the best looking bikes have hatchet marks all over them from where it was "lightened" ...with style.

Cheers,  ;D ;D

Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline FunJimmy

  • Who you calling
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,798
  • Vancouver
Re: What is everyone stripping off to save weight?
« Reply #74 on: April 12, 2011, 04:22:42 PM »
Wow. Guess I hit a nerve Eh?

Even in your own rant, you touch on some of the constraints placed on engineers. They can be budget constraints imposed by accountants, manufacturing limitations, material availability, marketing issues and a plethora of other factors that limit the engineers. It's not always as simple as "engineers know best" that dictates the final product. Just ask the Columbia Shuttle team.     

BTW, I couldn't find the emoticon menu from my BlackBerry (yes it comes courtesy or engineering) but will add them when able.

Bad Jimmy, bad
« Last Edit: April 12, 2011, 04:47:50 PM by FunJimmy »
You never see a motorcycle parked outside of a psychiatrist's office!

CB550 Cafe Interceptor a Gentlemans Roadster
http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php?topic=27159.0