Author Topic: bat pac  (Read 4858 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Luythen

  • Guest
bat pac
« on: April 12, 2006, 04:14:52 AM »
Hey all

Following the link in the faq to the battery elimination page i found the bat pac.

On the website it advertises that it works with older honda cb 500, bikes.
I plan on running my honda without starter, (just kick) and I am already running it without blinkers.

However i read a post here on the forum saying that you cannot run a battery free bike with the stock generator.

Is this true? And if this thing is no option how should i go about making my bike battery free?

cheers
Henrik

Offline cb(r)

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: bat pac
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2006, 05:00:59 AM »
i have been interested in this option.  basically you are using a capacitor to hold a charge for a very short time.  I have not done this bat pac because I am slow in my build and not to that point yet and I know what you are talking about.  I say if try it what can it hurt?  although do a search for ultra capacitors these to sites below are some interesting reading about what you are looking for.

tecategroup.com
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/01/about_supercapa.html

if you buy the batpac keep us informed

Offline csendker

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,718
  • Chris; '75 CB550 & a Crusty 'ol boat
Actually runs --> 1975 CB550-K1
Projects ---> Crusty old boat
Gallery --> http://www.sohc4.us/gallery/v/members/personal/Christopher/?g2_navId=xada3c7ff

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,487
Re: bat pac
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2006, 06:43:51 AM »
i would hope the alternator on the honda puts out more juice than a generator on an old harley.the bat pac has been advertised for years to replace the battery on harleys.
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

eldar

  • Guest
Re: bat pac
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2006, 07:54:42 AM »
I think the whole dispute on this is that the generator does not put out until 2000 rpms. Kinda like that woman across the bar we all keep trying to pick up.

Offline Bob Wessner

  • "Carbs Suck!"
  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,079
Re: bat pac
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2006, 08:17:16 AM »
Quote
Kinda like that woman across the bar we all keep trying to pick up.

 ;D ;D
We'll all be someone else's PO some day.

Offline cb(r)

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: bat pac
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2006, 08:23:50 AM »
Quote
Kinda like that woman across the bar we all keep trying to pick up.

 ;D ;D

avatar is awesome too. :D : ;D

eldar

  • Guest
Re: bat pac
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2006, 08:27:57 AM »
Isnt that part of the reason we all have bikes?

Offline cb(r)

  • Hot Shot
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: bat pac
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2006, 08:53:55 AM »
I had a large capacitor powering my 350 twin. I still have it and could throw it on my 550 and see what develops. . .

  BUT, I really hated it for a street bike.   I am all for loosing as much weight as possible, but on my twin the head and tail light flickered tremendously at idle, and obviously if you stalled or crashed at night you'd be in the dark.  The spark seemed a little weaker making the bike prone to stall at idle.  And the turn signals acted as a kill switch.

A much better idea IMO is a tiny battery that you can tuck under a seat or in a custom box. As an example the first picture is a twin I just finished with a 1.5 pound battery under the seat in a cut down stock box.   The second is my 550 with a similar battery under the bump.  They're still light weight, and more functional than the capacitor (still no electric start though and if you leave anything electrical on with the bike off, the battery will be dead in a few minutes . . .)

that would be cool if you could put the cap on the 550 at least for grins and giggles.  just one more thing what if  you put l.e.d's on your 350 to draw less from the cap?

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,487
Re: bat pac
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2006, 09:17:29 AM »
eldar,i just paid attention to your avatar,i bout fell outa my chair.that thing is hilarious.
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

eldar

  • Guest
Re: bat pac
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2006, 10:09:17 AM »
Thats because we all relate to it!

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,487
Re: bat pac
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2006, 11:44:36 AM »
yep
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Offline my78k

  • I am Meat-O of the Hungry Horses MC
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,839
Re: bat pac
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2006, 12:14:01 PM »
Hey guys, call me crazy on this but I have heard a lot of talk on this site about this topic...does the battery actually make that much difference when it comes to shedding weight or is it just a matter trying to make it work so you can say did it?

I mean these batteries aren't all that heavy and when you throw in the weight of a capicitor would it make that much of a difference? I mean I could probably just cut out the Budweiser or stop "supersizing" my McD's and get the same result...

Dennis

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,487
Re: bat pac
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2006, 12:25:45 PM »
dennis,i agree,the battery doesnt weigh much to begin with.if someone wants to quit using the electric starter they can buy a real tiny batter to use the kicker with.
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

eldar

  • Guest
Re: bat pac
« Reply #14 on: April 12, 2006, 12:27:54 PM »
well my battery is at least 5+ pounds. Now for street use, no big deal but for those wanted to do some track time or even just as a weight loss program, it is a spot to look at. You could probably get a lighter gel pac or something. Some people just want to mod their bikes just because. If I had the cash, I would do quite a few things just cause I wanted to.

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,487
Re: bat pac
« Reply #15 on: April 12, 2006, 01:03:57 PM »
yea like sell that k8 and buy a real bike. :D :D :D
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

Offline my78k

  • I am Meat-O of the Hungry Horses MC
  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,839
Re: bat pac
« Reply #16 on: April 12, 2006, 01:10:09 PM »
And to think I used to think you were a pretty smart guy Duster.... ;)

Offline dusterdude

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,487
Re: bat pac
« Reply #17 on: April 12, 2006, 01:12:23 PM »
yea,ive fooled a lot of people in my time. ;D
mark
1972 k1 750
1949 fl panhead
1 1/2 gl1100 goldwings
1998 cbr600 f3

eldar

  • Guest
Re: bat pac
« Reply #18 on: April 12, 2006, 02:34:46 PM »
hes just hoping I sell it so he can buy it and join the club. He is a closet k8'er!

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: bat pac
« Reply #19 on: April 12, 2006, 03:04:51 PM »
Following the link in the faq to the battery elimination page i found the bat pac.

On the website it advertises that it works with older honda cb 500, bikes.

Is this true? And if this thing is no option how should i go about making my bike battery free?


That website is either lying to boost sales or doesn't know the bike they list doesn't have a magnet in the alternator.  Further, I don't understand why the SOHC4 website has a pointer to that battery eliminator site.  The Bat-Pac is only practical with bikes that have a permanent magnet in the alternator/generator.

The SOHC4 alternators work by using magnetism created by an electromagnet (the field coil) that only behaves as a magnet when it is provided electricity needed to make a magnetic field.
Our field coils draw about 1.7 amps whenever the alternator is powered by enabling the key switch. (.7 amps if an installed battery is above 14.5V... not likely without the engine turning).

Each ignition coil draws 2.4 amps (5 ohm primaries) whenever its associated point contact is closed.  There are two of them.  Also, note that spark voltage diminishes with input voltage loss.  When supply voltage falls below about 9 V, spark gap arcs are ify, at best.  So, if you can eliminate any additional lighting loads, whenever you turn on the ignition, 4.1 amps at no lower than 9V are needed before the engine or alternator rotor is even turning.  If not a battery, where will this current flow come from and how long?

Not the alternator.
It should be obvious that even a powered alternator will make no power output unless it is spinning.  I've not seen or measured a power output vs, RPM chart.  However, I do note that with lighting circuits enabled, the bike is unable to overcome the system loads and charge the battery, which is draining, at idle speeds of 1000 RPM.

As I understand it, the Bat Pac is simply a capacitor bank.  To my knowledge, a perfect capacitor has yet to created.  They all have series resistance and leakage resistance due to the materials they are created from and their physical properties.  What this means is that they will NOT hold a charge indefinately.  Nor will they give up their stored charge without some loss.  This later property is probably not important for this application, though.  But, the leakage is.  More on this later.

Also, since our alternators can only make power when supplied some power.  The Bat-Pac will have to be precharged to have any hope of starting the bike.  And, there will be a very limited amount of time that the capacitor will have enough charge to start the bike.  It's going to be a race between ignition on and kick start.  And, if the bike has been sitting awhile, forget it, without some external power source.

So, when you kick start the bike, you're going to have to kick it to about 1500 RPM in order to keep the Bat-Pac charged up to a level that will continue to fire the ignition coils and spark plugs.

Capacitor size.
Let's say we start with a fully charged capacitor at an optomistic14 V.  We can use it until it drains to 9V, or about 36% of its total capacity.  This is about one half of a standard capacitor charge or discharge rate. So, we must double the result of the standard 63% formula of  T / R = C, where T is time in seconds.  R is the Resitance of the circuit in ohms and C is the Capacitance in farads.

If we assume 5 seconds between key on to kick start  Then a 0.834 FARAD (834,000 microfarads) capacitor is needed that is also able to withstand, say 20 V without breakdown.

A not very thorough search, finds that Digikey has some Panasonic Electrolyic caps in 100,000 microfarads.  They are $13.36 each and eight of them ought to do it. They are also 40 D x 80 L in size (mm).  These can be wired together in a block about 3x3x6.5 inches.

It's up to you whether this is more attractive on your bike than a battery.  However, I couldn't find a leakage spec.  So, I can't calculate how long they will stay charged after you turn off the running bike.

On bikes with permanent magnet type alternators or generators, each time you kick the bike the capacitor gets recharged.  As long as the power generated from the kick is greater than the draw for the ignition, the bike will start and run.  On such bikes, the capacitor requirement is far less than calculated above.  Probably one or two caps is all you'd need.  Or, a few more smaller, cheaper ones.

So, can we get rid of the battery eliminator reference in the SOHC4 FAQ?  Or, should we put this post in the FAQ right next to it?



Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline ProTeal55

  • Old Timer
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,887
  • Est1968.com
    • Joe's Barbershop Chicago
Re: bat pac
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2006, 03:32:35 PM »
Not to bust in, But I know in the high-end car stereo/audio world they sell a C.A.P capacitor, which I believe is a monster compared to the ones normally used in those situations. I remember seeing one in a car along time ago, it was flat, like a amplifer, instead of being round...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=9710678771

Not sure how big it is, but it looks like a "saddlebag" mount  ;D ::) ;D
« Last Edit: April 12, 2006, 03:49:23 PM by ProTeal55 »
Joe a.k.a ProTeal55 a.k.a JoeyCocks a.k.a Maker of Friends

Offline csendker

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,718
  • Chris; '75 CB550 & a Crusty 'ol boat
Re: bat pac
« Reply #21 on: April 12, 2006, 05:19:30 PM »
Quote
C.A.P capacitor
 
This monster looks to me to be bigger & weigh more than the standard battery, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose?

Quote
looks like a "saddlebag" mount

Heh, heh.

Quote
So, can we get rid of the battery eliminator reference in the SOHC4 FAQ?  Or, should we put this post in the FAQ right next to it?

The FAQ already indicates these problems, albeit without getting into all of the technical mumbo-jumbo.  That's why I linked it earlier in this thread.  Now if someone could figure out how to jimmy a magnet setup into the alternator, maybe all this would work.  Of course, the magnet would have to be pretty light or that would also defeat the purpose.

While not for me, it seems that minimizing power requirements, eliminating the electric starter and using a dinky battery is a reasonable compromise.
Actually runs --> 1975 CB550-K1
Projects ---> Crusty old boat
Gallery --> http://www.sohc4.us/gallery/v/members/personal/Christopher/?g2_navId=xada3c7ff

eldar

  • Guest
Re: bat pac
« Reply #22 on: April 12, 2006, 06:20:00 PM »
Well if a person was realy bored, they could modify their generator by changing the windings on it to make it more powerful. I kow this is dont with electric motors and an electric motor and generator are basically the same thing. If you turn an electric motor, you will produce current. That much is fact. OR you could somehow fit a magnet into the alternator in such a way as to generate some or all the power needed for start up. Things like this could possibly work, I call it innovation. Our old cycle tech was innovated upon, which is obvious since bikes these days are much better in almost every way aside from looks (of course). If our bikes were a pinnacle, they would still be made today.

Offline TwoTired

  • Really Old Timer ...
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,805
Re: bat pac
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2006, 07:31:29 PM »

This monster looks to me to be bigger & weigh more than the standard battery, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose?

Yes, I think so, too.  In addition, there is the problem of keeping the Cap charged over long periods of non-operation.

Quote
So, can we get rid of the battery eliminator reference in the SOHC4 FAQ?  Or, should we put this post in the FAQ right next to it?


The FAQ already indicates these problems, albeit without getting into all of the technical mumbo-jumbo. 


Ouch, thanks a lot. :-\   Exactly the same type of comments I've heard from upper management who can't be bothered by how things actually work.  I'm sure you've got a bright future ahead of you.

I guess from now on I should just let people waste their time and money so they can learn it all on their own.

Best of luck!


Lloyd... (SOHC4 #11 Original Mail List)
72 500, 74 550, 75 550K, 75 550F, 76 550F, 77 550F X2, 78 550K, 77 750F X2, 78 750F, 79CX500, 85 700SC, GL1100

Those that learn from history are doomed to repeat it by those that don't learn from history.

Offline csendker

  • Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,718
  • Chris; '75 CB550 & a Crusty 'ol boat
Re: bat pac
« Reply #24 on: April 12, 2006, 07:46:23 PM »
TT: You misunderstood me, no hit intended, sorry.  I actually like the technical mumbo-jumbo, and I did read it through.  I like to know why things tick as they do, and learning from others who have already fought the battle is always helpful - that's why I'm here in the first place.  I was merely pointing out that the FAQ already implied that there's all sorts of problems with removing the battery but with less detail than you currently provided.  Maybe I should clean up my vernacular mumbo-jumbo.
Actually runs --> 1975 CB550-K1
Projects ---> Crusty old boat
Gallery --> http://www.sohc4.us/gallery/v/members/personal/Christopher/?g2_navId=xada3c7ff